Slashdot Mirror


What To Wear On Mars

Roland Piquepaille writes "If men ever land on Mars, what will they wear to protect them from radiation, micrometeors and the very cold climate? Several students from the University of Alberta tackled the problem and designed space suits for Mars. Their prototype suit is composed of twelve layers of materials, including one made from Demron, a new nanotechnology material developed by a Florida-based company, Radiation Shield Technologies. The students and their professor, Dr. Barry Patchett, think their suit will largely be ready before real missions to Mars start in about twenty years. They also hope that NASA will pick their design. More details and references are available in this overview, including some illustrations."

16 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. How many people will go to Mars? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There will be some people landing on Mars, for reasons of prestige. Putting people on Mars will be a histroic achievement, but I think it will be robots that actually get stuff done. Let the astronanuts plant flags, the robots will continue to do most of the research.

    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:How many people will go to Mars? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Please. How long did it take for the robots up there now to pick up a bloody rock or to even get off the landing vehicle? In the time it took a machine to roll 10 feet I would have been able to pick up sacks of rocks and dig a hole 6 feet deep.

      As for the article, why bother designing the suits now? I'm sure that in 20 years there will be materials that will be much more advanced that we'll want to use instead.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:How many people will go to Mars? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to take into account the effort required in getting people to Mars, the health risks, the effort required to get them back (not an issue for robots unless they are returning samples), the technology required to keep them alive, and other factors. Using robots for the real work seems like the best solution.

      --
      Mod parent up!
    3. Re:How many people will go to Mars? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As for the article, why bother designing the suits now? I'm sure that in 20 years there will be materials that will be much more advanced that we'll want to use instead.

      Why bother upgrading your PC now? In two years time there will be faster processors and larger harddisk avilable, and then you can just ask yourself the same question again...

      A spacesuit is in essence a highly complex, articulate one man spaceship. As such, it takes time to develop and iron out the bugs. The A7L suit used on the Apollo missions took nine years to develop, and was, as far as I can understand, a simpler piece of enginering than a suit for Mars will be - for starters, the gravity on the moon are less, meaning that the suit could have more mass without beeing uncomfertable to wear for extended periods of time. Also the moon has no atmosphere, while if you're going to Mars you might want to make sure there is no way the atmosphere on Mars affects your suit in a negative manner.

      The EMU (Extravehicular Mobility Unit) that was developed for use on the Shuttle faced a simpler problem - no gravity to worry about, no moondust that could get into the joints, no chance of the astronaut stumbling over a rock - yet it took as long as the shuttle to develop the first flightrated variants.

      Why indeed start designing the suits ten to twenty years ahead of the mission? Because it takes about that time to get the best possible design worked out, all the bugs ironed out and enought suits manufactured - during the apollo program each astronaut had 3 suits; one for training, one for flights and one backup.

      Useless fact; The A7L suit had a mass of 22 while the assosiated PLSS (Portable Life Support System) had a mass of 26 kg. The EMU (Extravehicular Mobility Unit) used on the US spaceshuttle had a mass of 50 kg and a PLLS weigthing 15 kg.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    4. Re:How many people will go to Mars? by ShadowRage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you'd be surprised, NASA has been using basically the same spacesuit design and technology for a little more than 20 years (hell, even longer) with little modifications here and there.

  2. Demron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right, let's start out by including a patented product in construction which will likely involve a long-term contract with NASA; even if Demron proves to be not the best choice, or if better fabric/material constructs come along.

    I know that spacesuit design is expensive, but is anyone else worried about universities becoming little more than state funded corporate technology parks?

    1. Re:Demron by Zzootnik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is true. And also true is that maybe it wont be NASA going to mars. That whole X-Prize thing is meant to encourage some tendencies in the private sector. Maybe NASA should become more of an Advisory/Grant-giving Org... "You guys can go into space when you get off your fat asses and make it work!"

      I hate to say it, but it very well could be that Corporate funding will put people into space. Now if only there was some way to ensure that such University research was mandatorily open-sourced...or open-patented...or whatever needs to be done to make sure standards can be put in place and the tech is available to everyone if it happens to be state-funded.

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
  3. It will be antiquated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The students and their professor, Dr. Barry Patchett, think their suit will largely be ready before real missions to Mars start in about twenty years.

    Do they really think they will get NASA to adapt a design that will be twenty years antiquated when they actually use it? You can't run space missions like that! Would we send astronauts into space today with the same technology we used twenty ye... Oh. Maybe I should invest.

    1. Re:It will be antiquated by king-manic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unlike computer technology, most other technologies don't move as fast. The old rockets are pretty much the same as the new ones technology wise, the old televisions are pretty similair to todays TV's with some additions. 20 years is nothing. Plus you have to start somewhere.

      Ahh U of A my old Alma meter.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  4. um, space suits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't these technically be pressure suits or something? Since they would be worn on the surface of mars you wouldn't actually be in space.

  5. The Right Stuff by Howzer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is the kind of "get out there and just do it" attitude that may just get us (humans) out of Low Earth Orbit for the first time in 20 years.

    These suit designers are right up there with the people doing Mars-on-Earth research (learning the skills and techniques for actual large-scale planetary surface exploration) and human-scale rover designers (building the car to do the exploration in) out there getting it done.

    And like both those other lines of research, this one has payoffs right here, right now. Bravo!

  6. Piece of cake by Alomex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As anybody who has been to Alberta in February knows, all you need is walk into the local Walmart, ask for standard gear for the Albertan winter, remove a couple of layers and voila: martian-ready space suit.

    On the day the rover sojourner landed in Mars it was colder in Edmonton than in the sojourner landing area (seriously).

  7. Re:Micrometeors? by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The density of Mars' atmosphere is about 1% of that of the Earth's. And guess what, most meteorites that you see on earth burn up in the upper layers of the atmosphere where there atmosphere is still very thin.

    The only thing that is different on Mars is that meteorites would get lower before they burn up. But I don't think it would made a difference to people living there if meteorites burned up at 10km instead of 100km. The only meteorites you have to worry about on Mars are the really large ones, that are also quite rare. So saying you need a space suit to protect you from micrometeorites on Mars is complete bull.

    What's more, they oddly make a connection between Mars' lack of a magnetosphere and micrometeors, which so laughable that it boggles the mind. Whether this was the work of the "journalist" that wrote the article or the spacesuit designers I can't tell, but applying common statistics, I'd say it was the former.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  8. Re:Important that there be a fly in the front. by buttahead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    bulls**t. how many hours of training do those silly humans take before easy missions in orbit around earth? how many thousands of hours did it take for moon missions? now multiply that time by all the training support staff that had to be present at the training sessions.

    write the program once.... use it again and again or train the human again and again, and use him once.

  9. Weather? by Afbc0m · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are they suits weather proof?
    There is brief mention of the martian dust in the first paragraph of the technical document, but it isn't addressed elsewere, Martian winds can carry dusts to excessively high speeds and will stick it to almost any material like it were spray paint, nearly impossible to remove.
    How do the space suits counter this, and will the dust should it stay on degrade the suits performance?

  10. Yeah, they should do it cheap... by BrianMarshall · · Score: 3, Insightful
    By using cutting edge materials (20 years early)
    • it's extremely expensive now
    • it's 20 years old then

    They should do this on the cheap, using the simplest most standard materials/approaches that they can.

    What they would end up with might not be the very best, and probably won't be the final design, but it could set a standard... any final design should be a lot better if it is going to cost a lot more.

    With the right publicity (for the next 20 years), this could draw more attention to the school (and its important supply of girl geeks) than developing an expensive design that is out of date and not chosen.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST