Creator of the Gaia Hypothesis Urges Nuclear Power
SteamyMobile writes "Professor James Lovelock, creator the Gaia Hypothesis and long-time intellectual leader of the Green movement, says that global warming is a dire threat, more urgent than was previously realized. He compares the threat of global warming with the threat of the Nazis in 1938, and says that in both cases, the Left was not able to grasp the urgency of the situation and see the necessary solution. What is the necessary solution to stop the global warming problem? He says it's nuclear power. Needless to say, the Greens don't agree with him, and he chides them as having irrational phobias of a safer, cleaner energy sources. Even if the "Left" isn't fully aware of the urgency of the world's energy problems, it seems like Slashdot is."
hello patriot act, good bye Fox news watching retard.
so you've split this "water" that keep bandying about, but what IS water really? It's like birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know...
unprecedented evile, whilst participating in the increasingly popular planet/population rescue initiative.
no contest. this stuff is unbreakable, & wwworks on several (more than 3) dimensions.
it's probably just a suggestion.
consult with/trust in yOUR creators.... with power to spare.
eye gas robbIE's fired up the pateNTdead PostBlock devise, wonce again?
Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, anonymous comment posting has temporarily (forever, if we had some ept) been disabled. You can still login to post. However, if bad posting continues from your IP or Subnet that privilege could be revoked as well. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner or login and improve your posting . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down (like with fuddles' phonIE bouNTy hunter scam). If you think this is unfair, we just don't care.
Are you serious? Do you not realize that if car exhausts are destroying the Earth, if, then it's a problem of excess - too much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is causing the Earth to heat up, whereas a lesser amount would have little impact. If only the rich were to drive SUVs, then it wouldn't be excess, now would it?
Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.