The Future of Symbian

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Posted by Hemos on Sunday May 23, 2004 @11:28PM from the where-do-we-go-now dept.

S3D writes "On 18 May 2004, Symbian, owner of the OS for high-end smartphones announced the formal launch of the Symbian Signed initiative for digitally signing and certifying Symbian applications that meet a set of test criteria. Gartner believes that Symbian Signed, in its current form, is a weak certification program oriented largely toward the needs of application publishers and network operators and may be inconvinient for developers. "

6 of 59 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

You'd think... by Short+Circuit · 2004-05-23 23:32 · Score: 4, Insightful

and may be inconvinient for developers.

...that they might have said the same thing about all the mandatory copy protection systems in place (or proposed) on devices. Like console systems. Or Palladium.

--
tasks(723) drafts(105) languages(484) examples(29106)
Seem Familiar? by lachlan76 · 2004-05-23 23:34 · Score: 5, Insightful

I think that I have heard this before...let me think...I'll get it...Microsoft Driver Signing. The point of that was to scare new users into buying alternate forms of hardware which have been produced by a manufacturer paid by Microsoft. While this isn't quite the same, it is restrictive to independant developers.
Re: The future of symbiam by manavendra · 2004-05-23 23:47 · Score: 2, Insightful

It might well be a weak certification program, but in the past developers have worked with some real crap and more often than not, debug entire libraries themselves and/or report to OEM vendors, etc.

So long as the owners of IP (and code), listen to developers and have a large enough pool of people to respond within reasonable times, the developer community over the world will embrace it AND provide it's feedback and suggestions

--
http://efil.blogspot.com/
False safety by Willeh · 2004-05-23 23:50 · Score: 3, Insightful

I believe this will create a lot of resentment towards Symbian in the long run. The testing basically only gives you a guarantee that it will not run up your phonebill and or delete your range of oh-so cool ringtones/ sounds/ wallpapers/ whatevers. As the Gartner article points out, no work is being done to ensure usability, or even if the product is useful.
It probably also means the developers get the green light to put huge "SYMBIAN APPROVED!!!!1" stickers on their products, which will be misleading to Joe Average PDA/CELL user. This in turn creates alot of resentment when the advertised product doesn't live up to the hype (that symbian indirectly helped create via the sticker), they will feel burned on the product and ultimately on Symbian products.
Hell, even MS certified drivers have snuck by that made stuff break.

--
Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
future of corepirate nazi payper liesense scams? by Anonymous Coward · 2004-05-24 00:00 · Score: 0, Insightful

lookout bullow. the daze of the glowbull warmongering, greed/fear/ego based felonious stock markup FraUD execrable, is dissolving into coolapps/the abyss, at the (increasing) speed of right.

all is not lost.

consult with/trust in yOUR creators.... the future's been bright, from the beginning. see you there?
Re:Symbian? by twalk · 2004-05-24 07:58 · Score: 2, Insightful

In the US, PalmOS is the leading Smartphone OS. Sales of the Treo600 have been so huge that they are beating Symbian and MS Smartphone combined, and so huge that Palm can't produce them fast enough to meet demand. (The Treo600 is practically non-existant in Europe.)