Slashdot Mirror


Napster Canada Launched

PunchMonkey writes "Just days after the Napster UK launch, Napster Canada is now online. Tracks start at CDN$1.19 and albums at CDN$9.95. Interactive streaming is also available for the first time in Canada for CDN$9.95 a month. Napster is the the third online music service to be launched in Canada (following PureTracks and ArchambaultZik), not including the branded Puretracks sites Sympatico Music Store and PureTracks from Telus." (Be prepared for a trio of rejection notices if you're neither running nor spoofing IE under Windows.)

6 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. CDN$1.19? by smonner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why would you start a new music service with higher prices than the existing competition? A lot of PureTracks' songs (though admittedly not all) are CDN$0.99. They must really be relying on name-brand recognition, though I doubt they are going to get much beyond "but, but, songs were free on Napster!" Still, nice to see competition, even if only of the inept kind. Now if they would just let me have my songs on both my home and work computers at the same time...

    1. Re:CDN$1.19? by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      a) Take a look at the selection of tracks available, Napster clearly beats them

      b) The unlimited download subscription is $9.95cdn (compared to $9.95USD for USA) which is kinda cool for canucks.

  2. Downloading seems legal; uploading might not be by Saucepan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Downloading is apparently legal in Canada, but uploading might not be.

    Canadians are currently permitted to borrow a friend's CD and make copies for personal, non-commercial use. However they are not allowed to make a copy for someone else. It is widely believed that this allows downloading but not uploading.

    The CRIA has launched John Doe lawsuits against uploaders but recently suffered a legal setback when a judge ruled that they had failed to provide sufficient evidence of a copyright violation to subpoena the identities of some anonymous uploaders. However, members of the federal government have promised new legislation to close what they call "legal loopholes". That may just have been election year pandering. We'll have to wait and see.

    In any case there are many Canadians who would willingly pay a reasonable amount per song to purchase music via download in order to get known quality, selection, and lack of liability. I would be one of them except that I refuse to pay money for DRM-encumbered files -- if I pay to buy something, I expect to own it.

  3. My version of the kick message by danigiri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sorry, my wallet is not currently compatible with your store.

    Napster is currently compatible with MS's flag OS's.
    Other OS's are not supported at this time and never will.

    If you are planning on getting me to spend my money on this store, the service will not be compatible and you should discontinue trying to do any business with me. If you will support *my* computer and *my* operating system, please continue.

    Ah, and MS will eat you for lunch, good luck.

  4. Re:$9.95? Used CDs still cheaper by CaptainPinko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've boughten majour label CDs such as Pearl Jam's vs. for as little as $5 CDN. Considering that at most places you can brin in CDs you don't want anymore for credit it becomes even cheaper. You'll bump into interesting people into music too and you can pick-up real bargains, indie-label, and out of print albums. I don't know how else you'd get a copy of Soundgarden's "Screaming Life/Fopp" EP

    For anyone in the London, ON region may I recommend you check out Dr. Disc or City Lights-- which is also a great used bookstore with a cool vibe.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  5. Please mod parent down: incorrect by Rumor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sorry, Chess, but you're referring to the same case as Saucepan, and the judge did not rule that uploading is legal. He expressed that it was similar to placing a photocopying machine in a library, yes, in an allusion to a recent Supreme Court of Canada case (CCH vs. Law Society of Upper Canada) but this opinion was purely obiter dicta, meaning that it does not have binding force. This case was tossed by the judge on evidentiary merits, or the lack thereof, so no new legal precedent has been set.

    At present, the law still suggests that uploading is a violation of copyright with no exemption under the Private Copying provision.