Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Flash 7 for Linux Released

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the long-time-coming dept.

molarmass192 writes "Looks like Macromedia has finally made good on their word and provided Linux with a current version of Flash player. Improvements over Flash 6 include a speed boost and support for SOAP. Here's the requisite download link. I took a few seconds to get it set up and the response is noticeably snappier than version 6. In particular, the audio/video sync problems in version 6 seems to have been taken care of. Now, I wonder where they hid that Shockwave player for Linux?"

11 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. Finally! by mrbarkeeper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like those Linux users finally get all the fun.

  2. Hmmm by FannyMinstrel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, I wonder where they hid that Shockwave player for Linux?

    /dev/null

    1. Re:Hmmm by B2382F29 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the filename for write, it's /dev/random for read.

      Actually that would be the place where windows longhorn is stored, for Shockwave, check /dev/zero

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    2. Re:Hmmm by sploo22 · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's not working for me...
      $ chmod +x /dev/null
      $ /dev/null
      It just hangs. These Macromedia people write really buggy software.
      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  3. Re:Now if only... by cujo_1111 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It works under WINE :)

    But seriously, is there enough of a market to justify the cost of a code port to Linux?

    --
    If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  4. Re:Now You Can Look At My Site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..and boy is it ugly! ;)

  5. Whoa... by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    props to Macromedia on this one.

    It's made it through (currently) six repetitions of Badgers with excellent synchronization (as opposed to version 6 not even making one). Hell, everything's so crisp and fluid... it's beyond further words.

    1. Re:Whoa... by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 2, Funny

      badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger MUSHROOM MUSHROOM!...

      --
      bananas like monkeys.
  6. Re:Read the EULA? by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Funny

    Morons. I would have sent it back reading

    3. You may not use the Software on a FUCKING LAN YOU GODDAMNED PEDANTIC GEEK-ASS DICKWEED or more than one PC.

    But, that's just me.

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  7. Re:What about never ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will it match the blazing speed at which Neverwinter Nights ran on my previous box? (1 frame every 5 seconds)

  8. Not Desktop USERS by soloport · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, this thread is about desktop developers... Uh... Oh...

    developers
    Developers
    deVelpers
    deVELOPERS
    DEVELOPERS
    DEVELOPERS
    DEVELOPERS!
    DEVELOPERS!!
    DEVELOPERS!!!

    Crap! He's got me doing it!