Slashdot Mirror


On Collaborative Weblogs

fernand0 writes "The 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism has dealt with some blogging issues (see the Symposium Research Papers). One that can be of interest for Slashdot readers is When the Audience is the Producer: The Art of the Collaborative Weblog (pdf). There, four collective weblogs are examined: MetaFilter, Plastic, Kuro5hin, and Slashdot, and some discussion is done about the different ways of collaboration that emerge from these sites."

9 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Did we really need a link to slashdot in the story by IchBinDasWalross · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, seriously folks, that's just stupid.

    --
    Mod "Overrated" instead of replying "I disagree with you," you coward.
  2. Audience is the Producer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure this makes for generally interesting articles/reading. The real value I see with these Blogs/sites is it's a cheap peer-review process. I have an idea. I submit my idea. I get immediate, high-volume feedback. Saves me publishing to a journal. At least the value can be had on the surface.

  3. Slashdot's collaboration.. by Hawkxor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ..ends with crowds of middle schoolers posting pointless inside jokes.

    I have been very impressed with ./'s moderation system, though. Plus Slashdot allows anyone to post what they want - so it can be read for humor and for knowledge. Entertaining and informative.

  4. wiki by galtenberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would Wiki not be considered a type of collaborative weblog?

    It happens a lot (too often) that Wiki is forgotten... in so many discussions on internet technology... when it's probably as r/evolutionary as email and chat. Maybe not, tho, maybe blogs are better, and maybe wikis are flawed in a way that they deserve to be ignored... not sure...

  5. Is /. truly a weblog? by Cloudmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does /. really count as a weblog anymore? For that matter, do any of the sites mentioned? It's a hard call - BoingBoing and similar sites seem to fit the bill for collaborative weblogs far better than discussion forums like /. I think the sites listed have really moved beyond weblog status. They really seem to be closer to forums and aggregators. This isn't a bad thing - it's just different and may require independant analysis. They've grown beyond (and in many cases existed before) what is commonly considered a weblog these days.

    Interestingly, this month's Wired had an article on weblogs / nanopublishing and highlighted a variety of collaborative weblogs, likely as a tie-in to the conference.

    --
    "Be proud to be a fighter" - Martial Arts Adage
  6. Re:Did we really need a link to slashdot in the st by DoctorDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not as stupid as the people that actually click on it.

    --
    Sig temporarily out of service.
  7. Re:Slashdot as a blog by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably because of the Journals ???

  8. Absent by KoriaDesevis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article talks a bit about the moderation system, and karma, and all the fun stuff we have come to love here at SlashDot. What it carefully avoids is the discussion of trolls and AC posts. It is summarized by stating that -1 in the moderation system is sufficient to render a troll invisible.

    Over time there have been a lot of discussions here about trolls and ACs. They have their place here, and they each contribute as well as take away. It would have been interesting to have read a little more about what the study found about trolls and AC posts, positive and negative...

  9. Re:Did we really need a link to slashdot in the st by McDutchie · · Score: 5, Funny
    I mean, seriously folks, that's just stupid.

    Not to mention dangerous! Who knows what kind of freaky loops the recursive Slashdot effect can get us into... it may cause warps in the time/space curve, or something!