Slashdot Mirror


SpaceShipOne 100 km Attempt Slated for June 21

apsmith writes "Scaled Composites has just announced their first attempt at breaking 100 km, scheduled for June 21. This would make it the first commercial manned vehicle to officially enter space. This is not quite an Ansari X prize attempt since it will carry only one person without the extra mass corresponding to the 3-person prize requirement; they have to give at least 30 days' notice for that. Past flight history is available from their site; the Discovery Channel is producing a documentary on the whole project, 'Rutan's Race For Space.'" Roger_Explosion adds "If successful, the craft - named Space Ship One - will become the world's first commercial manned space vehicle. Space Ship One will temporarily leave the earth's atmosphere, and the pilot (yet to be announced) will experience about three minutes of weightlessness."

11 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. First commercial or private? by kzinti · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If successful, the craft - named Space Ship One - will become the world's first commercial manned space vehicle.

    I believe that distinction goes to the Russians, who are the first to fly a paying customer in the flesh. It would be more correct to say that Space Ship One is the first privately developed manned craft to reach space. Until they fly a paying customer, I don't count Space Ship One as a vehicle of commerce. Just splitting hairs...

  2. Re:X Prize Claimed on July 4th, 2004? by twostar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except that they are not carrying the required three passengers on this flight. Depending on the outcome of this flight they will then plan for the Xprize.

    This is still experimental flight and they're minimizing personel risks.

  3. Re:I say... by October_30th · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This could be the beginning of the next Space Age.

    Perhaps, although I'm not so sure we should be so happy about corporations owning the space.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  4. Re:I say... by hpulley · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Perhaps, although I'm not so sure we should be so happy about corporations owning the space.

    We've already seen how the gov't owned it. Just how would "the people" own it instead of the gov't or a corporation?

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  5. Now that's what being a billionaire is all about! by mbessey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You've got to hand it to Paul Allen - here's a guy who knows what to do with more money than he could ever spend in his lifetime. Making it possible for other people to pursue their dreams and possibly improve the world for everyone is just about the best possible use for all that wealth.

    -Mark

  6. Re:more adds by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Corporations have been going into space since the 1960s. Did you think that your DirecTV dish is picking up signals from NASA?

    The reason this is big is that this is private manned spaceflight. As long as the government has a stranglehold on who does and doesn't qualify for space, then there can be no real human expansion. The sooner private interests are getting into space (eventually it'll be orbit, then beyond) the sooner we'll have meaningful colonization of places like the moon and Mars. This is vital to the survival of the species, as long as we're all stuck on this rock, the next comet or solar flare can wipe us all out.

  7. Commercial space craft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not correct - the ship carries no cargo nor paying passengers so it's not "commercial".

    "Private space craft" would be a more correct term.

  8. It's the commercial version of Mercury by Teahouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember, we are talking about commercial space travel starting from the same point as NASA's Mercury program. They are taking evolutionery steps just like NASA did. Currently, the X-Prize is for a sub-orbital system. Once that has been accomplished, I have heard that they plan on offering a $20 mill prize for the first orbital flight.

    Just like the beginning fo powered flight, governments have held all the cards and technology till now. What you are seeing is the highly efficent start of commercial space ventures. They will evolve through vehicles much faster than NASA did because they already have more knowledge to build on, and they also have the ability to make changes and adjustments faster and cheaper than a bureauracy like NASA. NASA isn't projected to have a new man-rated vehicle for another decade, and at the cost of BILLIONS. It is likely that before they accomplish that, the commercial industry will catch up and have a 4-man orbital vehicle by the end of this decade.

    Finally, the dollars will be there. Right now, if you asked NASA to get you into a sub-orbital launch, it would probably cost them $100 million minimum in development to get you there. Your price tag might be as high as 10-15 million. Rutan is doing it for less than 5 million (that's including vehicle development) and your price (once operable) will be about $80-100K per launch. Once these cheap methods are solidified, I could see an orbital flight dropping down to a $10-12K price tag for 4-5 orbits. If they get it that low, then space tourism will be the economic demand this industry is hoping. Hell, I would pay $20k to go into orbit!

    What I am saying is that you need to be a little patient. These companies will get you there far cheaper than NASA, and in a much shorter amount of time. This is just the beginning, but all things will come.

    An old NASA saying is "space is difficult", it should really be "space is easy, bureauracy is difficult".

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  9. Re:Now that's what being a billionaire is all abou by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Worried about world hunger, poverty, and the uneducated masses. Sell your computer and give the money to them. Really the problems of world hunger, poverty, and the uneducated masses will not be solved by throwing money at them. Most hunger is not caused by lack of money to feed people. It is caused by politics, poverty? There will always be poor but the crushing poverty that you often see is not going to be solved by throwing money at the problem. The uneducated masses? Truth is books are pretty cheap these days and you do not have broadband and P4s to be educated. The old "we can put a man on the moon but we can't...feed the poor, cure the common cold, or take your pick" statment is old and tired. How about this on. "We can't put a man on the moon any more! Are you happy!"

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  10. Re:I say... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're aware that "corporation" is just a legal code-word for "a bunch of people working together", aren't you? Slashdot's rabid, emotional anti-corporatism is as bad as the environmental movement's knee-jerk anti-nuclear stance.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  11. Re:Is there a next step? by tekrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who ask this probably have a poor understanding of aviation history.

    Let me ask you:
    Was the Wright brothers' plane a special purpose vehicle or a general lift vehicle?

    Was the 'Spirit of St. Louis' scalable to larger flights with more people/cargo, or once it was proven that you could fly to France, did other people build craft that would do the job?

    Was the Bell X-1 scaled up to accomodate more than just the test pilot?

    Consider that breaking the sound barrier was first done in a rocket-plane, something that has NEVER been used for large passenger carrying craft. The Concorde flew Mach2 on jet engines, not rockets.

    The purpose, as I see it, of SS1 and the X-Prize in general, is to spurr activity in this sector of engineering, which will hopefully lead to revolutionary new craft and even perhaps some new and exciting propulsion systems, advanced materials for absorbing and disappating heat, rapid prototyping, and more rugged avionics.

    Once it's been proven that space can be reached relatively cheaply, it's only a matter of time before companies spring up to take advantage of this opportunity.

    This vehicle is a test-craft, much like the original Wright-flyer. It's a proof of concept. It's the next step in aviation.

    And if nothing else, imagine if Rutan offered a kit version, like the Long EZ, that you could purchase for ... say... 20 million.

    I'd start saving my pennies if I were you.

    Also please remember that once upon a time, flying by jet was horribly expensive compared to prop-aircraft, hence the term "jet set" to describe rich people.

    Eventually, development in this area reduced the cost of flying by jet, and now, you can hop a plane to just about anywhere in the world for a reasonable amount.

    Space travel or Suborbital travel will start out expensive, but over time, as there is more development, it will eventually get cheaper.

    I think FEDEX will invest in such a system before airlines do, but if you can get a package from NYC to Hong Kong in 3 hours, it's only a matter of time before companies start trying to get their executives from NYC to Hong Kong in 3 hours.

    SS1 is the start of all this. It's not meant to be the final design of a larger craft any more than the X-1 was the final design for some larger supersonic craft.

    Instead, SS1 is the stepping stone for design work to bring us that larger suborbital craft, that may be based on entirely different technology.

    I hope this answers your question.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.