Slashdot Mirror
On Futureproofing Spamhaus
BMcWilliams writes "Spamhaus director Steve Linford announced a new funding plan Tuesday. According to Linford's announcement, large ISPs and big corporate users of the Spamhaus zone transfer service (renamed the Spamhaus Data Feed Service) will be required to pay an annual subscription fee ranging between $190 and $14,500.(The free public-query mirrors will continue to exist.) The point of the new plan is to ensure that 'the millions of users who rely on our anti-spam systems can be assured we'll be here for as long as spammers plague the Internet'."
Kind of a random number, that.
Thanks, jackass. Friggin' trolls.
Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
Any way to stop this rampant trolling?
Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
Just follow these easy steps:
brilliant. *applauds*
u r not special. u r not a beautiful or unique snowflake. u r the same decaying organic matter as everything else.
We need an open source e-mail solution!
Hopefully just as OSS can fix OS, maybe OSS can fix e-mail... I hope.
P.S. Whoever invented e-mail has a good intention, is just that greedy bastard (including the large corporation) always want to squeeze in a few bucks if they can get them for free at the expense to the rest of the society.
This is the dark-side of captalism...
Although it's still better then communism...
I'm leaning more towards socialism... US is more socialism then capitalism now what with the welfare and social security system...
In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
You only get one email a day? See that is my theory most of the spam is from newsletters you don't remember signing up for... but then again they are tricky about getting you to sign up for them but if you read and are carefull you don't end up with that much spam Unfortantly I am neither carefull or read everything so i get tons of spam. Sucks for me
just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
click here
wi74 the laundry
Recently, Sun Microsystems and Microsoft have been pushing a vision of the future in which computing hardware is free -- actually, sold with software subscriptions. IT customers tempted to sign on should take a lesson from the recent box-office bomb Troy and beware of suits bearing gifts. Because it's very clear that this version of free hardware will actually be controlled hardware -- controlled, specifically, to effectively seize control of the customer's operation.
At first sight, their pitch might sound attractive. IT shops don't care about hardware or software in isolation; they're customers for a bundled good, the capability to store and process information. Why not rent a bundle with a low monthly cost, hardware and software both serviced by the same vendor and no hardware-to-software integration problems?
There's a clue that something is amiss here in the underlying economics. Hardware has a relatively high fixed unit cost because you have to push bulk matter around to make it and deploy it where it's needed. Software is just bits that can be copied perfectly and fly over a cable at lightspeed. Therefore it appears that a world of free software and costly hardware makes more sense than one of costly software and free hardware. This turns out not to change when you look at the expected investment to produce the first copy of a hardware or software design. So why are Sun and Microsoft reversing the proposition?
The key background fact is that Sun's market share is collapsing under pressure from white-box vendors, and Microsoft is losing its highest-margin corporate customers in places like the financial-services industry to Linux. The Gartner Group reported that Linux server shipments showed 57% growth in 1Q2004 alone. Over the same period, Sun's revenues slumped 12%. The recent Sun-Microsoft pact is a defensive circling of the wagons. Anything that they say has to be evaluated as an attempt to regain the market control they have been losing.
The devil in their Free Hardware story is, at least at first, in the details. Anyone who believes a vendor is going to give away hardware under a contract that allows the customer to immediately strip off the software and repurpose it probably still hasn't faced the truth about the Tooth Fairy. There are really only two scenarios here; either the hardware will be so cheap that the customer would get no gain from the deal, or (if it has real value) the lease contract will have a clause requiring that it be used only with the specified software.
Most likely the whole bundle would be structured as a lease deal -- the vendor retains ownership of both hardware and software. And there is the gotcha -- because under those assumptions, the vendor wouldn't just own a critical piece of your infrastructure, they'd get an even harder hammerlock on it than traditional proprietary software licenses give them.
Are you doubting this? Then consider where you are if the vendor decides to pile on more restrictions on what you can do with the machine, such as a prohibition on third-party apps and DRM to enforce it. You couldn't very well object. They're only protecting their investment, after all -- it's not your property.
Not your property. Owning things may be inconvenient, but without ownership you lose control. Jonathan Schwartz and Bill Gates don't want you to notice that connection; they want you to let their free Trojan horse inside the walls, to lose ownership of your IT infrastructure and give control of it to them. If you make that decision, you'll pay for it in ever more restrictive lock-in and ever-higher future prices.
What's the alternative? Open-source software over commodity hardware; you own it all, and neither Sun nor Microsoft controls a single bit of your information. This latest propaganda initiative of theirs is a desperation maneuver, because if the notoriously conservative Gartner Group's figures are correct IT managers have seen the way out and are escaping the proprietary prison in droves now.
This Trojan horse will very likely be burnt on the beach, as King Priam should have done to Agamemnon's men. One wonders what invasive tactic Sun and Microsoft will think up next.
first avoid going won't vote in I burnt out. I lead to 'cleaner yes, I work for And other party been the best, States that there GNAA and support a BSD box that your own beer and arms and dick If you move a table [slashdot.org], on an endeavour they want you to are there? Oh, FrreBSD showed Romeo and Juliet