Slashdot Mirror


New Viruses Hit 30-Month High

Mz6 writes "InformationWeek reports that Sophos has analysed and protected against 959 new viruses in May, this is the highest number of new viruses discovered in a single month since December 2001. From Sophos' own TopTen list they continue on to say that the 'Sasser and Netsky worms may have captured the headlines. ...May has seen a noticeable spike in cybercriminal activity, suggesting that even the arrest of Sven Jaschan ...has done nothing to curb the problem.'"

9 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Too bad by frankmanowar · · Score: 5, Funny

    That Sophos antivirus has the somewhat incredible problem of not being able to remove and clean viruses on an infected host... but hey, at least we know they're there.

    --

    "Other bands play, but Manowar KILLS"
  2. Yeah, but... by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Funny
    as was stated in many after school specials back in my day...

    "Kowing is half the battle!"

    On a totally unrelated note.. is it bad when you post comments to your own stories?

    --
    Hmmm.
  3. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the school semester ends in May. What are all those CS graduates supposed to do in between being rejected for an interview and filling in a McDonald's application!

  4. gawd by abscondment · · Score: 3, Funny

    that explains the porn advertisement posts on my blog with IPs tracing back to infected machines all over the world...

    damn those script kiddies.

  5. HAZMAT by chaffed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm investing in a hazmat licence with all the infections I see on enduser computers.

    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
  6. Or did a new virus hit virus tracking databases by seanscottrogers · · Score: 3, Funny

    to boost virus levels 30 months ago to never before seen heights.

  7. Re:Do they not track anybody other than Win32? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Give it time! 64 bit Windows isn't even widely available yet. Sheesh!

  8. Yes, but... by gillbates · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many of these affect Linux?

    Oh, right.

    And how is this news? Windows users expect to get hit by viruses; this is nothing new.

    When Linux starts getting hit, then I'll take notice.

    All those people who claim that Linux is ready for the desktop conveniently forget that it still doesn't support anywhere near the number of viruses that Windows does. A single release of Windows contains more virus enablement than all releases of Linux combined. When it comes down to it, Linux won't ever break into the desktop mainstream until Linus improves support for viruses.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  9. Re:Do they not track anybody other than Win32? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

    no, W32/ is a standard prefix for virus names, it just exists so you know it is a virus name

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.