Slashdot Mirror


Should The FCC Be Abolished?

stwrtpj writes "CNET is running an interesting commentary from its chief political correspondent explaining why the FCC should be abolished. When I saw this link from NewsForge, my initial reaction was that he was full of it, but after I RTFA, I have to admit that he makes some interesting points. So how about it? Should the FCC be abolished? Can the market regulate itself yet?"

4 of 801 comments (clear)

  1. Re:fcc is a necessary body by red+floyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    \i{The fcc exists primary to ensure radio waves continue to exist}

    I think Mr. Maxwell already took care of that.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  2. Re:No by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 5, Funny

    The logic of a slashdot reader: 1. [reads link] no way 2. [clicks link] how will i be pursuaded today? 3. [reads the first sentence] "The reason is simple. The venerable FCC, created in 1934, is no longer necessary." 4. [convinced] "I have to admit that he makes some interesting points. So how about it? Should the FCC be abolished?" 5. [takes action] "i'm starting a petition!"

  3. Re:fcc is a necessary body by damiam · · Score: 4, Funny
    Mammary glands cause underwear tents.

    Not Janet Jackson's.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  4. right. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Do you actually look at girls and say to yourself "I know what is underneath her clothes". Its disturbing that you even think that way. Spooky."

    Are you telling me you don't know what a naked woman looks like? Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."