SCO Says No Way To a GPL Solaris, Moves Trial Back
penguino writes "Looks like it didn't take long for SCO to formally respond to claims by Sun that it will open source Solaris. According to SCO 'they [Sun] still have licence restrictions that would prevent them from contributing our licensed works wholesale to the GPL'. The company has also released a statement dated June 8 that 'SCO is making a motion to move the scheduled trial date to September 2005 and split IBM's counterclaims into a separate case'. Also quoted is AUUG president and FreeBSD developer Greg Lehey who recommends 'that the best thing for IBM to do would be to print out every single version as requested and send the resultant 20 tonnes or so of paper to SCO. That would keep them quiet for a while'."
try this strange brew, that's good for you, & freely distributable too.
...so why not SCO as well?
Ross Winn "not just another ugly face..."
I think its funny....
seriously, I think somebody has their sarcasm/humor detector broken.
If you modded doug down, think about it this way--it would have been just as funny with almost any other politician's name instead of John Kerry. If you had happened to dislike said politician, mr. moderator, then you probably would have marked it as funny, not flamebait.
for me, it's hilarious. I would have still laughed if he had said bush, but not as hard. Why not? Bush, despite his many other failings, is not known for his reversals of position in the same way that Kerry is. So it's not as funny.
WIth Kerry's name, however, its amusing. Not politically correct, but I don't really think its flamebait either.
"We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
I don't know about the rest of you, but I think nature is pretty swell. Forests are beautiful. Some of the best places on our planet.
'that the best thing for IBM to do would be to print out every single version as requested and send the resultant 20 tonnes or so of paper to SCO. That would keep them quiet for a while'.
Do we _really_ need to encourage wholesale destruction of every tree on our planet for something so incredibly stupid as the assholes at SCO? Seriously, can't you just electronically send all that code? DVDs or something? Just a small handful of them would be all that's needed, if you need more than one at all.
umm, since when is it considered offtopic to correct ones own statement?