Slashdot Mirror


Old Geek Invents New Stick

the morgawr writes "According to the EE Times and Science Blog, a scientist at University of Rhode Island has developed a new type of antenna design that, by increasing the efficiency, performs as well as the convential quarter-wave design but is only 1/3 as large."

7 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. let it be said: patents at their best by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is patents at their best: the little guy innovates, and becomes the not-so-little guy in reward

    that should be the purpose of patents, to protect the little guy who innovates

    let us hope that we can back to this world, a world where patents reward innovation, instead of suppress it

    it is a delicate balance, but there are hordes of ip lawyers and corporate whores out there who are hard at work, having sold their conscience, hard at work warping the balance in the direction of those who don't deserve to be rewarded for suppressing true innovation like this

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:let it be said: patents at their best by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Hopefully it is innovative. A lot of people have played around with antennas over the years, especially amateurs trying to fit a big antenna in a small space. I'd be surprised if no one has tried something close to it.

      So let's hope it's not just a tweak of something that was in QST magazine thirty years ago.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  2. This could have a very positive... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    effect in the radio industry, where finding areas to put antennas is difficult due to population density, FAA regulations, etc. A more compact unit could be placed on taller buildings, essentially broadening the area that the signal could reach in urban areas.

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
  3. I was happy to see... by mobiux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the University of Rhode Island and the Physics dept were made beneficiaries of the patent.

    I can see this generating alot of revenue, and people (corporations) that may try to rip this off.
    At least they will have a vested interest in fighting for the patent.

  4. Microsoft/IBM can nab this by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IBM, Cisco, Microsoft or any other tech company can steal this patent by filing something akin to the following.

    "A Method for reducing the size of radio antennae by a quarter using new design UNDER THE CONTROL OF A SOFTWARE DRIVEN DEVICE."

    Remember, even if someone else has patented,invented,used,implemented,sold,issued,tho ugh and/or showed it to you first, if you jack it up to a computer, then you've got a patent pal! Now no one can connect a computer to this device without giving you money! Yippie!!

    Welcome to the US patent Office. Where dreams CAN come true!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  5. Can you say prior art? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the simplistic description given, this design has hundreds of thousands or prior art examples already sold in the marketplace, and has had for maybe 45 years.

    Most any CB'er that wasn't running a full 1/4 wave stick on the roof of his car, and getting it mangled by driving thru any overpass with less than 14 feet of clearance, was using a shortened antenna of this design. They were also a bit narrowband, having extreme difficulties in getting 1.3/1 or better vswr performance over the 40 channels of the cb band.

    They alsa radiate a disproportionate amount of their power well above the horizon, reducing the gain in the real world.

    New? Yeah, somewhat like me, I'll be 70 in a few months.

    I suspect that there are, or were (some having gone on to that big retirement party in the sky held for failed companies or merged into oblivion entities) plenty of patents that will prove prior art, if the patent office wasn't too understaffed and lazy to search for them. Avanti & HiGain are just 2 names that come to mind.

    Scuse me while I chuckle at yet another of the patent offices incompetant blunders.

    Cheers, Gene

  6. Re:Ham response by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that is because it goes agains all antenna and RF theory.

    Granted, I have seen antennas that defy logic until you really understand how they are working.... the Discone antenna for example... but this one still is baffling and the lack of details increases the skeptical thoughts... no explination at ALL on how it works, no theory explained other than "i did this... no you cant look at it!" responses...

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.