Who's Blocking Verified E-Voting?

ClarkEvans writes "The NY Times has a great editorial today calling out the League of Women Voters for their counter-productive lobbying against verified voting. The article states that Diebold voting systems has given lots of dough to these opposition groups." There's an AP story about the issue as well.

Comments

Re:Unfair election aspect #3 - Equal coverage

[mabu]

I'm voting for Michael Badnarik Libertarian, who is also on almost all of the ballots

1. Your vote would be better served if it was cast for the tooth fairy.

2. The Libertarians have no clue. They want "less government" but when you ask them how they'll maintain so many essential services for the people, they have no idea. I spoke with Harry Browne and he gave me the run-around. In theory, Libertarianism is nice, just like in theory it would be cool to be invisible or fly through the air like superman, but in either case, the likelihood that any of those ideas are practical is nonexistent.

Do us all a favor and wake up and smell the napalm and don't promote ridiculous candidates with ridiculous agendas.

Who says we can't have a simple solution?

[raehl]

Who says we can't have a simple solution?

RTFA: Women do.

Re:Your comment title is HOMOPHOBIC flamebait

[DroopyStonx]

Everyone gets offended at something. If you don't like my comment, then fuck off. I don't care. If someone gets offended by my comment title, then they have some problems of their own to work out.

In no way did I state that gay people are any less of a person than anyone else. I used it as an adjective, and if you can't understand that, you're an idiot.

You're like those fucking retards who got offended because Lord of the Rings had a title called "The Two Towers" to which they associated with 9/11.

Move on, get over it.