Slashdot Mirror


Government-Funded GPL Software

tgw writes "Tom Adelstein has an article in 'Linux Journal' on how a major milestone in US government-funded OSS recently passed - virtually unnoticed." Slashdot has mentioned this company earlier.

7 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. The wonders of CASH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    FSF is as corrupt as any other company. As soon as th emoneybag starts ringing as soon it's over with all their philosophy and other crap. Well cash makes argumenting easier.

  2. More Software for the World to Steel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    That's right! My US federal taxes went to fund the development of Unix, Internet protocol and now GPL software all to the world's benefit.

    Yet the world continues to hate the US ... I say we should stop handing out publicly funded technology!

  3. No Gov Funded Viral Code Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    BSDish licensing only please.

  4. Go hide under a rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    and learn to spell.

  5. I think OSS is an inevitable step... by James+A.+S.+Joyce · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...on the governmental software road. The simple fact is that proprietary systems gradually grow old, flaky, clunky, bloated and support is withdrawn from them (just witness the EOLs of various versions of Windows and Red Hat Linux we hear about here now and then). Open source software, on the other hand, can be hacked upon by anyone who wants to use it, any new functionality can be grafted on or removed, and the result can be redistributed for nothing? How can proprietary software complete? It's just that simple.

  6. Morally reprehensible. by Freston+Youseff · · Score: -1, Troll

    This "project's" funding is morally corrupt on the level of Iraq War II. John Locke is spinning in his grave.

    --

  7. Re:not the first by druhol · · Score: 0, Troll

    That doesn't count. It's not like the Canadians have a real governemnt; don't be silly.

    --
    WWD4D?