Slashdot Mirror


Cory Doctorow on Digital Rights Management

VerdeRana writes "I just heard the EFF's Cory Doctorow give this fantastic argument critiquing DRM. He makes a great case for why DRM is bad for society, business, and artists, why it simply don't work, and why Microsoft (the audience for this talk) should not invest in it. Broadcast this far and wide, and maybe someone will listen."

1 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. ***ARTICLE TEXT*** by ArbiterOne · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Microsoft Research DRM talk
    Cory Doctorow
    cory@eff.org
    June 17, 2004
    This text is dedicated to the public domain, using a Creative Commons public domain dedication:
    > Copyright-Only Dedication (based on United States law) The person or persons who have associated their work with this
    > document (the "Dedicator") hereby dedicate the entire copyright
    > in the work of authorship identified below (the "Work") to the
    > public domain.
    > Dedicator makes this dedication for the benefit of the public at
    > large and to the detriment of Dedicator's heirs and successors.
    > Dedicator intends this dedication to be an overt act of relinquishment in perpetuity of all present and future rights
    > under copyright law, whether vested or contingent, in the Work.
    > Dedicator understands that such relinquishment of all rights
    > includes the relinquishment of all rights to enforce (by lawsuit
    > or otherwise) those copyrights in the Work.
    > Dedicator recognizes that, once placed in the public domain, the
    > Work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, used,
    > modified, built upon, or otherwise exploited by anyone for any
    > purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and in any way, including
    > by methods that have not yet been invented or conceived.
    -----------
    Greetings fellow pirates! Arrrrr!
    I'm here today to talk to you about copyright, technology and
    DRM, I work for the Electronic Frontier Foundation on copyright
    stuff (mostly), and I live in London. I'm not a lawyer -- I'm a
    kind of mouthpiece/activist type, though occasionally they shave
    me and stuff me into my Bar Mitzvah suit and send me to a
    standards body or the UN to stir up trouble. I spend about three
    weeks a month on the road doing completely weird stuff like going
    to Microsoft to talk about DRM.
    --
    I lead a double life: I'm also a science fiction writer. That
    means I've got a dog in this fight, because I've been dreaming of making my living from writing since I was 12 years old. Admittedly, my IP-based biz isn't as big as yours, but I guarantee you that it's every bit as important to me as yours is
    to you.

    Here's what I'm here to convince you of:

    1. That DRM systems don't work
    2. That DRM systems are bad for society
    3. That DRM systems are bad for business
    4. That DRM systems are bad for artists
    5. That DRM is a bad business-move for MSFT

    It's a big brief, this talk. Microsoft has sunk a lot of capital into DRM systems, and spent a lot of time sending folks like Martha and Brian and Peter around to various smoke-filled rooms
    to make sure that Microsoft DRM finds a hospitable home in the future world. Companies like Microsoft steer like old Buicks, and
    this issue has a lot of forward momentum that will be hard to soak up without driving the engine block back into the driver's
    compartment. At best I think that Microsoft might convert some of that momentum on DRM into angular momentum, and in so doing, save
    all our asses.
    Let's dive into it.
    --
    1. DRM systems don't work

    This bit breaks down into two parts:

    1. A quick refresher course in crypto theory
    2. Applying that to DRM

    Cryptography -- secret writing -- is the practice of keeping
    secrets. It involves three parties: a sender, a receiver and an
    attacker (actually, there can be more attackers, senders and
    recipients, but let's keep this simple). We usually call these
    people Alice, Bob and Carol.

    Let's say we're in the days of the Caesar, the Gallic
    War. You need to send messages back and forth to your generals,
    and you'd prefer that the enemy doesn't get hold of them. You can
    rely on the idea that anyone who intercepts your message is
    probably illiterate, but that's a tough bet to stake your empire
    on. You can put your messages into the hands of reliable
    messengers who'll chew them up and swallow them if captured --
    but that doesn't help you if Brad Pitt a