Slashdot Mirror


WinXP SP2 Sacrifices Compatibility for Security

goldragon writes "TechRepublic is reporting that "Microsoft is pulling out all the stops to improve security. So much so, in fact, that it will cause many problems because SP2 will de-emphasize backward compatibility with legacy systems and code for the sake of security." One small step forward for Microsoft, one giant leap backwards for mankind?"

7 of 773 comments (clear)

  1. Pah. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Better than having yet more spam zombies and pwned newbies.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  2. Re:Compatibility Woes? by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    AMEN!!!!!!

    Why should Microsoft bare the burden of making sure other people's code works? It's not like MS isn't helping them by getting SDKs, DDKs, and APIs out there as fast as they are available.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
  3. Re:Compatibility Woes? by bugmenot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I couldn't agree more.

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  4. In the SP?? by eheldreth · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dont get me wrong, I think M$ should completly overhall there security. However, is a service pack the correct time to do this. If M$ breaks programs people need they may not upgrade and that could cause even more security problems. Maybe such a change should wait for the next release of windows(oh, say 2015 or so).

    --
    The perversity of the Universe tends towards a maximum. - O'Toole's Corollary
  5. Damned if they do by John+the+Kiwi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and damned if they don't.

  6. Re:Surprise Surprise by VividU · · Score: 0, Redundant

    M$

  7. By god by alexborges · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Follow the money!

    No backwards compatibility, more migration towards us.

    Thats the ballmer way of bussiness

    --
    NO SIG