Slashdot Mirror


Intel Puts the Lock on Overclocking

Patrick Schmid writes "Intel included an overclocking-prevention mechanism into the 915/925 chipsets. So far, only Asus and Gigabyte know how to override it. You can start from the beginning or jump to where we discuss the overclocking lockout."

22 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. AMD fanboys everywhere by gooberguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rejoice!

    --


    Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    1. Re:AMD fanboys everywhere by Luveno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given the monster HSF on most Athlons, "fanboy" takes on a double meaning.

  2. News Flash by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Funny

    Company restricts product in an artificial way, and other people find ways around it.

    In other news, people breathe.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:News Flash by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Funny

      People breathe!? Good God what is this country coming to!

      *runs to go turn grandma's oxygen back on*

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  3. WHOA. Wait just a fortnight here. by piecewise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry, Intel, but you're keeping us from overclocking chips when you yourself have created some of the most inefficient (in terms of optimal performance and energy/heat useage) microprocessor of anyone this decade?

    They've been hanging out with Microsoft too long.

    That's like a car manufacturer saying, "We've installed a mechanism which will keep you from opening the hood if your intention is to upgrade the engine, because we want you leasing and buying new expensive cars very soon."

    Uhhh, f*ck off.

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  4. LOCKOUT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I DONT SEE WY WINTEL CARES IF I OVERCLOACK MY COMPUTAR! ITS MY WARRANTY I AM FEEDING TO TEH THERMAL DIETY!

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

    1. Re:LOCKOUT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you are why kids on the short bus should not be allowed on the computer...

      please put your helmet back on and play nice with the other "special children"

      I'm thinking we need to up your medication also....

  5. Re:Argh... english! by Adalgar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see nothing wrong with that statement.

  6. Re:Market Share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you think this post needs to be modded down, try using the reply button instead.

    I guess that might work. Moderators, please mod above post down (and thanks for the tip drsmack1).

  7. Only terrorists overclock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the link between overclockers and Al-Queda is quite clear. There has been multiple contacts detailed and documented between the two but unfortunately for security reasons I cannot disclose them. So you'll just have to trust me on this one... if you overclock, we will invade you Mr. Terrorist Osama.

  8. Re:Argh... english! by BabyDave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Try this:

    ... the required PLL will reset and won't not refuse to reverse-unlock that frequency

    Clearer?

  9. Re:as if... by halivar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...as if it was still useful at speeds above 3GHz.

    Amen, brother. And let's not forget the whole RAM debacle. Some of those silly nay-sayers are still carping on about needing more than 640K of memory.

    People just need to learn to run ONE application at a time, like any other normal, rational human being! Sheesh, the GUI business has ruined you kids.

  10. Re:Argh... english! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 3, Funny
    In that case we'd just have to randomly fluctuate the field harmonics while flooding the deck with theta radiation and subjecting the processor to a stream of chroniton particles in reverse polarity. That's so simple an ensign could do it!

    [/Star Trek Solution]

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  11. Re:Over Clocking is over Rated by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, and my uptime IN WINDOWS is about a month.

    No, your uptime is actually 24.2 days, it's just that the clock has been overclocked too...

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  12. Re:Over Clocking is over Rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    yeah pushing a system beyond its specs can't hurt.
    {Cranks up his 5 GHz computer with 100,000 rpm hard drive}
    inautable mumbling is heard over the roar of the computer
    {computer explodes}
    {police find greasy spot and lots of fried electronics}

  13. Numerical Superstitions by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's amusing that Intel is afraid of using the number 666 (evidenced by the Pentium 3 667, and now the DDR667 memory). Not that I blame them, the fundies would probably call for a boycott of their products if they labeled them correctly in this circumstance.

  14. Re:Over Clocking is over Rated by devphaeton · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, and my uptime IN WINDOWS is about a month.


    Going a month without doing Windows Update is not recommended

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  15. Re: market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it blows up the user's box

    What do you think this is, star trek? Maybe you can convince it of an illogical proposition, causing it to blow up in a huge cloud of smoke.

    The amount of explosive material inside a standard CPU is quite small. Unless that's how they're stopping the overclockers, hmmm....

  16. Nigel Tufnel's amplifier by amightywind · · Score: 2, Funny

    When someone mentions CPU overclocking it brings to mind Nigel Tufnel of Spinal Tap taking about his why his guitar amplifier volume knob goes from 0 to 11. "If it is set to 10, there is nowhere left to go, is there? 11 is for that extra push, over the cliff..."

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  17. Re:First Dual-Core Hotplates, then locking? by Generic+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
    First It comes out that Intel's making Dual Core Prescotts what would do better as hotplates than processors, and now they're announcing that they're preventing you from overclocking?


    I would think there is more than a casual relationship between the two, perhaps just to prevent their "hotplates" from becoming open-flame barbeque pits.
    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
  18. If this is true... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I doubt if it's true, AMD stock holders are smiling!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  19. Re:Support by Saeger · · Score: 2, Funny
    Remember people who would run the Add New Hardware Wizard in Windows 95 to add stuff they didn't have?

    These "dumb" people were just ahead of their time. They'll get the last laugh in 2015 when they attach a DRM-free GNU Molecular Assembler to their system and the "Add New Hardware Wizard" actually works! :)

    "Hey, free computer equipment! Free diamonds! Free food! And free solar cells to power it all from the Sun! And a free molecular recycler! I am an island!"

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful