Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Changes Protocol, Blocks Third Party Clients

NaDrew writes "ZDNet reports that Yahoo is once again blocking connections from Trillian (the alternative multi-protocol client). Yahoo tried this a few times last year and it looks like they're trying again. Cerulean, maker of Trillian, employs some excellent protocol engineers, who I have no doubt will quickly figure out Yahoo's latest obfuscation and release a patch. A quick fix discovered late this evening: Change your Y!IM host from scs.msg.yahoo.com to scs.yahoo.com, port 5050, and it should work. This is on Trillian 0.74H, not Pro."

17 of 506 comments (clear)

  1. Centericq is also broken by RickL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Centericq is also broken. I'd be happy to use an official Yahoo! IM client...if they had one that was console-based.

    1. Re:Centericq is also broken by micromoog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't want to run the AIM client AND the MSN client AND the Yahoo! client. So I use Trillian.

    2. Re:Centericq is also broken by Nugget · · Score: 5, Informative
      Then what you want is bitlbee. Seriously, it's precisely what you're looking for.

      bitlbee lets you connect to all the major IM networks using your normal irc client. When your mouth-breating, non-irc-using friends send you an instant message, it shows up just as a normal irc privmsg and you can respond in kind.

  2. Damn... by N3koFever · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...and I wanted to speak with all the people I know who use Yahoo Messenger.

    Oh, wait...

  3. Kopete also by onree · · Score: 5, Informative

    Haven't been able to connect to Yahoo via Kopete since the block.

  4. The business case sadly makes sense by spoonani · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the Open-source people here usually have a hard time comprehending why someone like yahoo would do this, consider the following. Ad revenue from y! Instant Messenger: $$$ As revenue from user connected to trillian: 0 Of course yahoo understands that their client may not be the best out there, yet without any additional ad revenues it makes it tough to explain to upper management that it is worth allowing any old client to connect.

  5. PLEASE NOTE by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yahoo tried this a few times last year and it looks like they're trying again.

    I could dig up the older comments/articles which thoroughly contradict this troll-ish article summary but I don't think it deserves my time.

    Yahoo did not, I repeat did *not* try to "block" third party IM clients "several times last year". *All* they did was upgrade their protocol for better reliability/etc (I have personally noticed the increase in reliability/refresh rate etc). It is up to the 3rd party developers to upgrade their protocols if Yahoo decides to do so.

    And Yahoo did offer to help them fix their stack to help it work with their servers. I am not affiliated to Yahoo, btw - I just think it receives a lot more undeserved flak then it should.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:PLEASE NOTE by wfberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yahoo did not, I repeat did *not* try to "block" third party IM clients "several times last year". *All* they did was upgrade their protocol for better reliability/etc (I have personally noticed the increase in reliability/refresh rate etc). It is up to the 3rd party developers to upgrade their protocols if Yahoo decides to do so.

      Right. It's an unfortunate side-effect.
      They're also forcing all their users that DO use the Yahoo! approved clients to upgrade to their new client. A client with more bloat, more featuritis. No choice for the lowly user in all this. Yet the entire value of their messenger service is the number of people on it. That's the only reason 3rd party apps are made; people want to talk to other people who are on the Yahoo network. Instead of recognizing their users, even if they don't pay for the privilege of using the network, as a valuable asset, they treat them like, well, sheeple. Especially if you happen to be on a third party client.

      Even AOL treats third party clients better, by "supporting" an oudated version of their protocol. It might not have all the whizz-bang features, but it keeps even those damn geek hippies on the network, which is a good thing for all those involved, really.

      How would you feel if Microsoft suddenly changed the "hotmail" protocol, so you could send e-mail to any one on hotmail, or receive any from them? Even if it's your girlfriend, or your mother?

      How about if your telephone company suddenly won't let you connect to the bad side of town? All those free phonecalls cost em, you know?

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  6. What about the law? by cculianu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, does anyone know if this is just a protocol upgrade or if yahoo! is really trying to get rid of the third party clients?

    If they want to get rid of 3rd party clients, then this is just another arms race, meaning we will eventually have open clients that work, after some finite delay.

    In all honesty I can't blame yahoo! for trying. After all, for each person that doesn't see the ads associated with their official client, they lose revenue.

    Yahoo! is a great site and they provide a LOT of stuff for free, so I don't blame them for trying to get some money back for all the free stuff they have given us over the years. I guess since IMing is so popular and so much time is spent in the IM client, to them that's a LOT of missing eyeballs over a long period of time that don't get to see the ads. That's a lot of money lost by the minute. And let's face it.. we are using their computers for free, and not giving anything back each time we use a third party client.

    My question though, is that if they hate third party IM clients for cutting into their rev. stream, why don't they take the law out of their own hands and use the law to their advantage? Is there nothing that could be done, by drafting some clever EULA or something, that would make it illegal or something like that to use 3rd party clients? That might actually dampen the efforts with libyahoo and other projects that try to develop an open protocol lib. Sourceforge might even cease to host such projects, being that they are in the realm of piracy or accorting to the DMCA.

    While it would suck for me (as I love to use centericq over their stupid client), why don't they just make it illegal to use third party clients?

  7. A word of advice... by baudilus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't log out.

  8. Re:Why do they bother? by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because strangely enough Yahoo as a company would like to make a profit. They provide some excellent free services to users and are heavily reliant on advertising revenue from these to generate income to fund their operations. Yes the adds can be be a tad annoying but I get a very good email and IM service for free so I am not going to complain. 3rd party clients cut out a potential source of revenue for Yahoo so while there is money involved for them they will always bother.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  9. Re: Yahoo Changes Protocol, Blocks Third Party Cli by manavendra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In an era where instant messaging is touting as the "next big thing", most service providers are always faced with the dilemma of whether to allow third party clients to connect, or prevent.

    Messaging clients with advertisement-based model will surely object to allowing third party clients to connect, since it doesnt make any business sense.

    Furthermore, they may have allowed such third party clients in the past, to gain that critical mass that ensures market peneration and continued usage, but once they are past the bell curve, they would then clam down on it.

    Think of it as an equivalent to Microsoft clamping down on piracy - they never prevented that in the past knowing that so long as its their products being used, they will be able to generate revenues one way or the other. Now that the market penetration is coming to a saturation (or if not, there are far more alternative solutions available than ever before), they have started to really put on the squeeze.

    Finally, companies like trillian may well have the best protocol engineers in the world, but such disruptions in service shall push away customers every time, however small the percentage might be. Unless connectivity to widely used messengers is provided by agreement, such connectivity outages will cause most users to move to move away from them.

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  10. Google by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny


    Makes you just itch for a google client doesn't it?

    'Cause if it's Google it must be good!

    GMail - like turning on the lights and watching the cockaroaches scatter!

  11. Re:pfft by ambrosine10 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the latest Yahoo Messenger client for Windows has no ads at all.

  12. Yahoo Profit from Ads? What Ads?! by LordKazan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Everyone keeps talking about how Yahoo wants to profit from the ads in it's Y! Messenger Software. What Ads? Unless you look at the other screens [you known the non-chat ones] you will not see any other ads

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  13. Re:Why do they bother? by SilentChris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "3rd party clients cut out a potential source of revenue for Yahoo"

    Actually, 3rd party clients are the ONLY way they receive revenue from some of us. I keep a Yahoo and Hotmail email account. I rarely IM anyone outside of AIM. Trillian's checking of Yahoo email drives me to their site (where I see their ads). No checking, I don't go as often to check my mail. They lose money. As far as I'm concerned, Yahoo is shooting themselves in the foot.

  14. Trillian Patches Available by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Trillian guys have fixed it. You can grab the patches(Trillian Pro 2.013 & Trillian Basic Patch I) from the Trillian download page.