Slashdot Mirror


Official Firefly Movie Web Site Launched

The Orange Hatter writes "The official Universal Pictures web site for the Firefly Movie 'Serenity' is up. It includes a blog, message board, opportunites to get point for Firefly swag, and lots of other fun stuff. Check it out."

14 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. FireFly DVD set is great - why did Fox cancel? by PenguinOpus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't watch any of the episodes on Fox because I hadn't even discovered Buffy yet. 6 seasons of DVD Buffy later (waiting for the 7th), we buy Firefly's DVD set and were really impressed.

    Firefly, the series, has the usual Joss Whedan good characters interacting in interesting ways.
    Apparently they didn't show the pilot first on Fox and I can't imagine how that could have worked. The 2 hour pilot (also called Serenity) is a must see and its CGI special effects are surprisingly good.

    15 episodes (pilot + 13) + extras.

    Strongly Recommended!

  2. Is this "just" the first episode, remade? by Jerf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See title. All the summaries seem to point to that but that seems odd.

    I'm not sure how I feel about that, either way.

  3. Re:Pathetically stupid web designers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Offtopic: I haven't looked at the Firefly web page, but you definitely should grab the "Ghost in the shell 2" trailer.

  4. Obligatory Ballad of Serenity by methangel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take my love
    Take my land
    Take me where I cannot stand
    I don't care
    I'm still free
    You can't take the sky from me

    Take me out
    To the black tell 'em I ain't coming back
    Burn the land
    And boil the sea
    You can't take the sky from me

    Have no place
    I can be
    Since I found Serenity
    But you can't take the sky from me

    This is one of the catchiest show songs I have heard in a long time. I remember thinking it was kind of a weird song for a space show the first episode of Firefly I ever saw. Pretty soon I found myself singing along.

    I can't wait to see the movie!!!

  5. Re:Ron Glass by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, to bad the show got canned before they could get around to what his deal was. "How's a preacher know so much 'bout crime?"

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  6. Re:Gimme a break... by afriedel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think you have it all wrong. This was simply one of the best shows on TV period. Not simply best Sci-fi show, best show overall.

    I made several other people fans of the show by just letting borrow my DVDs. These are female, non-geeks who hate anything sci-fi who simply love the show and were shocked that it had been cancelled.

    I don't know if you actually watched the show but it was the western motiff was just a small part of the show and only played a part in some of the episodes.

    The dialog cheesy and cookie cutter characters? Come on!! The dialog is great and very original. The characters were also unique. We had a legal prostitute, former military soldier (low rank, not a general of anything) turned business man, gorgeous amazonian warrior, not entirely loyal hired muscle, former minister looking for his way, very feminine female mechanic, dorky, talented pilot who landed the amazon and a weakly, gifted
    doctor who risked everything to save his sister.

    I don't know about you, but that is an extremely original group of characters thrown together in a very plausible way. I have never watched Cowboy beebop so I can't comment on that. What I can do is comment on is the quality of this show.

    I never post on /. but I had to on this. Go see this movie. You won't be sorry.

    --
    Aaron Friedel
  7. Re:no time travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This is certainly not an attack on time travel as a plot device. Every creative act needs a contrivance, whether it is space travel, time travel, minimally employed young adults living in $5,000 apartments, or teenagers having unsafe sex on demand with no fatal or long term consequences.

    To me the issue is when a writer stacks contrivances to force a story, rather than just letting the characters or action develop naturally, and, as result, have excess plot devices present in the story.

    Certainly many good time travel stories exist, and the ones you name are good examples. I will part with you and say that The City on the Edge of Forever was a good story. And, if there is some self depreciation, as in Sheep in the Big City, the excess and literal plot devices can become an asset. But really that is a clever exception and not a rule.

  8. I just went by the set of Serenity by duffhuff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was at Universal Studios Hollywood on Tuesday. During the studio tour (where you drive around on the busses) we went through a "quiet zone" where they were filming several movies. Right beside the Jurassic Park ride was the set of Serenity, and who was right outside the set? None other then Nathan Fillion, the Captain himself.

    Although I don't subscribe to the obsessive-fan mantra, being a huge fan of Firefly and seeing him, dressed in his usual captain garb, was the highlight of the day for me.

    I really hope the new movie does well, but either way, we've kept flying.

  9. Re:no time travel by Noren · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hmm... I can certainly understand not liking the concept of time travel in science fiction, or of not liking specific episodes. But... in B5 there were only three episodes out of the 110 which contained any (out of sequence) time travel- "Babylon Squared" and "War Without End" parts 1 and 2. The three basically comprise one story (even though two years separated their production) and the net result was interesting in my opinion. Though not a totally novel outcome, it was at least mostly self-consistent and I hadn't seen it on the small screen before... unlike the average Star Trek "We must not alter the past and/or we must fix how someone else altered the past" or "Visit to Earth in some time period for which we already have sets" plot. More episodes were produced before the first time travel episode (19) than were ever produced for Firefly.

    There were a number of anachronistic things (e.g. "Comes the Inquisitor", "A Late Delivery from Avalon", Garibaldi's Daffy Duck poster and motorcycle) which were not results of nonsequential time travel, as well as some episodes which took place over odd timelines (the "camera" going years after the rest of the series) but which had no time travel per se ("The Deconstruction of Falling Stars", "Sleeping in Light")

    There was precognition at many points, though, and lots and lots of foreshadowing and glimpses into the future. What time travel there was also implied some amount of predestination. Was it the predestination more than just the time travel which you found objectionable?

  10. Re:Ron Glass by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, to bad the show got canned before they could get around to what his deal was. "How's a preacher know so much 'bout crime?

    "That's no preacher." I figure he must be an exile from Blue Sun who sided with the browncoats, but for some reason is still considered untouchable.

  11. Re:Of course by Cecil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've gotta say, I've listened to all the actor's commentary on the Firefly DVD series, and I'll be damned if that's not Alan Tudyk ("Wash").

    "Space-torture-plex-thingy"? "If Nathan Fillion was any more charming he could turn a straight man gay. I'm just sayin' is all."?

    Who else could it be?

  12. Re:no time travel by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, City on the Edge of Forever was cool. I took the original poster to be complaining about the new Enterprise stuff, not the classics

  13. Theory on "Companions" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The "Companion" thing is a little bit strange. I think the idea is that it is a cultural thing that has spread from Chinese, or possibly Japanese, culture, but it still doesn't quite make sense.

    In traditional Japan, Geishas (who should not be confused with prostitutes) were and are revered members of society. They basically act as hostesses, and their special talent was conversing with men in a culture where men's and women's lives did not intersect and where men and women did not talk together. They are also entertainers, performing traditional music and dance. The word means something like "artist." And yes, some of them do/did have "special" men friends, but the relationship is earned by the man, not bought. If you want to read an explanation of this that has not been sensationalized into soft porn, I recommend Geisha by anthropologist Liza Dalby.

    In China, also, there were courtesans of varying status. Some were little better than prostitutes, but others-- the especially lovely and talented-- were of very high social status indeed. It is important to understand that the culture was not like our puritanical one. A girl would be chosen for a life as a courtesan when she was very young and would spend years training for her job. Becoming a courtesan was not something they had a choice about, and so being a courtesan was not associated with immorality as it would be in our culture. A really high-class courtesan would be supremely well educated, and again, a major part of her job was to be a hostess and an excellent conversationalist.

    This idea is not limited to Asia. In ancient Greece (a culture in which men would seal the door of the house with sealing wax so as to be certain that their wife did not go out and talk to anyone while they were gone), married women were basically owned by their husbands and were not allowed to learn to read or write. One of those ancient Greek guys, I can't remember who, made a remark that homosexual love was normal because how could you have anything in common with the incredibly uneducated women of their culture-- he found all women unlovable because of their lack of sophistication. (To avoid overgeneralization, remember that the Spartan women were better treated and had higher status.) However, there were "Hetaera," who again were educated courtesans who enjoyed social freedoms denied to most women. Like Geishas, they were hostesses, and would wind up as the mistresses of powerful men who spent no small effort winning their affection.

    However, even though courtesans with high social status like the "Companions" in Firefly have existed in history, they tend to exist in cultures where there is a big gap between male and female society and very well-defined gender roles. But the world of Firefly is very egalitarian, it doesn't make sense. I thought perhaps only the border worlds were egalitarian, but that society in the Core planets tended to keep its women in harem-like seclusion. But once we see episodes involving Core planets, that theory is blown out of the water. The only thing that I can think of is that perhaps in the world of Firefly, the art of "companionship" has developed to the point that people seek out those who are really good at it just as we seek out people who play musical instruments or sing really well so we can see them perform. Could "companions" be superstars of a kind of performance art? It's the only thing that makes sense to me.

    Sorry for long post.

  14. Re:Ron Glass by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "That's no preacher." I figure he must be an exile from Blue Sun who sided with the browncoats, but for some reason is still considered untouchable.

    "I don't give a damn if you're innocent or not! So where does that put you? Hmmm?"

    I don't think he sided with the loosers, I think he was a high ranking official who suddenly realised that the ends did not justify the horrible means he was using. He's obviously trying to atone for his sins.
    Though I think we'll curse his sudden but inevitable betrayal when he realises that the Alliance needs River (possibly to defeat the Reavers).

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...