Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Angered Over Ghost Recon 2

Fennario writes "According to Stars and Stripes Pacific's translation of a North Korean government newspaper article, UbiSoft's forthcoming Ghost Recon 2 videogame, which envisions a near-future North Korea/China conflict with US involvement, has already attracted the reclusive country's attention. In a curt review, a North Korean government-run newspaper called the game proof of U.S. warmongering. 'Through propaganda, entertainment and movies,' read a recent online commentary in the Tongil Newspaper. Americans 'have shown everyone their hatred for us. This may be just a game to them now, but a war will not be a game for them later. In war, they will only face miserable defeat and gruesome deaths.' Given the steep learning curve of previous incarnations of Ghost Recon, it's conceivable many may face miserable defeat and gruesome deaths anyhow."

6 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Quite a few wars without video games by Weh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of the wars in this list of 20th century wars don't have any videogames. Maybe I should send the link to some game-makers.

    1. Re:Quite a few wars without video games by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Informative
      --

      I write in my journal
  2. Re:North Korean paper doesn't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    UbiSoft is also not an American company.... UbiSoft is French.

  3. Re:Full Throttle, Day of the Tentacle.. by Alkaiser · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dude...only the PURPLE tentacles are evil. Green Tentacle is a friend of Mankind.

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  4. Re:Game not at all realistic. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Informative

    You do realise that NK can pretty much destroy central Seoul (pop ~10,000,000) in the first 24 hours of their artillery bombardments

    You'd be surprised just what kind of developments we've made in the past few years in counterbattery technology. Using tools like the AN/TPQ-47, our forces can detect incoming artillery shells, pinpoint the point of origin of those shells, and have a firing solution to destroy the artillery emplacement that fired them, all before the initial incoming shell hits its target.

    Against a modern counterbattery force, a fixed artillery piece would be lucky to get two rounds in the air before being destroyed. And as the Iraqis learned, the same applies to mortar teams that aren't smart enough to fire and move, fire and move.

    We have such counterbattery forces all along the DMZ. The artillery barrage by the DPRK wouldn't last anywhere near 24 hours, and the damage inflicted while significant wouldn't be anything like what you're intimating.

    And the next big thing is a weapons system that can intercept and destroy incoming artillery shells. I can't remember the name of it off the top of my head, and I think it's still in the proving-ground stages, but it's coming soon to a theater-of-war near you.

    --

    I write in my journal
  5. Re:North Korea is a Troll by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, yes, yes he is.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.