Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Launches Visual Studio Express, VS 2005 Beta

An anonymous reader writes "At the TechEd Europe keynote today, Microsoft launched Visual Studio 2005 Beta 1. With it, they also released a set of five 'Express Editions' of Visual Studio. These currently free applications offer a student and hobbyist-oriented version of Visual Studio, and are available in C#, C++, VB, Web Developer, and SQL flavors. Each download weighs in at right around 50MB and features tools, documentation, and starter kits. There's been multiple posts and more information on this announcement over at MSDN Blogs, too." Update: 06/29 13:57 GMT by S : A clarification from the Express FAQ: Although the Beta Express products are currently free to download: "We have not announced pricing and licensing and will not do so until next calendar year."

18 of 541 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Difference between this and full version by jeff67 · · Score: 5, Informative
  2. Free during beta, pricing for release TBA by damieng · · Score: 5, Informative

    Heaven forbid that somebody reads before they submit to Slashdot... from the Express Edition FAQ:

    Q: "Are the Express Edition products free?"

    A: "We have not announced pricing and licensing and will not do so until next calendar year. For the time being, we can tell you that the Express Editions will be low-cost and will continue to be easy to acquire."

    --
    [)amien
  3. For great free, open source IDEs I recommend... by Glock27 · · Score: 4, Informative
    you visit the Eclipse and NetBeans sites.

    As an added bonus, both are cross-platform. ;-)

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:For great free, open source IDEs I recommend... by pebs · · Score: 3, Informative

      you visit the Eclipse and NetBeans sites.

      I know we are all about open source here, but honestly.. this has very little to do with Microsoft launching Visual Studio Express. Maybe you should mention how you can code C# in Eclipse. And also mention sharpdevelop or monodevelop. NetBeans, isn't really useful for .Net development as far I know...

      --
      #!/
  4. Express Projects not compatible with VS2003 Projec by buro9 · · Score: 5, Informative


    Quote: "When you open a Visual Studio .NET 2003 Web project in Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition, the project is converted to the new, simpler project layout used with Visual Studio 2005. The conversion process also converts existing .aspx pages, .ascx files and other files into a new format; for example, .aspx pages are converted to use the new code-behind model. You can therefore work with existing projects using Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition, but the conversion process is one-way and you will not be able to continue work with them in Visual Studio .NET 2003. Note that the conversion process creates a backup of your project before the conversion begins."

    So here starts the next layer of conversion hell!

  5. Passport required .. by wazlaf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would have loved to at least give it a try, but it requires you to log in using Microsoft Passport! Bad idea! I think many people are not willing to sign up for Passport - even for goodies like this...

  6. Not Sure about free by Merlin42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ***FROM THE FAQ***

    # Are the Express Edition products free?

    We have not announced pricing and licensing and will not do so until next calendar year. For the time being, we can tell you that the Express Editions will be low-cost and will continue to be easy to acquire.

    # When will the Express products, and the rest of the Visual Studio 2005 product line, be officially released?

    The Visual Studio 2005 family of products will likely be released in the first half of 2005. Microsoft will continue to release Community Technology Previews (CTPs) and beta releases of the Visual Studio 2005 family of products until then.

  7. Re:That's cool by jeff67 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not free in any sense of the word.

    a. It's BETA, meaning not done and unsupported, not free
    b. "We have not announced pricing and licensing and will not do so until next calendar year. For the time being, we can tell you that the Express Editions will be low-cost and will continue to be easy to acquire."
    c. as previously stated, there is no permission for distributing apps built with it

  8. Re:Difference between this and full version by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Informative

    Each download caters to a specific language, one of the coolest features is to have comprehensive support for multiple language projects in a single workspace. Seems to be editor, debugger, GUI designer. Enough to get you started. None of the nice toys like analyser, test center, visio etc come with them. Nice to see they have included refactoring though, a huge ommission from previous versions.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  9. Re:Most important question: by Bazzargh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, it's very, very common. Think embedded systems. Think PDAs. Think mainframes.

  10. Re:"Hobbyists?" by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Informative
    You can get Borland development tools under a similar licence (i.e. free-as-in-beer for non-commercial use only).

    And Borland certainly have more interest in cross-platform development than M$.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  11. Re:Can you make a commercial product? by OptimizedPrime · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, the licensing doesn't let you make applications and the Web Dev specifically says that you can't put it into production and that a license (I am speculating that you have to pay for) will be available after Beta 2 comes out to be able to put things into production. You're not even supposed to use this version with IIS, only with the internal, local-host only webserver

  12. Try bloodshed.net - free compiler by tod_miller · · Score: 4, Informative

    They have a decent UI for the mingw C++ compiler. You can package it together with allegro and some nice game apis.

    Also try sharp-develop at www.icsharpcode.net/ , a free .net c# (I heard this being called C-Pound in the states) ide, that is fairly damn good!

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  13. Let's not forget SDK..... by orion41us · · Score: 5, Informative

    To write/compile and run any of the .NET languages you really do not need VS.net. Visual studio is nothing more then a nice (_REALY_NICE_) development environment and debugger. You can write your C#/VB.net/ASP.net code in notepad and compile with the command line. The compilers and documentation is part of the SDK that you can download from MS at no charge ;) as well as distribute your compiled code w/o any royalties (I think).... They really do not advertise this as they want every one to spend $$ on the VS.net but that is completely unnecessary.

  14. For .NET development... by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...try SharpDevelop, a .NET IDE for Windows (only) that's GPL.

  15. Re:Sweet! by MaestroSartori · · Score: 5, Informative
    I didn't want to mod you down for this, so thought I'd post separately:
    DevStudio is intractably bound to developing apps that run with MS technology.

    Wrong. I'm currently (as in I've alt-tabbed over from it to post this) using it to develop for PS2, using the SN Systems gcc-based toolchain and makefiles. It is trivial to use plug-in compilers, debuggers etc. with VS6 and VS.Net. May not be trivial to write them or interface them, but I didn't get the impression that that was what you meant...
  16. Also see Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 by Foresto · · Score: 3, Informative

    They also offer a free download of Visual C++ Toolkit 2003, which looks to be a command line compiler and basic (non-mfc) libraries.

  17. Re:Can you make a commercial product? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Express versions appear to be .NET pimping tools with anything that anyone else would need stripped out.