Slashdot Mirror


Spider-Man 2 Reviewed [updated]

Update: 06/30 15:42 GMT by T : This article has been pulled; the Spider-Man 2 review which appeared here was reposted without credit or permission from chud. (Read it in its original context.) We welcome original feature-length articles, but not plagiarism.

4 of 443 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The best, most informative post yet! by l810c · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also, the TomatoMeter is currently at 96 compared 89 for #1. This is always a very good indicator for me. I'm sure this movie will be great.

  2. plagarism from CHUD? by doublephaeton · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.chud.com/reviews/spid2.php3

    seems to me bonch just copy/pasted this article in its entirety, without giving any credit to the chud guys, who did the real work!

  3. Re:time.. by Bushcat · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bonch, dude, you just spent 3 hours writing a review of a 2 hour film....

    Or he spent 2 minutes cutting and pasting Devin Faraci's review over at CHUD.

  4. Re:Spiderman Review? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bonch, aka Overly Critical Guy, who keeps proclaiming he hates the bias of Slashdot and all the people the comment here, has submitted a review here. Talk about interesting personality conflict.

    I didn't know trolls submitted articles these days.


    Trolls submit articles.

    But trolls don't write articles.

    THIS REVIEW IS PLAIGARISM, PURE AND SIMPLE

    bonch (38532) did write this review.

    Unless bonch's name is really Devin Faraci, "bonch's" review is cut-and-pasted from chud.com.