Linux vs. Windows: What's The Difference?
underpar writes "This zdnet article covering Microsoft's Tech Ed conference quotes one of the speakers, Mark Russinovich, as saying that Linux is becoming more and more like Windows. He cites many examples of where Linux 'copies' Windows and other operating systems. He says the only current difference is 'how windowing is handled.'"
And it's gotten even worse with Mac OS 10.4 because now:
Linux copies Windows which copies Mac which copies Linux
(I'm sure SCO Unix gets copied in there somewhere too)
Uh oh... doesn't that sort of relationship end the universe in some sort of giant BLIP!?
Now, for those who want to actually read something that matters, Ars Technica has a primer on PCI-Express. Impress your friends, neighbors, and countrymen!
Casual Games/Downloads
Great-- this is going to attract the anti-linux trolls AND the anti-microsoft trolls, each arguing over whom you're talking about.
I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. -Henry David Thoreau
He's kinda right. I work with OpenOffice and Firefox for my basic stuff, and each time I launch those two or am in the middle of something, I have to look at the task bars to remind myself where I am at. User interfaces are so much alike.
The usual routine is pressing Win+E to launch Windows Explorer, then observe no Windows Explorer window launching, then cuss silently for the bug, then realize it's Red Hat 9 I am in.
A Unix-like OS is easily identified by the backspace key not working.
Sincerely,
Darl.
Somebody needs to write an OS where the windowing operations are all done in the memory allocator. Wouldn't that be the more efficient way to go about it?
--Slashdot: News for Turds. Stuff that Splatters.
He says in the article: "Both kernels are monolithic". I thought the Windows kernel was monopolithic.
(fingers in ears)
"la la la la la I can't hear yooooooou la la la la la la"
Well, I think putting "Windows" and "Linux" in the same headline on /. is a little like sounding the Horn of Gondor...
Yeah, home users spend most of their time simulating circuits and writing VHDL.
Jesus saves and takes half damage.
And, best of all, you get malware, spyware, viruses, and trojans for free with your installs!
Everything you listed is just a download away. I fail to see the problem.
Hell, with Windows some programs even download themselves! Now that's service!
Linux still needs a blue screen of death....
But what about the Total Cost of Ownership?
----
Software Ideas
god@world:~$ diff linux windows
;)
linux works.
windows costs money.
god@world:~$
-------------
over & out
I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
But what about the Total Cost of Ownership?
Dude, no-one owns Windows. Once installed, Windows owns you.
Exactly. A big advantage of Windows is that anyone (even your grandmother) can be a sysadmin. A big disadvantage of Windows is that anyone (even your grandmother) thinks they can be a sysadmin.
http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com