Slashdot Mirror


EFF Begins Digital Television Liberation Project

Dozix007 writes "One year from today, on July 1, 2005, an FCC regulation known as the Broadcast Flag will lock up your digital television signals. But EFF's "DTV Liberation Project" aims to help the public keep over-the-air programming free. The Broadcast Flag, which places copy controls on DTV signals, attempts to stop people from making digitally-perfect copies of television shows and redistributing them. It also stops people from making perfectly legitimate personal copies of broadcasts. More disturbing, the Broadcast Flag will outlaw the import and manufacture of a whole host of personal video recorders (PVRs), TiVo-like devices that send DTV signals into a computer for backup, editing and playback. After the Broadcast Flag regulations go into effect, all PVR technologies must be Flag-compliant and 'robust' against user modification -- and that means, once again, that the entertainment industry is trying to tell you what you can do with your own machines."

9 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Our right to fair use has ended... by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our right to fair use has ended. The conglomorates have convinced the dumbasses in the world that they have no right to fair use and the dumbasses are starting to believe them.

    It would seem that the lawmakers are dumbasses too but unfortunately for us they are getting paid to make desicions that benefit the conglomorates.

    Do NOT support law makers that support these corporations and do NOT support companies that sell devices with the broadcast flag. While we will likely NOT win please do you best to educate the rest of the dumbasses to their rights that they are slowly losing.

  2. Is piracy really that much of a problem? by foidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems to me that they are spending more money developing all these technologies than they stand to gain by knocking out piracy. I mean, you average Joe probably isn't going to go to the internet to look for his favorite show that just came out on DVD. Most times I won't either, if it's worth watching, it's worth supporting, esp. if they throw in lots of extras like commentaries and whatnot. Are they worried that people will pirate sportscasts? What is the fun of watching a game that has already been played? Chances are the people trading these would not be buying a copy anyway, so I think they are managing to piss off consumers and lose money simulatneously.

    1. Re:Is piracy really that much of a problem? by bmw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seems to me that they are spending more money developing all these technologies than they stand to gain by knocking out piracy.

      That's because it isn't about stopping piracy at all... It's about control.

    2. Re:Is piracy really that much of a problem? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's gone further...

      last thursday I went to watch the Detroit Tigers play a glood game. the gatekeeper checking my ticket started harassing me about my fancy digital camera... "That doesnt record video does it?" "recording video is stealing"

      These SOB's have everyone including the average joe that works the ticket booth at a ballpark that recording is stealing and is as bad or worse than trying to smuggle in a machine gun or bomb.

      it will not change until you have a major and almost violent public backlash. having a riot at a ballpark over a stupid policy and having the place burned to the ground or severly damaged MIGHT get the message through to the morons in the executive suite...

      but it will not happen, the people that live in this country like to walk in line and say BAAAAAH.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Is piracy really that much of a problem? by karmatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You look like a troll, but I am a troll, so who am I to complain?

      I have no problem with copyright holders defending their rights however they want, provided they don't have a government granted privelege that makes their rights take precedence over those of the people.

      I wouldn't seek to take away their right to innovate if they would quit trying to take away mine. Don't stop the copyright holders, but don't stop the Digital cable manufacturers either.

      If the market is unwilling to support restrictive copyright measures without a government mandate, the business model should be allowed fail on it's own. If the market will support works so restricted, the government intervention should be unnecessary.

      Give me my fair use rights back, I won't bother breaking your protection. Failed business models don't deserve government protection.

  3. Re:I still don't really see what hte big deal is.. by bmw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not so much telling you what you can do with your machine as telling you what you can do with their content.

    Yes but once you buy that content it becomes YOUR content (not in the IP sense) and you should be free to do with it as you wish (for personal use of course). We actually have laws in place to ensure that we have the right to make personal copies and this would eliminate that right.

  4. Renting vs. Buying Media and Software by EvanKai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We long ago moved from the model of buying media with a recording on it under the assumption we owned both the object and the right to do anything we wanted with the recording that the law allowed. Now we only buy an option to listen to a song, watch a movie, play a game, or even use an application at the copyright owner's discression. Consumers of entertainment own less with every new format.

  5. Re:I still don't really see what hte big deal is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He doesn't mean just the broadcast-flag.

    Think for a while of what the only perfect copy protection ever is. It's to prevent anyone from recording music, be it their own, or someone else's.

    You can always copy by recording, even without the analog hole or whatever you want to call it.

    By preventing anyone from recording music/whatever without a certain entity's permission, you're not only preventing piracy, you're also preventing anyone else from creating and publishing music except for the few who have the legal right to record.

    This would mean that, besides playing gigs, getting signed would be the only way for a band to spread their music around, because obviously the record companies would be the only "trustworthy" enough entity (for the government) to hold the rights to recording.

    No i don't like that idea for a future either.

  6. Re:EFF lies about the Broadcast Flag by cos(0) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The EFF is not lying, but the sentence is ambiguous.

    Flagged content must be output only to "protected outputs" or in degraded form: through analog outputs or digital outputs with visual resolution of 720x480 pixels or less--less than 1/4 of HDTV's capability.

    The two bolded portions are mutually exclusive.