Slashdot Mirror


Halloween Solar Storm Nearing Heliopause

PipianJ writes "Various sources are reporting that NASA has been tracking the Halloween solar storms of last year as they head towards the end of the solar system and the beginning of interstellar space, the heliopause, in the near future. In related news, scientists now believe that it was solar storms that ripped water from Mars, causing it to be the dry barren wasteland it is today."

18 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. How Exactly by GiveMeLinux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    (for the astronomers in the crowd) ...would the solar storms "rip" all the water from the planet, and then where would it all go?

    1. Re:How Exactly by akincisor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mars has very little atmosphere, and almost no protection from radiation. This renders the surface open to bombardment, and thanks to low gravity and low magnetism, the atmosphere leaks away into space. The article states that the water that might have been on mars 'boiled off' due to solar radiation.

    2. Re:How Exactly by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Informative

      The theory is fairly simple. You have a planet with little or no magnetic field to deflect the solar wind. Add to that a relatively weak gravatational field to keep the gasses stuck to the planet and you have this situation..

      Water vapor ends up in the upper atmosphere. High speed solar wind strikes the atmosphere and carries it away. This results in lower atmospheric pressure leading to an increased amount of liquid water turing to vapor and being carried away as well.

      As far as where it would go, its generally carried "out" in the direction of the solar wind.

      --
      Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    3. Re:How Exactly by Detritus · · Score: 5, Informative

      My astronomy professor believed that the basic problem was the low mass of Mars. This resulted in a high surface/volume ratio compared to the Earth, causing Mars to cool off more quickly and the interior of the planet solidified, shutting off its magnetic field. Combined with a lower escape velocity, this allowed most of the atmosphere to leak out into space and be stripped away by the solar wind.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:How Exactly by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

      (for the astronomers in the crowd) ...would the solar storms "rip" all the water from the planet, and then where would it all go?

      "Solar storms". That's what they want you to believe.

      But the Fremen know it was the giant Sandworms.

    5. Re:How Exactly by ars · · Score: 5, Informative

      The volume of a sphere is: 4/3 Pi r^3
      The surface area of a sphere is: 4 Pi r^2

      So the volume of a sphere goes up as it's radius (width) to the power of 3, but the area only goes up with the power of 2. So the volume increases much much faster then the area does.

      Ex:

      ^1 | ^2 | ^3
      5 | 25 | 125
      10 2 times as much | 100 4 times as much | 1000 8 times as much
      15 3 times as much | 225 9 times as much | 3375 27 times as much

      As you can see from my little chart, to the power of 3 grows way way faster then ^2 does. Power of two grew from 4 times as much as the first entry to 9 times as much, but power of 3 grew from 8 to 27 times as much as the first entry.

      --
      -Ariel
    6. Re:How Exactly by iwadasn · · Score: 4, Informative


      There's more too it than that...

      The primary difference is in the masses. The Earth is much more massive, so it has more gravity. That allows it to keep more gasses in its atmosphere. O2 for instance would easily get escape velocity on mars and leak out. So mars's atmosphere leaked out due to low gravity, this is the first step in the problem.

      Secondly, the earth (by virtue of being heavier) has a lower surface area to volume ratio. So it loses heat slower with time. That is why our core is still molten. Mars probably had a molten core at one time, but it cooled off, and that was the end.

      In addition, because the earth was heavier it got more heat from collisions (due to greater gravity) to begin with. So we not only keep heat more efficiently, we also started with more heat per unit of volume.

      Also, much of the earth's heat is believed to be produced by the decay of radioactive elements, once again the lower surface are to volume (mass actually) ratio helps to keep that heat in, which keeps our core molten.

      The liquid core that the earth still has (Venus has one too) produces the magnetic field. Our gravity is greater so most of the atmosphere can't escape, and thus we're relatively radiation hardened. In addition, the oxygen in the atmosphere (formed by primitive life) efficiently captures hydrogen (to form water) and thus keeps the hydrogen from leaking out. The solar winds deliver additional hydrogen (nicely funnelled into the poles) that replaces anything that was lost.

      There really is a lot to it, but the basic factors are...

      1) The earth is larger, so the core is still hot and we keep our atmosphere. Hot core generates magnetic shielding.

      2) The earth has lots of oxygen (due to life), which traps hydrogen and keeps the surface cool because it is not a greenhouse gas. Oxygen also produces ozone that adds extra shielding. Mars is too light to keep oxygen even if we did generate it to begin with.

  2. Re:maybe... by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article states that we have a Magnetosphere, Mars doesn't.

    That is our protection. Over 3.5 million years, without that protection, it's POSSIBLE that the water was blown off of Mars.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  3. Wrong link in article by lingqi · · Score: 5, Informative

    go here for cool animations.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  4. Re:maybe... by DShard · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oddly enough a recent nova discussed this as a sidenote about magnetic pole reversals of the earth. The discussed that eventually the earths magnetic field would disappear as a result of the process, which would last 300 years. During this we would have a constant, global aurora.

    They discussed to a good length that the failure of magnetosphere of mars had stripped it of its atmosphere and water.

    Since I got rid of cable I have honestly rediscovered why Public broadcasting is great, as I would have never found this degree of depth on discovery channel.

  5. Solar Storms Destroyed Mars? by Illbay · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Scientists now believe that it was solar storms that ripped water from Mars, causing it to be the dry barren wasteland it is today."

    Nah. It was socialism.

    Before the socialist revolution there, it was a verdant paradise, and the playground of the solar system's wealthy.

    Now, it's Cuba without the palm trees.

    The Martians are hoping and praying that the NASA landers are harbingers of the new "Yanqui" economy.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  6. Soo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..if the solar storms blew away water from mars upper atmosphere during a long period of time, which led to the drying of mars oceans, the same (but maybe in a lesser extent) should have happend to earth.

    Because of earths higher gravity, denser atmosphere and our magnetic field this effect might not at all have been that big, but over the billions of years it has probably made a noticeable decrease in earths oceans too?

    If we take a look at Venus, a planet we believe had as much water as earth in the past, we find that it has no water either - and no magnetic field but it has about the same gravity as earth and a denser atmosphere => it is quite likely that a magnetic field is much more important for a planet to keep its water, than its atmosphere and/or gravity.

    However, as I understand, during the period (several hundreds of years or more?) which the earths magnetic field changes polarity, which happends regularly, we have no magnetic "shield" and together with my statement that denser atmosphere and higher gravity than mars does not matter that much, earth should during this time also have lost some water in the same way as Mars/Venus?

    So what am I shooting at here? Well I think it is an interesting question wether we (planet earth) had more water 5 billion years ago, or if it is largely unchanged? Maybe earth was totally covered in water? Maybe we will only have half as much, or no, water in 5 billion years? Or is earth in fact increasing its water-mass by sucking up comets? Are there any such data/measurements?

    Maybe if we have such measurements from periods during which we had no magnetic field - we might be able to calculate the effects of solarwinds and thereby maybe evaluate this new Mars-theory plus maybe calculate wether earth might suffer the same destiny as Venus and Mars.

    (I think it is quite sad that we are surrounded by all these planets that once was easily terraformable but now they are all "dead". ..and we are next) :(

  7. Not Solar Storms At All by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    They think it was solar storms. I think it was patents. The Martians kept granting more and more ridiculous software patents until someone was allowed to patent water. And that person then collected it all up and that was the end of Mars as they knew it.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  8. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson got it an bit wrong by Graff · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Remember the Green / Blue Mars novels by Kim Stanley Robinson where they create an atmosphere on Mars? Well it looks like it wouldn't be viable without also finding a way to generate an Earth-like magnetic field.

    Not necessarily true. Yes, eventually Mars will lose most of its terraformed atmosphere and it will return to the state that it is currently in but that could take millions of years. We can certainly generate a ton more atmosphere than Mars loses and we can do so for a good, long time.

    Not only that but if we were really innovative we would redirect a few comets or similar objects into a close orbit around Mars, releasing them onto the planet in a planned manner and further bulking up the atmosphere. This may be a bit beyond our current technology but we should be able to do it fairly soon.

    By the time we are ready to terraform Mars we will almost definitely be able to do so.
  9. mars solar storm movie by infonick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Were you disappointed by the movie not working? Two errors were in the link.

    This is the working link,

    And here's a link to the movie itself.

    --

    You are confusing me with someone who cares.
  10. Re:Kim Stanley Robinson got it an bit wrong by Surazal · · Score: 4, Informative

    Erm, Venus has no magneto sphere either, you know.

    Serves me for not looking up the specific facts.

    Link for explaining Venus's lack of a magnetosphere (it's pretty self-explanatory):
    http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/p ersonnel/russell/pap ers/venus_mag/

    The supposition by this article claims that Earth kept its magnetic bubble due to "stirring" of the core (most likely due to tidal forces from not having a tidal-locked rotation period, I would guess).

    So, increasing the rotation would be just the key I would think to introducing a magetic field. Of course, someone here also said that a small planet colliding with that planet would be the trick to increasing its rotation. Since the entire planet would be converted to magma as a result of that collision, I think that would be the perfect solution to creating a good magnetoshpere (thanks to the trusty dynamo effect).

    --
    --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
  11. Re:Voyager?! by QuantumJedi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes we are still receiving stuff from the voyager craft I remember reading a paper about it rcently in Nature. A link to the abstract is here It may not be as pretty as the pictures we got from the outer planets but I find it amazing that such old technology can still help us do science despite the fact that it is so far away it warps your mind trying to think about it. I wonder how long the voyager craft will stay operational or what kind of computer hardware/software it used. I guess a google search could tell me but I don't have time for that now.

  12. Re:Voyager?! by niktemadur · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hell, yeah! I believe that Voyager is doing its' most important work RIGHT NOW. After the Neptune flyby, the planetary science teams packed up and left, and a new crew of solar and interstellar scientists took over the lab, to remain there until Voyager's batteries run out, in the year 2020.

    As we speak, Voyager 1 is more than twice the distance from the Sun to Neptune, maybe even three times as much. Voyager 2 is lagging behind a bit. Whatever the exact distance, the Voyager Twins are alive, well, and broadcasting from the very edge of the Solar System.

    First, a bit of definition: a Solar or Interstellar Wind is not really wind, but particles travelling through space at great speeds. Our own Solar Winds zoom away from the Sun at about a million mph; it is poetically referred to as a Supersonic wind.

    Solar winds race outward like an expanding bubble. Interstellar winds bombard us from all directions. There is a high-turbulence zone where these winds clash head-on; very little penetrates either in or out. This zone is called the Heliopause, where Solar Winds slow down from Supersonic to a hundred thousand mph. During a Solar Maximum, when our winds push the hardest, the Heliopause expands in area. Conversely, during a Solar Minimum, the Heliopause deflates.

    On August 1, 2002, Voyager 1 measured Solar Winds at a hundred thousand mph! However, eight months later, the winds went back up to Supersonic, and have remained that way. Voyager 2, lagging behind, has detected no change at any point in time.

    What does this mean? Well, Voyager 1 left the direct influence of the Sun, then some months later the bubble expanded, and Voyager 1 is back under the influence.

    This has been a source of controversy, since way too few interstellar particles were detected, according to what current theorists expected. But then again, we ARE in uncharted territory, aren't we?

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty