Solaris' Dtrace in Detail
paulkoan writes "The Register has a further details about the new Dtrace systems utility bundled with Solaris 10, along with pictures of the authors, and user testimonials. It also highlights Suns vague assurances that this (if it lives up to the hype) amazing utility may or may not end up in the public domain."
It looks like it's an allround system monitoring and administration tool. But how is it different/better than a well-sorted collection of individual tools, each doing one job as good as possible?
This article seems like it was written by Sun. I bet it's one of them junket articles, Sun must be a major sponsor of theregister.co.uk or something...
The article says what this D-Trace does, but yet, doesn't... Not to mention it's neither objective, review like, and even fails to mention alternatives or relative tools
Definately one of the poorest software article's I've seen in a while
Slashdot is making me bitter (-;
Complete CCTV Security Cameras
Gamblers Forum
No, linux does not already do this.
Solaris users could not care less whether Sun ports it to linux or not.
Sun are *not* evil because they don't immediately give away the source to a product which has taken them years and $$$s to develop and which gives them an edge in a competetive market.
Some people just prefer Solaris. If you prefer linux, that's fine.
There's an old saying, "you are what you hold yourself accountable to".
In that sense, Sun is no Microsoft. They are a hardware company that provides services, plain and simple. The only reason why they are cold to Linux is because it pits Sun servers directly against x86 commodity PC's - otherwise they are all for it.
Once the dust settles on their bread and butter revenue stream, you can better believe that they will be open-source all the way. But right now they need to force some differentation with their hardware because in most cases they simply can't compete against an x86 farm in the server space. All the rest of the BS about new accomplishment is just propaganda, I would ignore it.
Ya, sysadmins are always trying to optimize code in the core applications they bought from vendors. NOT.
It's not useless, but the examples cited were from application developers optimizing their code.
are you kidding? DTrace lets you do this not just per process, but per instruction, across CPUs. Comparing DTrace to perfmon is like comparing a Ferrari to a tricycle.
I was reading the examples of using DTrace to spot performance issues.
It seems to be that most of them could have been caught with code reviews.
Perhaps with tools like DTrace, you can spot performance issues more quickly. But I believe a good code inspection regime could catch these problems and more.