Slashdot Mirror


ARM: The Non-Evil Monopolist

yootje writes "ZDNet is running an article about ARM, a chip-maker who controls more than 80% of the cell phone market and 40% of the digital camera market. ARM shipped 780,000,000 processors last year. ZDNet finds it strange that no one seems to have anything against this company. And maybe it is strange: according to the article many would say ARM is a monopolist, but you never hear anyone say 'ARM sucks!'. But then again, why would they?"

38 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey, I have loads of Gmail invites left and no-one to give them to. Reply to this post with your email address if you want one.

    1. Re:gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      i'll take one

      rjharris292821@yahoo.com

      thanks a lot!

    2. Re:gmail invites by Fritzed · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hey if your serious I'd love one, I've been on the waiting list forever.

      Thanks,
      -> Fritz AT dreamhaven DOT org

      note to mods who don't know what they're doing.
      this is offtopic

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
    3. Re:gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    4. Re:gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      president@whitehouse.gov

      I really apprecialize it,

      G.W.

    5. Re:gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      lol

  2. Re:When did success become by AvinashM · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I won't mind having 1 GMail invite. My email address is avinash AT noulakaz DOT net

    Thanks.

  3. Re:When did success become by thesp · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Ooh..gmail? Forgive use of a mailexpire account, some people here may not be trustworthy... glolmaskal AT toungucyol.mailexpire.OBFUSCATED .com

  4. Re:When did success become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    maxious [at}} lambdacomplex d0t org

  5. Re:When did success become by NimNar · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    thanks, i really want a gmail account. jonathan_beck at yahoo.com

  6. Re:When did success become by Joe+Tie. · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I have 8 gmail invites to give away (I can't get rid of them fast enough lol), so if you want one please post your obfuscated email addresses below (logged in members only, preference given to subscribers).

    Any chance I could get in on that? joetierney a7t myrealbox.com

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  7. Re:When did success become by thug220 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You can send one my way, please.... yakadoo2 at hotmail dot com.

  8. Re:When did success become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
  9. Re:When did success become by karstux · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Oooh, gmail. Wouldn't mind one of those! :-) If you'd be so kind, mail to: blackhole AT apoapsis DOT net. Thanks!

    --
    Don't whistle while you're pissing.
  10. Re:When did success become by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Come on, that's just not cricket. Will somebody with mod points mod this down before the spambots get to it?

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

  11. Re:When did success become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
  12. Re:When did success become by Space+cowboy · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I wouldn't mind one of those :-)

    simon&@&hostip,info

    Cheers,
    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  13. Re:When did success become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The last time I heard of someone making a dummy email account, putting it in their sig, and counting spam, the amount came down to nothing.

  14. Re:When did success become by df3rry · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hmmm could u spare one for me? dferry AT OBFUSCATED EMAIL ctv DOT es

  15. Re:When did success become by binkzz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could I request one at all?

    m.goulding
    at
    staff.covcollege.ac.uk

    --
    'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
  16. Re:When did success become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    We all know that you posted that AC comment.

    'King of Prussia' is a known troll.

  17. Why was this modded down? by mark99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can't slashdot readers take critisim and self-reflection? He is only stating facts.

    It is easier to critise than to construct, and many in this forum are guilty of that.

    PS, You can send me one of those gmail thingees if you have any left (mark99 aaattt gmx dot net)

  18. Re:When did success become by passionplay · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please send me one invite. passionplay at hotmail dot com

  19. GTAPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Gay Tigger Association of Pooh-Land

  20. Re:When did success become by rpbailey1642 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd like a gmail invite, please. robert UNDERSCORE pratt AT hotpop DOT com.

  21. Re:When did success become by AndyChrist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It becomes something to hold against someone when they start using that success to prevent others from succeeding. (As opposed to using the skills and effort that led to their original success to prevent others from succeeding.)

  22. I can't believe so many fell for this fraudster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    PS, I have 8 gmail invites to give away (I can't get rid of them fast enough lol), so if you want one please post your obfuscated email addresses below (logged in members only, preference given to subscribers).

    Congratulations. That was a nice piece of social engineering.

    So what are you going to do with your list of slashdot subscribers' e-mail addresses? I bet many spammers will be interested in such a profiled list...

    1. Re:I can't believe so many fell for this fraudster by thesp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, if others had set up (as I did) an address purely for testing this hypothesis, they would have been in the same infinite return-per-unit-risk bucket I was. Mailexpire, which I use, is very handy for all this sort of thing (obtaining the GBP10 coupon if you subscribe to a newsletter, etc, etc).

  23. Re:[OT] your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.

    I don't understand what's all the fuss about.

    That's why we get taxed so that the people who're less well-off have access to fundamental services such as health-care, education and welfare if they hit hard times.

    Being poor, stupid, incompetent or having many kids is not a crime. It doesn't make your life any less worthy than that of a CEO or a university professor.

    It's barbaric to whine about your taxes when there are people around who don't have food, shelter or even access to the most rudimentary health care. Shame on you!

  24. Re:When did success become by philoxigen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Looks like I'm to late 4 this , but try anyway!! pglennon at mailcity dot com. Thanx P

  25. California electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    the only place where "deregulation" = MORE government control (and the usual feigned-SHOCK! when there's fraud on the scale of Enron, etc.).

    Look, the media are being TOTALLY DISHONEST when they call California's recent political-criminality "deregulation," CATO and various other thinktanks have proved it without serious intellectual rebuttal from the left, yet the biased news media (and therefore YOU, sorry to rant but it's true!) call it "deregulation." Jimmy Carter deregulated airlines (now we can fly cheap!) and deregulated home-beer brewing (now we can brew good beer at home!) but what Grey Davis did is NOT deregulation, it's CRIME!

    Deregulation means free markets -- something California hasn't been accused-of under Grey Davis, who fucked it up enough that Ahnold sounds smart.
    me

  26. Why do you do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I don't understand.

    Please help me to understand why you're willingly giving away your e-mail address to a complete stranger who's obviously making an offer that's too good to be true?

    He's just harvesting a list of Slashdot readers' e-mail addresses and you just gave him yours, you silly git.

    1. Re:Why do you do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It's not too good to be true. I know people who would have several gmail invites, and had to give them out on IRC. Also, there was a website (I'm too lazy to google for it...) to which people could donate their gmail invites, and they would be handed out by lottery.

    2. Re:Why do you do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      What I can't even understand is why people seem to desperate to get a GMail account. What the fuck? It's a free email address, big fucking whoop! Do these people think the chicks will dig them if they have an email address ending in @gmail.com? Even though GMail will be generally available to everyone in a few months anyway? What sort of retard gets excited by a webmail system anyway? What sort of extra special retard wants to store a Gb of email on a webmail system anyway?

  27. Re:[OT] your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    No, you are fundamentally wrong in your assumption. Taxes are not meant to re-distribute wealth; they are for essential services such as defense of the country and major infrastructure.

    Barring mental or physical problems, your lot in life is because of the choices you've made. That's not my fault and you don't have the right to the fruits of my labor to pay for your mistakes. I don't mind helping anybody out enough to get them on their feet again, but I didn't take you to raise and support the rest of your life.

    You sound quite socialist to me. Don't you know that socialism has failed every single time it's been tried? It takes away a person's ambition to better himself.

    Hillary is a socialist; she's a liar, and even her feet don't match.

  28. 2nd November by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Kerry & Edwards are going down in FLAMES this November 2nd. Bush-Cheney win in a LANDSLIDE victory. The slimy liberals finally committed political suicide. Many liberals are so far left of the far left that not even the most vitriolic and blatantly Anti-American TRAITORS like "Michael Moore" can make Hanoi John Kerry look conservative by comparison.

    Do the right thing. Register and VOTE Republican Nov. 2nd.

    Made in America,
    Daniel Joseph Min

  29. Re:[OT] your sig by jsebrech · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    No, you are fundamentally wrong in your assumption. Taxes are not meant to re-distribute wealth; they are for essential services such as defense of the country and major infrastructure.

    And you are fundamentally wrong in your assumption that your view of what taxes are is the only one, or even the biggest one.

    The view of people who support taxes as wealth redistribution mechanisms, is that everybody should get an equal or adequate opportunity in life. If you screw it up, fine, your fault, but if you are born in a poor family and you can't afford the education which would get you a decent job, the transportation which would get you to that job, or the outfit which would keep you that job, that's not your fault, and it's the government's job to rectify that situation.

    Your view that poverty is a moral failing shows that you have never known real poverty.

    You sound quite socialist to me. Don't you know that socialism has failed every single time it's been tried? It takes away a person's ambition to better himself.

    Modern socialism is not incompatible with capitalism. It is simply the effort to give everyone an adequate opportunity in life. The old socialism was a mechanism to achieve communism, and you are right in claiming that communism has always failed. You don't seem to understand what modern socialists want. They think the market is generally a good thing, but that it inherently funnels money to those who already have it, decreasing the quality of life of those who don't, and so there must be some sort of compensating system to make sure everyone gets a fighting chance at living a good life.

  30. Re:Because it was part invented by a lady by blue_adept · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't like the idea of referring to men as "she", any more that I like the idea of referring to apples as oranges or to morons as geniuses (or vice versa). If you have the Y chromosome, you are a HE... no amount of makeup, lipstick, or surgery will change that, imo. Parent was modded as a troll due to PC.

    --

    "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"