Slashdot Mirror


Who Really is the "Director" of Dashboard?

MacManX writes "Does the director of Apple's upcoming Mac OS X feature, Dashboard, have something to hide? Or does he wish to remain hidden? Or are we just reading into this way too much? Rick has an excellent observation over at MacMerc. The evidence will astound you."

35 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. Another Meaning by Angry+Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    An 'Alan Smithee' directed film also refers to a film that turned out so bad the director demanded the removal of his name (instead of having it taken away from him, as the IMDB quote in the article states).

    Example: the theatrical "Dune" movie was originally a David Lynch film, but subsequent prints bear the Smithee label.

    Fun fact: "Alan Smithee" is an anagram of 'i.e., the alias man.'

    Implication in context: rather than implying that Dashboard is so bad Apple took the project from its director, perhaps it means the project director doesn't want his name associated with it. Go Woz!

    --
    -- Apparently, some people are calling me 'Maurice' merely because I said something about the pompitus of love.
    1. Re:Another Meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean "the alias men" not man.

    2. Re:Another Meaning by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fun fact: "Alan Smithee" is an anagram of 'i.e., the alias man.'

      alan smithee --- the alias man.

      It's hard to disagree that the i's there are the same, but you left off the initial 'i.e.' Which doesn't really change anything except the particular letter which doesn't match up. Try counting the e's in your version:

      alan smithee --- the alias man.

      Someone break out the -1 Dumb mod, please.

      Indeed.

    3. Re:Another Meaning by FFFish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Much to my amusement, there's an "Alan Smithee Restaurant" in one of Edmonton's cineplexs... a diner so bad, the chef demanded the removal of his name!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  2. The article is spot-on.. by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the original cut the lead widget and widgetess were supposed to spend their lives apart, in exile, each dying thinking the other betrayed them, not realizing they really disowned the other to save the other's life.

    But the studio made them change it so they lived together in a cottage in exile after the King's wife told him she'd leave him childless if he sent them apart forever.

    Stupid Hollywood.

    (sheesh, the Alan Smithee conspiracy seems a bit far-fetched--if the guy in charge of the project didn't like what he was doing enough to go pseudonymous in a keynote, he has to be either really, really stupid, or hoping to be fired (or Steved, by some peoples' lexicon). My guess is that it's just Apple's new version of "John/Jane Doe").

  3. This proves nothing by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What did the article prove? Nothing. This is in my opinion a waste of space on the Slashdot's first page. Mod me down if you want, but the fact that Apple employees put in a fake name in a demonstration movie is no 'conspiracy'. Have you considered that maybe they just don't want people to peek at real people's profiles/names?

    A nice little thing to notice, but using it as proof for the one who designed Dashboard? That's stretching it...

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    1. Re:This proves nothing by Jord · · Score: 3, Informative
      This isn't on /.'s first page. Might want to check your preferences. It is in the Apple section where all of the stories about Apple go.

      Perhaps you want to go into the BSD section next and complain about one of the stores in there?

    2. Re:This proves nothing by sakusha · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're on to something here. Apple has a new rule against easter eggs or other hidden credits containing programmers names. The rationale is that Apple doesn't want to publicly release the names of specific programmers that worked on any specific project, it makes it easier for headhunters to poach critical personnel.

      So don't get your panties in a bunch over the smithee pseudonym. Obviously someone got bored creating demo data with the same old names like John Doe and decided to have a little fun.

  4. Is there a new Alan Smithee? by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that everyone knows, it doesn't really make sense for companies to allow Alan Smithee to be associated with their productions. So what's the new alias? I'm guessing that if there is one, it's David E. Kelly.

    Alan Smithee is one of those little pieces of knowledge that people know because it helps make them feel elite, which is weird because everyone knows about it by now. It's like the way mullets were a big joke a while back.

    But really, odds are, if you know about it, then it's not hip and you're cool, stop pretending and go listen to some more Weezer.

    1. Re:Is there a new Alan Smithee? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, according to Alan Smithee's bio:
      The DGA decided that the name got so much exposure from the film Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn, An (1997) that it was no longer an effective alias; the film Supernova (2000/I) was the first "post-Smithee" film.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  5. riiiight... by admiralfrijole · · Score: 5, Insightful
    just because they used a fake name in there instead of using steve's name in there, there's a deeper meaning behind it.

    people just seem to want to always find hidden meanings that, most times, aren't there at all.

    --
    e to the pi i plus one equals zero
    1. Re:riiiight... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It could always be one of those things known as a 'joke', too.

      After all, the calculator in the video demonstration has '1.337' on it!

      If there's one nerd in-joke, there's probably more...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:riiiight... by TravisWatkins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh, it goes deeper. The descryption key for the previews on the iTMS is a l33t version of 'try-before-you-buy'.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
  6. Dashboard Information by SandSpider · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sadly, this article: not so funny. However, since we're talking about Dashboard, I recommend going to Surfin' Safari, the weblog of Dave Hyatt, lead programmer of Safari. Since WWDC, he's been talking about Dashboard, what it really is, and the development path they're taking.

    Dashboard is actually going to be a WebKit application, with some HTML Extensions to let you do things like put a transparent mask over the window and call local code. He's discussing putting the HTML extensions into their own default namespace right now, as well as submitting them for standards approval (well, some of them). It's a very interesting weblog, and certainly worth having on the RSS feed if you're at all interested in the development of Safari and webkit.

    =Brian

    --
    There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    1. Re:Dashboard Information by PierceLabs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm more concerned with whether or not this will be as easily exploitable as Active Desktop which is its closes kin - not Konfabulator.

    2. Re:Dashboard Information by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're confused:
      New Plugin Archtecture --> New way of interfacing and running Flash etc.

      ActiveDesktop or HTAs --> Local HTML pages can call Local Code, proprietary tags for enhanced functionality.

      AFAICT, "Dashboard" seems to be just another take on Windows HTAs from 1997. (Although, the orange calculator was a sexier demo than most of Microsoft's stuff.)

      The problem with IE's implementation is that the browser is easly confused between local and remote pages (using iframe tricks, etc). It will be interesting to see how Apple avoids this.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    3. Re:Dashboard Information by SandSpider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nah, I understand the difference. The reason I bring it up is because it was mentioned explicitly with regards to concerns similar to yours on Surfin' Safari. The point being that the native code is contained in the plugins, rather than just being located arbitrarily on your computer or the internet.

      I also suspect that the plugins for Dashboard items will be bundled all together, much as Applications are in OS X, so that other webkit applications can't access random Dashboard plugins. But that's just a guess.

      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    4. Re:Dashboard Information by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Informative

      The native code in HTAs is also located in "plugins" (COM objects), which are "arbitrarily on your computer". The question is what the security model is going to look like and will it work better than IE's.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    5. Re:Dashboard Information by Chucker23N · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dashboard gadgets are indeed bundles with HTML, images, JavaScript, etc. and a plist in them.

  7. Other Allan Smithee Work by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny
    Includes The O.J. Simpson Story (1995).
    So maybe there is something going on here.
    Apple is innocent...
    O.J. is innocent...

    :Puts on his flame suit: it's only a joke. i swear!

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Other Allan Smithee Work by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check out his OJ Simpson page. It's at http:backslash-backslash-backslash- backslash-backslash-backslash-backslash- backslash-ESCAPE

  8. Worried About Competitor Braindrain? by xanderwilson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't Apple along with a bunch of other software corporations stop putting credits in their software a few years ago, to help prevent large competitors in or around Redmond from paying whatever it took to make ridiculously generous offers for those employees to work for them? Wouldn't it be prudent (if that is their policy) to avoid trumpeting all those people's names as well? What if this person didn't turn in the NDA yet?

    Alex.

    1. Re:Worried About Competitor Braindrain? by sg3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Didn't Apple along with a bunch of other software
      > corporations stop putting credits in their software a few years
      > ago, to help prevent large competitors in or around Redmond
      > from paying whatever it took to make ridiculously generous
      > offers for those employees to work for them?

      I've heard this, too, but I think this might be related to two other facts. First, it's impossible for everyone who is involved in delivering software to have their names included these days. Second, Jobs has mandated that there would be no more developer-endorsed "personalization" to Macintosh applications in order to improve software quality. Most specfically, this seems to be the prohibition of easter eggs (where most developers put their names). In fact, I haven't seen an old-style easter egg in Mac OS X at all.

      Since then, the quality of the Mac OS has increased significantly from the bad old days of Mac OS 7.5.5, where the little flag easter egg was the only good thing it had going for it.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    2. Re:Worried About Competitor Braindrain? by stere0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does /Applications/Mail.app/Contents/Resources/senders. tiff (remove the space) count as an easter egg? If you open it in Preview you can see eight pictures of Mail.app developers..

      --
      Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  9. Re:sweet app by scottblascocomposer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Don't worry, you'll be just as poor after graduation... or worse! Unless you're one of those foresightful individuals who major in business or accounting or something. Bastards.

    (Liberal arts my ass. Two degrees in music and I work in a frickin' bookstore. But I'm not bitter!)

    :P

    --
    To reign is to serve.
  10. Re:sweet app by mjpaci · · Score: 4, Interesting

    College isn't votech. You don't go to college to learn a specific trade or subject. You go to learn how to THINK. Once you know how to think, you apply that to any field.

    The subject you major in is just the vehicle you use to learn how to think. I majored in Chemistry and now, 10 years later, I manage a technology group at a financial services company. I have yet to set foot in a lab for work since I left college.

    I find the kids these days that major in business (MIS, whatever) don't really know a whole lot outside of their discipline. Liberal Arts gives you exposure to different fields. If you use your college experience properly and learn how to THINK, then you can use your off-major classes as practive for the real world.

    In the past few years I have interviewed ~30 students from the MIS program at Northeastern for internship positions in my company. i have found that most of them have no idea what MIS is and are a bit suprised when they realize they will be working the help desk or desktop support as one of their first jobs out of college.

    --mike

  11. Re:OK this is ridiculous by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Informative

    But one keen observation: I'm a movie geek, so I searched for Alan Smithee on IMDB and I get that name for directors of some of the greatest movies ever made, several are on the IMDB's top 250 list. 12 Angry Men, the Original Manchurian Candidate, Cool Hand Luke, the first Superman, etc. Interesting stuff.


    No.
    Sidney Lumet is credited as "Sidney Lumet" for 12 Angry Men (1957). He is credited as "Alan Smithee" for Q&A (1990).

    John Frankenheimer is credited as "John Frankenheimer" for The Manchurian Candidate (1957). He is credited as "Alan Smithee" for Riviera (1987)

    Stuart Rosenberg is credited as "Stuart Rosenberg" for Cool Hand Luke (1967). He is credited as "Alan Smithee" for Let's Get Harry (1986).

    Jackie Cooper is credited as "Jackie Cooper" for playing the role of "Perry White" in Superman (1978). He is also credited as "Jackie Cooper" for playing the role of "Alan Smithee" in Moonlight (1982).

  12. Somebody call and ask. by Fritzed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you look in the last couple of frames as the things fly toward the screen. You can see Alan Smithee's phone #, how about somebody calls him and asks him what's up. It is also the number in this article about opendoc, but that was in 1996 so maybe it got reassigned.

    ALAN SMITHEE
    408-796-1010

    -> Fritz

    --
    Spooooon!!!!!
    1. Re:Somebody call and ask. by Chucker23N · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's also listed on "Steve's Resume": http://homepage.mac.com/steve/Resume.html

    2. Re:Somebody call and ask. by dubstop · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Apple Computer Inc. 1976-1986 ...

      Learned many things, including do's and don'ts for building executive teams ...


      Best. Resume. Ever.

  13. Re:OK this is ridiculous by overunderunderdone · · Score: 4, Informative

    so I searched for Alan Smithee on IMDB and I get that name for directors of some of the greatest movies ever made, several are on the IMDB's top 250 list.

    No, the IMDB page is saying those directors, with their most famous movies in parenthesis so you'll know who they are, are sometimes AKA "Alan Smithee". So for instance John Frankenheimer directed "12 Angry Men" and was credited as such. He ALSO directed a 1987 TV movie "Riviera" under the name Alan Smithee - meaning that "Riviera" sucked, he hated it and didn't want his name associated with it.

  14. Good lord by Jahf · · Score: 3, Funny

    This Smithee guy must be a genius ... IMDB states he directed his first movie the year he was born and has been writing, directing, producing, composing, designing and editing many dozens if not hundreds of shows since. Now he's a keynote-quality software designer.

    Good show old chap!

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  15. i noticed that as well... by admactanium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i work in the entertainment industry so it stuck out as odd to me. but don't we all think steve jobs, who also happens to be the ceo of a major movie production studio, would know the significance of that phrase BEFORE he demo'd dashboard? most people in the entertainment field know what that means. i seriously doubt he would be caught unawares.

  16. Re:sweet app by scottblascocomposer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I suppose I should clarify that I don't actually think ill of a liberal arts education, or indeed of my music degrees. It's just a sardonic joke I have with my wife: how much easier would things be right now if we had taken career paths with more immediate tangible rewards?

    I don't expect music (or writing, foreign languages, film studies, etc...) to make me rich, but I do expect to find the life we lead more rewarding long-term in intangibles like contentment, creativity, personal pride in accomplishments, contribution to culture and such.

    Not to say I wouldn't mind a few tangibles as well! :)

    --
    To reign is to serve.
  17. I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you... by Angostura · · Score: 2, Funny

    That this posted by someone masquerading under the pseudonym 'Pudge'. Clearly he is deeply deeply embarrassed by this post. ... or somehing.