Microsoft Employee Allegedly Hacked AltaVista
An anonymous reader writes "Seattle PI has a story about Microsoft employee who worked on the MSN Search initiative having allegedly broken into AltaVista computers and stolen prorietary technology. However, the illegal break-in happened before he was hired by Microsoft. The question is, did Microsoft know anything about it? How much code was being written into MSN Search?"
Microsoft acknowledged yesterday that Chavet is a Microsoft employee but declined to name the team on which he works.
Too Obvious
However, three other people with knowledge of Chavet's Microsoft employment confirmed that he has been working on the MSN Search effort
Too unconfirmed
But, if the guy is such an expert inthe search field, isn't it posible that source code was his? How would that impact everything from a legal point?
I always make sure that I have copies of the source code of applications I have worked on so in case something happens with my employer I WON'T have to use nefarious means to retrieve what is mine.
I know many might say that employers own the intellectual property that you generate while working for them, but I don't agree. If I develop something innovative whiile working there, it's mine. If I come up with a solution for a problem am I supposted to forget the solution and never use it again if I go elsewhere?
Let them sue me. Hard to get water from a stone.
Karma means nothing to me, so suck it...
A certain site I help run has shown what many other people are seeing: MSN's search robot is absolutely going crazy lately. It purposely retrieves files of all kinds - it's done about 4.5GB of traffic on my site because it's downloading large videos! What's a search engine going to do with all these videos?
Besides that, it visits the forums as often as many of the regulars do. It's FAR more aggressive than googlebot.
It's rather obvious that MSN's new search engine is going to be both more complete and more up-to-date than anything else that's out there. I love google right now, but I wonder how they're going to stand up to MS.
--
Ikaruga scoreboard (supports netranking)
Microsoft is already appealing a $0.5 million fine for pircay of other people's code in France.
To cut a long story short, IIRC, MS bought a company X. Company X had a license to USE some code from Company Z. MS effectively began to assume they owned it, so Company Z had to court to stop MS pirating their software.
Now if Linux really had some code in it that was unknowingly copied in by someone, is this how you would want it and its creators treated, because of the acts of one morally deprived individual?? No, most would say it wasnt their fault.
Id have to side with Microsoft on this one, They obviously knew he had Altavista knowldege but i wouldnt hold their feet to the fire because i dont think they knew the extent of what this mans "experience" was.
Microsoft is in a real tough spot with keeping their secrets secret while ensuring that Altavista is treated fairly. People who steal software source code suck.
I was crazy back when being crazy really meant something. (Charles Manson)
Shame on the AltaVista legal and personnel departments for not making their employees sign non-compete clauses to prevent employees from working on the exact same type of technology for competitors.
Whats kind of freaky is that guy's website still exists... Its as if its frozen in time. http://www.subterrane.com/~dfeussner/