iTMS Sells 100,000,000th Song
Macslacker writes "At 10:26 PM PDT on Sunday, July 11, Apple apparently sold its 100 millionth song at the iTunes Music Store. While the contest may now be over, congrats to Apple for a job well done."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Most of all, I would like to congratulate Apple on their fantastic use of the DMCA to crush free software developer writing applications (PlayFair) that can handle the formats in which they sell music. We like to commend such positive use of the DMCA here on Slashdot, so that perhaps more companies will start using the DMCA and attacking small developers!
It is very important that companies like Apple help show the world that is completely possible to shove DRM down consumers throwts, and that we will smile, swallow, and ask for more. And then compliment them on a job well done sticking it to us! Perhaps if we do this loudly enough, more and more companies will realize that closed, proprietary, DRMed systems is the way they should be heading, and give them the knowledge and comfort of knowing that we will support them when they attempt to send anybody who reverse engineer these systems to jail!
Thank you Apple, thank you Jobs, and thank you iTMS for a job well done teaching us to be a soulless, consume-on-command suckers that we are supposed to be. You are helping us realize that how stupid all this talk of a Free Internet intended for open communication between people rather than a closed delivery mechanism for big media really is. The congratulations know no end!
Your taste in music sucks, with your 10,000 iTunes (TM) tracks try some Bach.
moderators, please read the first post.
it says "Kazaa serves its 100-billionth song"...i'll translate that for you: it means that he already gave nods to p2p for shear bulk.
so the parent mentioning that he still gets his music from p2p IS A GODDAMN FUCKING REDUNDANT POST.
sigh. mods. can't fucking execute them. can't shit in their mouths.
only if we didn't have fucking stupid people on this planet.
You're a cheap bastard.
--fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
You have no right to free music downloads. The people who own/create the music get to make the rules. If you don't like it I have no sympathy for you. What you THINK something should cost means nothing.
Maybe artists are getting screwed, then they shouldn't have signed on with the big labels.
.plan!! what plan?
Someone explain to me why this is something to be celebrated. iTunes downloads can only be played on software and hardware SUPPLIED BY ONE VENDOR ! Isn't this what we call a MONOPOLY ?
I'm no fan of any DRM scheme, but at least WMA downloads (ala Napster) can be played on a wide variety of software and hardware devices and it's licensable technology.
I'd love for someone to explain to me how Apple escapes the criticism that Microsoft gets for being "proprietary" and a "monopoly". Seems to me that Jobs&Co. are much more guilty of these practices.
P2P reached a new high with faster speeds, encryption better quality and a cheaper price, why...it doesn't cost anything.
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."