Slashdot Mirror


The History Of Pentium

yootje writes "ArsTechnica is running a story about the history of the Pentium processor. It starts with the original Pentium back in 1993, but it also handles the Pentium II and III. The article goes deep about how the processors are designed and work."

25 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. Does it mention... by mirko · · Score: 5, Funny

    F00FC7C8 ?
    I remember exploding many systems running many OSes with that...

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Does it mention... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Does it mention... F00FC7C8 ?

      Shall I RTFA for you to find out? ;-)

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

  2. Where did the name come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Really, who came up with the name "Pentium"?

    1. Re:Where did the name come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Five guys drinking fifths around a pentagram on the 5th floor of the pentagon on the pentecost.

    2. Re:Where did the name come from? by mirko · · Score: 4, Informative

      IIRC, another opponent(was it NexGEN ?) had issued a blah-586.
      That's why they changed its name from i586 to that less numeral one.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Where did the name come from? by Kainaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Damn. Hit a single < as you submit and you lose a whole paragrah... What I meant was:

      I always thought it was obvious.

      286... 386... 486... 586... No, Penta=5, so Pentium. Now, why didn't they call the Pentium II Sexium?

      And yes, for the mega-geeks, I do know that I'm mixing the Greek Penta prefix with the Latin Sex prefix, but Hexium just isn't as funny.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    4. Re:Where did the name come from? by robslimo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lexicon Branding came up with the name as well as "Swiffer," "PowerBook" and others.

      It's a science, you see? Or at least a niche business.

  3. Now I feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It makes me feel old that they now have a histroy for things I was around for the beginning of.

  4. other sites: by RainbowSix · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are some other cool CPU reference sites:
    www.sandpile.org
    Sandpile lists electrical specs for lots of CPUs and has links to lots of CPU documents.

    http://users.erols.com/chare/elec.htm
    Lots of info here about pinouts and electrical specs. I like this one because it lists the initial selling price for the CPUs as well.

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  5. Good link from the Inq. by plopez · · Score: 4, Informative

    Got this from the 'Link of the Day' from "The Inquirer". A good comparison of various architectures.

    http://www.microprocessor.sscc.ru/great/s5.html# AL PHA

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  6. Author has "no idea what was responsible for name" by crimson_alligator · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason Intel broke with tradition and gave this chip a non-numeric name is because numbers cannot be copyrighted/trademarked.

    Anyone could sell a "586 Chip": competitive chip makers like AMD and Doritos.

    They switched to Pentium so nobody else could use the name.

  7. Geek History by killdashnine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ahhh, ArsTechnica ... what a refreshing way to start a Monday than to relive my geek heritage. I still have my first Pentium computer in my closet at home. Large paperweight, I presume, but it may still run Linux. I've been thinking of making a wall-mounted collection of all my used processors for posterity.

    I could stand to forget about Win95 though ... (shudders). Nothing worse than having to reformat one's hard drive every 3-6 months!

  8. Re:Author has "no idea what was responsible for na by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 5, Informative

    Author also seems to believe that the P1 went up to 300Mhz, maybe with N2 cooling but I was under the impression it stopped at 233Mhz, with AMD taking SuperSocket 7 speeds to the 500Mhz mark

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  9. Dusty by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Geez, I'm starting to feel old.

    Back in 1993

    Was that sooooo long ago? I never had an original pentium, as I usually find the cost/performance not usually worth the upgrade and I therefore usually skip a processor generation or so.

    • 8086 or was it 8088
    • Mac II (i know, it's not a PC, but it kicked ass, and even though I don't have an apple now, I still believe that they are some very nice machines)
    • 486 dx-2 66 (now that was a cool sounding name)
    • Pentium II (300 mhz)
    • Pentium 4 (1.7 & 3.2 Ghz)
    Thing is, why do most of us need all of this power? The only thing that has really driven my upgrades has been the ability to play games. Excel worked fine on a PII (even usuing features most 'business' users don't like regression analysis, formulas, etc)

    Word processors worked fine as well, in fact I miss some of the older processors that didn't try to autoformat every damned thing

    Web browsers as well

    I know there are security issues with alot of older softwares, etc, but can't they produce a fast low cost computer, w/o all of the bloat. Then everyone could afford a decent computer to do 99.9% of the things they wan't to.

    My cousin just bought a $2000 computer and all he want's to do is occasionally surf, rip mp3's and DVD's - could this be done on a pentium or pentium II platform.

    Did, I go way offtopic, it's monday.

  10. Re:My First Pentium. by millwall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You lucky BASTARD, all we had was a 486SX-33.

    Anyone else but me feel old when they read a comment like this? To me 33Mhz still feels like yesterday, not like some ancient processor speed.

    I guess I'm the one getting ancient here.

  11. Pentium history minus nasty things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not a complete history as it didn't mentioned:

    - How Intel handle the Pentium bug. When the FP bug surfaced, Intel grudgingly agreed to replace Pentium chips if it affected a user significantly. My fellow grad student found out the hard way that his Pentium 90MHz he bragged about yielded wrong results in Matlab for his project. He complained to Intel and Intel wouldn't replace it since it was not important. He was a grad student in an engineering school... how was it NOT important to get accurate results? It took a long time and persistence and a threat to complain to BBB to get it replaced. I never trust Intel since.

    - Intel v. DEC. The article made it sound as all the architectural "innovations" in Pentium were the result of Intel's brilliance. What about the 10 patent infringements from Alpha that prompted DEC to sue Intel? There was a thread of this in another /. article about MS employee cracking AltaVista computers.

  12. Intel_Dominance == Smarter_Marketing by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Intel brought us ...the deliberately misleading "the P-III makes your Internet faster!!"

    God I remember the hype and FUD those B******ds stirred up with that bloddy ad campaign. I can still hear people walking up to me and asking: "Do you have a PC? What's your pentium?". Calm, calm, think happy... "Two OK!! It's two! And tell all your friends you need a pentium or your computer won't work! BEGONE EWES!!" It hurt to hear that again and again. I just gave up correcting people. They looked at me like I was crazy. Geeze listen to this guy, he dosen't know what a pentium is.

    If Intel learned anything in those last few years of the P6 core's life, it learned that clock speed sells

    It certainly does, and that's still the one thing that keeps me from buying AMD. When I configure a PC I can choose between a Pentium 2.2GHz, or an AMD 2400. Now how fast is the 2400? I don't know, It didn't say, and that's why AMD is No. 2. That and Intels hugely successful campaign of intel inside, making consumers believe that if hasn't got an intel chip, it won't work. They expect it, like they expect a monitor. Let them pay for their ignorence.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Intel_Dominance == Smarter_Marketing by Slime-dogg · · Score: 4, Informative

      No.

      The 2400 is indicative of a T-Bird Athlon running at 2.4 GHz. They came out with the XP's (mustang, palamino, etc) immediately after the Thunderbirds, which is when they ditched the MHz / GHz display.

      For all purposes, and 1.2 GHz T-Bird was capable of performing as fast as a 2.0 Ghz Pentium 4, I believe. An Athlon 2400XP will outperform a Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz, unless the programs are compiled for SSE2 usage. If there's one thing that is cool, it's the sheer bandwidth of the Pentium 4 with SSE2. That's why Intel was recommending RAMBUS earlier, because the 800Mhz RIMMs would provide the bandwidth that the Pentium 4 required.

      So, for comparison... a 2400XP will outperform a Pentium 4 2.4 in normal x86 integer and floating point math. It will not when the Pentium 4 is running SSE2 floating point math.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  13. Those were the days... by supersam · · Score: 5, Funny

    [nostalgia]
    ... when I used to lust, in equal measures, for the hottest girl in my class and the soon-to-be-launched Pentium!!
    [/nostalgia]

    *sigh*

    1. Re:Those were the days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess: you got the Pentium but not the girl ?

  14. Explosions and fire by WizzleWizzleWizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had only been in the PC-building business for a few months when the Pentiums came out. I was always really nonchalant when it came to building computers and was certainly not gentle. However, everything I had built up to that point either had the CPU soldered onto the motherboard or someone else had done it because I had never seen a separate CPU.

    When the first Pentium-based system arrived at my workstation to build I mounted the motherboard to the case and then put the CPU in place, but it didn't go in very well. I pulled it out and bent the pins back into place and put it in again. It felt like it went in okay.

    I took the little arm thing and pulled down to secure it in place and heard a sound, but I thought it was okay... I had never done this before.

    I put in the cards, drives and memory and fired the system up... blank screen and then... POP!!! and some smoke.

    I didn't realize the CPU had a dot that corresponded with a notched corner indicating how to put the thing into place. From then on I started paying attention to things like that.

    The Pentium made me mature as a technician... for about a week; then it was a contest to see how far we could launch them in the air. (kidding)

    --
    "I'm a karate man. Karate mans bleed on the inside."
  15. Very Brief History by Epistax · · Score: 4, Funny

    1978: 8086 processor is released
    1979-Present: Regret

    I think many of you will know exactly what I mean.

    1. Re:Very Brief History by Trixter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God, yes. I always wonder what would have happened if IBM went with their original idea to go with a Motorola 68000, a true 32-bit CPU with actual registers, as opposed to "Moe, Larry and Curly" (ax, bx, dx) that x86 coders have had to deal with for far too long.

  16. Quake by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The article neglects to remember the killer app for the Pentium - namely Quake 1. It was specifically optimized for the Pentium 1, and I remember it ran much much faster on a 66 MHz Pentium than on a 100 MHz 486 DX-4.

    Rich.

  17. Re:My First Pentium. by AngryTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tell my nephews that my pcs used to have a "turbo" button, and they look at me cross-eyed.