PHP 5 Released; PHP Compiler, Too

TheTomcat writes "After years of anticipation, PHP 5 was released today. This release represents a milestone in the evolution of PHP. It sports the new Zend Engine II, a completely re-worked object model, and many many new features. Check it and the changelog out." In other PHP news, remote_bob writes "There have been many attempts, like BinaryPHP and PASM, but finally there is a complete compiler for PHP. The Roadsend compiler produces standalone, native executables, and supports the entire PHP language (but not all extensions). It uses Bigloo Scheme to do its job, a variant of Lisp, the language that Paul Graham writes about. Benchmarks say that performance is pretty good. Is this another sign that dynamic languages are the future?"

Comments

PHP is moving in the right direction

[jbellis]

PHP5 looks a lot cleaner than 4, at the expense of backwards compatibility. Some will probably make a lot of noise about this latter, but it's necessary when changing (improving) the language this much.

Remember, nobody's forcing you to upgrade that site running perfectly well under php4, and you probably shouldn't.

the past is the future

[ChipMonk]

Is this another sign that dynamic languages are the future?

I'm starting to think there are no new ideas any more, just re-hashes of old ideas. Unix, almost 35 years old, looks to be once again the wave of the future. LISP is still teaching us lessons. And the command line is still the most powerful sysadmin tool we have.

Why Perl is still the Regex king

[einhverfr]

First of all having PCRE support and having regular expressions heavily integrated into the language the way Perl does are completely different things. So when I need to do log parsing, I do it in Perl, not Python, not PHP. It is simply easier and things fit more nicely for me (I use Python and PHP for at least as much development as I do Perl, but Perl still has its uses).

Second Perl has some nice features that PHP and Python lack. Of course PHP has some nice features that Perl and Python lack, and Python has some nice features that..... You get the point.

Even Javascript has some nice features if you are scripting other components (i.e. in a XUL application) but the next time I ask someone how to itterate through a hash table in Javascript, they had better not say "you don't..."

Re:Goodbye Perl?

[Christianfreak]

Compiled PHP won't be much faster IMHO. If you want something compiled why don't you write your web apps in C? One of the main points about using an interpreted language is that your app can be changed quickly on the fly which is often nessicary in web development. Doubtful that people are going to start compiling PHP apps anytime soon.

PHP for shell scripts? That's just strange. ick.

PHP 5 still lacks namespaces, that alone is a good reason not to switch. That and CPAN (and no before you mention it, PEAR doesn't come anywhere close)

Since I always get the same replies everytime one of these posts comes up I'll answer them all now.

I use PHP everyday, its part of my job (sysadmin/web-developer). Have been using it for 4 years. At first I thought it was alright, but the more I've used it the more I loathe it. I find it inconsistant and I find at its core everything that goes against what a well designed language should be.

Perl code is not ugly unless you make it ugly. You can make C or PHP ugly as well.

Perl can be used in projects with multiple developers, I work with one other developer on a regular basis, sometimes two. At the beginning of the project we plan core modules and set APIs and coding style, much like I would expect anyone would do for any language.

IMHO and experience mod_perl is faster than PHP especially in larger apps. /flame on