Slashdot Mirror


Steven Hawking Loses Bet On Black Holes?

st1d writes "Looks like Steven Hawking might have to pay up on an old bet regarding black holes - seems his idea about them destroying information wasn't quite living up to his expectations: 'The about-turn might cost Hawking, a physicist at the University of Cambridge, an encyclopaedia because of a bet he made in 1997. More importantly, it might solve one of the long-standing puzzles in modern physics.' He's due to make a formal announcement July 21."

19 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Boggle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Boggle?

    1. Re:Boggle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Would love to, which rule set?

  2. Pirst Fost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    One for my homies and a props to the guy in the wheelchair!

  3. pay with the wiki! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    FP?

  4. l0l j00 m4e3 t3h w1nd0w5 j0k3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    j00 ar3 t3h gh3y!!

  5. Hawking is now betting on new hole by slashman2004 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Steven hawking is now betting on which hole these arabs will be going in http://www.islamic.co.za

  6. I wish Martin Rees loses his bet by colonist · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I wish Martin Rees loses this $1,000 bet:

    Martin Rees predicts: "By 2020, bioterror or bioerror will lead to one million casualties in a single event."

    Biotechnology is plainly advancing rapidly, and by 2020 there will be thousands-even millions-of people with the capability to cause a catastrophic biological disaster. My concern is not only organized terrorist groups, but individual wierdos with the mindset of the people who now design computer viruses. Even if all nations impose effective regulations on potentially dangerous technologies, the cyhance of an active enforcement seems to me as small as in the case of the drug laws.
    By "bioerror", I mean something which has the same effect as a terror attack, but rises from inadvertance rather than evil intent.
  7. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    hampster instead of hamster

  8. welcome to slashdot by talaphid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here is your accordion, so goes the Far Side strip...

    but at least now you know what the PREVIEW button is for.

  9. Re:Which Bet? by cuzality · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    IIRC, the loser had to buy the winner a copy of Penthouse.

    This led me to Google "hot girls wheelchairs", which got me nothing. Apparently even teh intarweb has its limits...

  10. Re:Who is this Steven Hawking fellow? by Senjutsu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Duh. Joke. Duh.

  11. Re:Hawking for President!! by Alzheimers · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You have to admit, though, that the electronic voice box of his still speaks with more emotion then Kerry.

  12. Or... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I am being serious. Anyone who tought in college would know how frustrating it might be sometimes.

    Especially those that "taught" English in college and have access to slashdot. ;-)

    -truth

    --

    I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

  13. Re:Mod parent redundant by strictnein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you don't get karma from Funny mods

  14. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What do the choices in the moderation drop-down boxes mean?

    * Normal -- This is the default setting attached to every comment when you have moderation privileges. Normally, you should not need to actually select this option, but if your mouse slips and you accidentally moderate up or down a comment you didn't mean to, you can undo that mistake by choosing Normal before you hit the "Moderate" button.
    * Offtopic -- A comment which has nothing to do with the story it's linked to (song lyrics, obscene ascii art, comments about another topic entirely) is Offtopic.
    * Flamebait -- Flamebait refers to comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage. If someone is not-so-subtly picking a fight (racial insults are a dead giveaway), it's Flamebait.
    * Troll -- A Troll is similar to Flamebait, but slightly more refined. This is a prank comment intended to provoke indignant (or just confused) responses. A Troll might mix up vital facts or otherwise distort reality, to make other readers react with helpful "corrections." Trolling is the online equivalent of intentionally dialing wrong numbers just to waste other people's time.
    * Redundant -- Redundant posts are ones which add no new information, but instead take up space with repeating information either in the Slashdot post, the attached links, or lots of previous comments. For instance, some posters cut and paste otherwise legitimate comments in multiple places in the same discussion; the pasted versions are Redundant.
    * Insightful -- An Insightful statement makes you think, puts a new spin on a given story (or aspect of a story). An analogy you hadn't thought of, or a telling counterexample, are examples of Insightful comments.
    * Interesting -- If you believe a comment to be Interesting (and it's not mostly Redundant, Offtopic, or otherwise lame), it is.
    * Informative -- Often comments add new information to explain the circumstances hinted at by a particular story, fill in "The Other Side" of an argument, provide specifications to a product described too vaguely elsewhere, etc. Such comments are Informative.
    * Funny -- Think of Funny as being a good moderation choice if you actually think the comment is funny, not just because it seems intended to be. Not every knock-knock joke is Funny.
    * Overrated -- Sometimes you'll run into a comment which for whatever reason has been moderated out of proportion -- this probably means several moderators saw it at nearly the same time, thought it was Funny, Insightful etc, and their scores added together exaggerate its relative merit. (A knock-knock joke at +5, Funny) Such a comment is Overrated. It's not knocking the original poster to say so, but it's probably better to spend your mod points on comments which are deserving of being moderated up.
    * Underrated -- Likewise, some comments get smashed lower than they perhaps deserve by overzealous moderators. If you moderate a comment as Underrated, you're saying that it deserves to be read by more people than will see it at its current score. As with Overrated, if you can think of a more specific moderation reason, do so -- if a comment has already been moderated with an appropriate label though, and you just want to indicate that it deserves greater visibility, that's what Underrated is for. However, if a comment is labeled with a fitting (negative) label, choosing Underrated isn't such a great idea, because you could end up with contradictions like "+5, Flamebait."

  15. Re:Integrity by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dont you know - the terrorist use spam to send secret messages to each other. Thats why there are s much of it. They are using the practical theory that says that it impossible to find a needle in an haystack or in this case the message in all the spam.

    --
    Just saying it like it are.
  16. Re:Mod parent redundant by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    an AC trolled:
    C'mon people, we know this joke isn't funny; I agree, Windows sucks, but this just isn't funny: he's obviously whoring for karma.
    If you check my posting history, you'd know that half the time I post seriously, the other half for fun. I don't need to whore for karma - had tons of it for years.

    I get mod points all the time (have some now, in fact) and I usually concentrate on modding up rather than downmodding.

    /. is a social phenomenom, not just information.

  17. scarlet & grey by happyfrogcow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Earlier in 2004, Samir Mathur of Ohio State University in Columbus and his colleagues showed that if a black hole is modelled according to string theory...

    Go Buckeyes! Not just a football program! Neener neener!

  18. Re:Winning a bet... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hold on I'll ask him. He's out back mowing my lawn.

    His answer was "No hablo inglés", whatever that means.