Slashdot Mirror


Is Math A Sport?

theodp writes "The close of the International Mathematical Olympiad prompts Slate to question if math is a sport, wondering if mathletes might someday compete in the Olympics alongside track stars and basketball players."

5 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. The answer is no! by toetagger1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Math by definition is not a Sport.

    Math:
    The study of the measurement, properties, and relationships of quantities and sets, using numbers and symbols.

    Sport:
    An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively.

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  2. Lamest Slashdot article in a long time... by TitanBL · · Score: 4, Informative

    Math is interesting, math is fun, math is usefull, but math is not a sport.

    From WordNet (r) 2.0:
    sport
    n 1: an active diversion requiring physical exertion and
    competition [syn: athletics]

  3. Re:Takeshi's Castle by wwest4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many people cite it as a "non-sport," but synchronized swimming is incredibly difficult, both athletically and otherwise. Here's a way for you to find out:

    swim 60 meters underwater.
    stay underwater 3 out of 5 minutes.
    train in a pool 7 days a week in addition to a periodized weight regimen and plyometrics.

    Those things are just auxiliary. As a prerequisite, you must to have incredible overall swimming skills, cardiovascular and muscular endurance, great strength, agility, balance, discipline and superbly-honed technique.

  4. Re:No. by GodOfNothing · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a British Junior Invitational Mathematical Olympiad (Yes, really.) I must say, unequivocally, no.

  5. Re:Sure! by andi75 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I have no mod points right now, so I'll throw in my +1 modifier...The correct explanation for the above result is (from AC:):

    This isn't using divisions by zero. This particular "proof" relies on the fact that rearranging the terms of a nonabsolutely convergent series does not necessarily give the same sum. In fact, such a series can be transformed into a series with any given sum simply by rearranging the terms.