RadioAid.com vs. Clear Channel Communications, Inc

Rob Vining writes "On July 16th, 2004, a decision was handed down from the National Arbitration Forum that took away ownership of RadioAid.com's website "ClearChannelSucks.net" and gave the website to the complaintant, Clear Channel Communications, Inc. The decision of the arbitration panel has left us (the founders of RadioAid.com) with only one choice. That choice is, to file suit vs. Clear Channel communications, Inc. to retain ownership of our outlet for free speech against this corporate monopoly. Http://www.RadioAid.com/sucks.asp We're raising legal funds in our suit vs. Clear Channel and would be so appreciative to have you spread the word to your readers and create awareness of yet another attempt for a billion dollar company to silence it's critics and squash free speech on the internet. Please help us spread the word about this and any assistance you could provide in posting this to other media outlets would be extremely helpful!"

Comments

CC has no chance

[Deagol]

IIRC, 2600.com won its case concerning the verizonreallysucks.com case. Actually, Verizon realized they had no case and gave in.

The various "cybersquatting" laws could affect this lawsuit. But I think that CC would loose in a legal fight.