Slashdot Mirror


How Do You Test Your Web Pages?

Pieroxy asks: "As a web developer, both professionally and personally, I try to always make sure what I write works in every browser at my disposal. When the choice came for me to choose a platform for my PC, I went the Windows route, because I cannot afford not to test IE on all those websites/applications. But now I am facing a problem with all browsers that don't have a native Windows port, such as IE5/Mac, Safari/Konqueror. kde-cygwin helped very little because the version of Konqueror shipped doesn't display most JPEG, making any testing worthless. IE5 for Mac should die soon, but is still widely used as being the default browser for so long. How do you test your web pages? Have you noticed discrepancies on how a specific engine (Gecko, Opera, KHTML) renders content on different Platforms? Do I need a Mac and a Linux machine to make sure it is working on these platforms?"

4 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Re:code to the standard by cyber0ne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But even "standard" code can render differently in different browsers on different platforms. Depending on the complexity of the website/application, small differences can be a big problem.

    At my last job I kept a log of browsers/platforms that hit the webserver. From the vast majority (at the time, IE5 on Win9x) down through the percentages, I would run what I could for testing. For example, using whatever tool of choice (VMWare on my home network was what I used), I tested my sites in IE5 on Win9x, IE5 on Win2K, Netscape, Mozilla, etc, etc. I think I was regularly testing on maybe the top 6 percentages in the log, capturing about 99.5% of the hits.

    There will always be a percentage of browsers in the world you can't test, be they either little-used browsers on little-used platforms or widely-used browsers with some strange configuration that messes things up. But if you can identify the majority of the variations that are hitting your site(s), then just test as many of those as you can before you feel confident that it's "as compliant as it's going to get."

    --
    http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
  2. BrowserCam by bjpirt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you don't want to buy a mac, you could always use browsercam

    Of course you messed up in the first place not getting a mac. You can test in PC/IE from the mac, but not the other way around.

  3. Re:Validator by JimDabell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but that's simply not good enough. Writing valid code is only a very small part of making a robust website. You can write perfectly valid code that fails to display properly in any major browser. For example, not testing in Internet Explorer 6 will leave you prone to a couple of very nasty bugs that cause large sections of the page to simply not get shown.

  4. Re:code to the standard by Basje · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a self fulfilling statistic: people with an unsupported browser (in which the page won't render correctly or at all) won't return. Thus, the supported browsers will always be top in the logs, unsupported browsers will stay at accidental hits.

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword