Slashdot Mirror


More on the Jackito Tactile PDA

Roland Piquepaille writes "A week ago, I wrote a column about a new Tactile Digital Assistant (TDA), the Jackito. Several Slashdot readers questioned the existence of the product and thought it might be an elaborate scam. I also had serious doubts. But as both the company behind this TDA, Novinit, and myself are French, I decided to investigate and contacted the company. And I spent several hours with the CEO and the CTO. I told them about the mistakes they made in their early announcement and asked what kind of corrective actions they were taking to fix the situation and build trust in their product. I also discussed their vision of this TDA, the history of the project and its possible future. But more importantly, I used an early prototype. I don't know if this TDA will be a success, but one thing is sure: it's real. Read this interview for more details."

8 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Re:A TDA I would buy by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes but jackito is "real" unlike most of Pamela Anderson

    --
    Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  2. Re:Any other correlation? by stienman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And you, of course, are posting as an anonymous coward, giving something as fact and not giving us verification from multiple sources?

    You could be right, but at this point he's identified himself, and you're hiding. Who would you trust in this situation?

    -Adam

  3. and the story was corroborated by ... by scrytch · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...the submitter of the first story!

    Way to go Slashdot. Those night school lessons in journalism must really be paying dividends.

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  4. Re:Obligatory by eboot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Two ageing Sarin warheads? Doesnt sound like a mobile chemical weapon laboratory to me. I seem to remember that being on the news but when they realised it was two ancient sarin warheads they all shut up about it because it was more than likely an administrative error as opposed to a 'secret chemical weapons cache'

    --
    Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  5. Re:Obligatory by pocket_monkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Some of us are English and we've never liked the French, WMD's or not.

  6. Re:Obligatory by rj4x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    what is this fucking FARK now? *barf*

  7. Re:Obligatory by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm sorry but I have no plans to visit Paris in the forseeable future

    --
    Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  8. Re:Obligatory by quax · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If such an amount of chemical ammunition (BTW classified as left-over from the Iraq-Iran war back when the US supported Saddam) justifies an invasion your army will be kept very busy for the forseeable future. Best of luck with that!