Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Are You Annoying?

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the that's-a-little-personal-don't-you-think dept.

cweditor writes "This Computerworld article looks at some habits of people in general and IT pros in particular that can drive co-workers crazy."

13 of 656 comments (clear)

  1. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fp dumbasses!

  2. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    lol

  3. no by pizza_milkshake · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    N000000 0F C0UR$E N0T!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?oneoneoneoneone

  4. Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    John "Golddigger" Kerry and John "Trial Lawyer" Edwards, yeah, that's pretty fucking annoying.

    1. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      But Bush takes the cake as far as annoying goes! Not only that, but he is dumb too. It's like double annoying.

    2. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Watch Fahrenheit 9/11. He really is a dumb-dumb.

    3. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Let's see, calling Iran and North Korea the "axis of evil" thus biting off much more than we can chew, yeah that is pretty dumb.
      Or how about going after a country that didn't attack you, meanwhile letting the mastermind of the attacks get away. Once again, amazingly stupid.
      Or how about thinking that the Iraqis would welcome us with flowers. Once again, amazingly dumb
      Or how about cutting taxes and spending like there is no tomorrow on useless military toys. Amazingly dumb.
      Or how about not providing enough bullets and armor for the troops he sent into battle. Amazingly dumb.
      I could go on all day if you like.

    4. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Or how about going after a country that didn't attack you, meanwhile letting the mastermind of the attacks get away. Once again, amazingly stupid.
      Because we're not hunting bin Laden anymore? All of our troops are out of Afghanistan? Right? Oh wait... Nope, we're still there, still going after him. Ofcourse you can deny reality all you want.

      Or how about thinking that the Iraqis would welcome us with flowers. Once again, amazingly dumb
      Maybe if you read/watched some non-liberal media reports you'd see that a lot of them did.

      Or how about cutting taxes and spending like there is no tomorrow on useless military toys. Amazingly dumb.
      Not that it helps the economy or anything...

      Or how about not providing enough bullets and armor for the troops he sent into battle. Amazingly dumb.
      There was never an issue with bullets, only armor. And I'm sure it was Bush that personally sent every kevlar vest to Iraq...

      You, sir, are an idiot.

    5. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Or how about not providing enough bullets and armor for the troops he sent into battle. Amazingly dumb.

      Kinda hard to do considering that your position flopping boy Kerry (among others) voted against the funding for body armor for deployed troops.

      You should probably leave that one out of your rhetoric next time around so it doesn't blow up in your face again.

    6. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You've convinced me. I'm voting for Chimpy again! He got us in the mess, he can get us out.

    7. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by hackwrench · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Considering that the reason that Kerry voted against it was because of riders on the bill, his voting against it wasn't as bad as you think, though I don't know entirely what to make about his statement that if his was the deciding vote he would have voted for it. He says he wanted it to pass but not with the appearance of overwhelming support for the bill in the condition it was in. More Info

    8. Re:Kerry & Hutz in 2004! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You want to talk about flip flops, defend this quote from Bush during the 2000 election, "It is not America's job to go out and participate in frivilous nation building"
      *Pulls up pant legs

  5. Re:The answer is by W2k · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I am unsure as to why I posted the above as a reply to another comment, instead of as a new thread. I blame temporary(?) brain dysfunction, and apologize.

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.