Slashdot Mirror


Unix's Founding Fathers

Dave B writes "There's a nice article on Economist.com about Dennis Ritchie, the genesis of Unix, and the C programming language."

7 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Stangely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it doesn't ask what would have happened had it all been patented, back in the day. Nice bit of history, but it was a remarkably different way of operating back then.

    1. Re:Stangely by ultrabot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it doesn't ask what would have happened had it all been patented, back in the day.

      Simple - it would be dead. Just like the WWW if it were patented. Or Linux (well, not patented but placed under proprietary license).

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    2. Re:Stangely by ModernGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it would have been patented, there would be no linux, no open standards, all would be closed, compaq's would run compaq os, ibm's would run OS/2, dell would run DellOS. Noone could make software in one language and have it interoperate between operating systems like we seemlessly do today thanks to C. We would have to pay money to develop software, we would spend more time worrying about liscensing then actually programming. Computing would not be what it is today. Thank god they did not patent any of it.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    3. Re:Stangely by spektr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was proprietary software, patents wouldn't have done a thing to it.

      There's a difference between proprietary software and patented software. BSD could easily reimplement all proprietary parts of UNIX and won the lawsuit that followed. But if these parts had been patented ("e.g. a method to write an OS using a programming language"), that wouldn't be possible. I think you're either uninformed or trolling, or both.

      There was an implementation of UNIX and it was proprietary. But there were other implementations of UNIX that were free. What matters isn't some implementation, but ideas. And the idea of UNIX hasn't been developed only by AT&T, but also by the UNIX community - in a open way, since the beginning. Patent that and UNIX is dead.

  2. Re:Modules by bigberk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    *NIX is modular in that you can pass output from one command to another via pipes
    Definitely, and I think what escapes modern comp sci people is the incredible flexibility of being able to use several simple, distinct programs together to achieve a broader processing goal. Data flow between processes achieves the best separation possible, allows for the ultimate 'compatibility' (inter-process communication) and leaves performance monitoring/control to the OS. In the long term, the UNIX model sounds like a winner to me.
  3. The moral of the story is... by peterpi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Managers: If you have a couple of coders with nothing to do for a month or two, don't panic. Tell them to do what the hell they want and they'll come up with something useful.

  4. Re:The funny thing is by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was a word processor. I am certain they could find other uses for a word processor than a patent office.