Slashdot Mirror


Toyota Patents Winking, Laughing, Crying Car

theodp writes "If the patent system ain't broke, don't fix it: The NY Times/IHT reports that four inventors working for Toyota in Japan have won a patent for a car that they say can help drivers communicate better by glaring angrily at another car cutting through traffic, as well as appear to cry, laugh, wink or just look around." The article goes on to describe "...a car with an antenna that wags, an adjustable body height, headlights that vary in intensity and hood slits and ornamentation designed to look like eyebrows, eyelids and tears."

78 of 484 comments (clear)

  1. What I want to know by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 5, Funny

    is what part of the car is going to represent the middle finger

    1. Re:What I want to know by tambo · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I suspect the primary claim of this patent reads: "A method of substantially increasing the frequency of auto accidents by adding distraction to the road, comprising..."

      Seriously, what an awful idea. Yes, let's pay attention to the emotions of the cars around us. Because even after the advent of cellphones, food from drive-throughs, stereos, GPS devices, and in-car LCD screens - we're still paying WAY too much attention to our driving situation.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    2. Re:What I want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screw that.

      I want rocket launchers and flame throwers.

      Let's have some real retribution for those who piss me off, none of this namby pamby crying shit.

      And don't dare mod this comment as "funny".

    3. Re:What I want to know by shufler · · Score: 2, Funny

      The inventors say that these features on cars will make driving more entertaining.

      As long as you're being entertained watching the crying car behing you, as you rear-end the angry car in front of you, what difference does it make?!

      THEATER FOR THE ROAD.

    4. Re:What I want to know by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But let's be honest, how many people in this self-centered world really give a shit what other's around them think? I would wager about 1%.

      This is a complete waste of time. But hey, what else do they have to do? It's not like there is an energy crisis going on...

    5. Re:What I want to know by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. At least it'll mean you're paying attention to the vehicles on the road.

      Cars are already designed to try to clue you in to what the driver is thinking - for example, brake lights, turn signals, horns, etc. Communication of intent between drivers is critical while on the road. Now, some of this is more what the driver "feels" than what they are planning, but I doubt it would *hurt*. The more attention you pay to what's on the road ahead of you, the better.

      --
      SILENCE BLATHERING TOADIES! We are your new masters.
    6. Re:What I want to know by tambo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At least it'll mean you're paying attention to the vehicles on the road.



      But are you? Instead of paying attention to all of the cars, you're paying more attention to one particular car. And it's not guaranteed to be a car that's important to your driving situation - it could very well be a car on the opposite side of the road.



      One of the other posters wrote it best: as you look in your rear-view mirror at the guy behind you, whose car is making a frowny-face, you're likely to rear-end the guy ahead of you.



      Or, look at it this way: You're spending less time thinking about driving, and more time thinking about our ephemeral human interaction with the other driver.



      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    7. Re:What I want to know by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Communication on my car is best done with a bumper sticker.

      "Bite my shiny metal ass"

      I'm one of those road warriors who holds an extreme grudge against Honda teens, Lexus dinks, and every other idiot who fails to realize that:

      a. you're just a sack of meat, $$$ or not
      b. other people are sacks of meat too
      c. cars are tougher than sacks of meat

      When someone consciously pulls a stupid stunt near me, I take it as a threat to my health and well-being, and react accordingly. Getting the finger is getting off easy, in the street or a bar it would have been a severe beating.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    8. Re:What I want to know by xp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we really need is IM-enabled cars. "Hey you, yellow car, wake up, the lights green."
      ----
      How to Make Programming Fun

    9. Re:What I want to know by Coulson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We could also go a long way by expanding the capabilities of the existing communications channels.

      For instance, why not have brake lights shine brighter the harder you're braking? That would give people behind you an indication of how hard they need to brake, without waiting to judge your change in velocity.

      Or brake lights that shine forward?
      Or acceleration lights that shine green (brighter the faster you accelerate)?
      Or turn signals that tick louder the farther you've traveled with them on (to remind you to turn them off)?

      Lots of innovations in car UI just waiting to happen, but it's so fscking standardized that no one's going to make them. I'm glad to see Toyota's at least thinking about what it means to actually drive a car, rather than just trying to build the latest rendition of an old concept.

      P.S. I get really incensed by the ads that are running right now -- I forget whose -- where the company claims to have 're-invented the wheel', 'rethought the car from the ground up', and 'come up with something completely revolutionary'. Then they show you a picture and it's... a sedan. Same as every other car on the road. Whoop-de-fucking-do.

    10. Re:What I want to know by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you spend your entire time as you're walking smiling, frowning, crying, etc?

      Odds are, the answer is 'No'.

      People don't spend their time expressing emotions to strangers unless they have a reason for it, and when they do, there's generally a good reason for it, and it's generally either appreciated or causes a desired interaction. That's the nature of communication in crowds.

      This would, more than anything, encourage *good* driving. There have been many times where, when I've been in a big pack of cars and desparately needed to get over, another car went out of their way to let me over. Such behavior, in direct human interaction, generally receives a "thank you" or a smile, but there is no way to do this in your conventional car (cars can pretty much only say "Hey!" - the implied meaning of the horn). For all the person knows, their action went unappreciated.

      The "thank you" or smile aren't functionless.

      --
      SILENCE BLATHERING TOADIES! We are your new masters.
    11. Re:What I want to know by tambo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you spend your entire time as you're walking smiling, frowning, crying, etc?

      Odds are, the answer is 'No'.

      True. But that's even worse: now a car expressing emotion is an unusual occurrence, one that prompts you to pay attention to it.

      Can you think of another visual event that might encourage people to be better drivers? How about a wreck by the side of the road? A small visual indicator of the consequences of bad driving might encourage people to be more careful.

      But what is the real impact of that? It's a visual distraction - and it causes people to gawk, horrendously tying up traffic. Worse, people have follow-up accidents: they're so busy looking out the side window that they hit something. All visual distractors have the same impact - and the more interesting they are, the more adverse the result.

      Even car horns are distracting. If someone behind you honks their horn, you always shift your eyes off the road to your rear-view mirror to see what's up. Many accidents have happened in that instant. And if the car isn't honking at you, then that accident was pointless.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    12. Re:What I want to know by twofidyKidd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Cars are already designed to try to clue you in to what the driver is thinking..." Yes, well, drivers have to actually be thinking for it to be of any use.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    13. Re:What I want to know by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Communication of intent between drivers is critical..."

      Obviously you are new to driving.

      If the other driver knows my intent, then I've lost the element of surprise.

      --
      Arbitrary sig
    14. Re:What I want to know by RyatNrrd · · Score: 2, Informative
      P.S. I get really incensed by the ads that are running right now -- I forget whose -- where the company claims to have 're-invented the wheel', 'rethought the car from the ground up', and 'come up with something completely revolutionary'. Then they show you a picture and it's... a sedan. Same as every other car on the road. Whoop-de-fucking-do.

      ...And it has an internal combustion engine of traditional Victorian design, and it runs on petrol. I couldn't agree more. If they really were to 'reth[ink] the car from the ground up,' maybe they'd be able to fix a few of the major MAJOR problems with the current design.

      Nah, pay the engineers to put eyebrows on the fucking thing instead.

  2. I just want to know... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...would Herbie the Love Bug count as prior art?

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  3. Two Words: by XCorvis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two Words:

    Moon Roof

  4. Doesn't this increase the danger? by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you spend a few extra split seconds looking in the mirror at another car's "expression" then you are spending less time looking ahead of you.

    1. Re:Doesn't this increase the danger? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only if you take a picture of it with your camera phone.

    2. Re:Doesn't this increase the danger? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If you spend a few extra split seconds looking in the mirror at another car's "expression" then you are spending less time looking ahead of you."

      And looking in the rear view mirror at the driver behind you is going to take less time some how?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Doesn't this increase the danger? by LincolnQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't this increase the danger?

      Well, possibly, but if someone is trying to communicate with you, it may be the best way anyway. Think about it. Would you rather they flash the lights, honk the horn or wave? You will spend more brain cycles trying to parse these messages. Generally, an interface that uses ingrained brain 'hardware' to communicate is usually better than teaching everyone that signal X means Y.

      You may remember that we had that article on Facetop last week, where you can use your existing hand-eye coordination 'hardware' to drive the pointer. That sounds like really stellar UI. This is similar in that it would use humanlike social cues to communicate. (Then again... social cues? I must be new here.)

      The only problem I'm seeing is that the facial expressions that a car can make are probably nothing like actual social cues, and that they would not be similar enough to trigger expression recognition code in your brain. Who knows.

    4. Re:Doesn't this increase the danger? by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, I never look at other drivers. I view other cars as just that, other cars, not really acknowledging the fact that there are other humans doing the piloting. I guess driver's ed worked well for me, as I don't experience (or express) road rage.

      I'm not a robot, not yet at least ;-) but vehicles to me are entities in and of themselves. So if the vehicle itself gives me an expression, I'd give it some attention (and thus have less attention left for the rest of the driving experience), but even if a driver gives me the finger and falls halfway out of his window doing so, I wouldn't notice him -- unless his car happened to start swerving.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    5. Re:Doesn't this increase the danger? by baudilus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree, this could actually reduce the time spent looking in the mirror. If you cut someone off, the guy in the car behind you is going to do everything he can to get your attention (flip you the bird, honk, scream, shoot at you). If this car is at all successful, after the first phase of 'wow, look at that!' comments from drivers, people will get used to it and disregard angry drivers at a glance, easily guaging their emotional state from the very visible front end of the car, rather than peering at the driver him/herself.

      On a side note, I'd like to the car do this automatically, without the driver having to flip a switch or push a button, kind of like Suki's car in 2 Fast 2 Furious (albeit hers was only on the dashboard LCD, not outside the car).

    6. Re:Doesn't this increase the danger? by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One might argue, that, as humans are hardwired to quickly asses human facial expressions, we might spend less time looking in the rear-view mirror if cars had them. I think it would be at least worth a scientific study.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  5. the new kids craze by CmdrGoatse · · Score: 5, Funny

    2 tonne furbies on wheels

    --
    | ` /
    | \,X`\ HEIL HITLER
    | .
  6. How long.... by Rob+Carr · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...before the first news article "Driver of Glaring Car Shot to Death"?

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  7. emotional ricer.... by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder what expression a riced-out version will show when mom's minivan beats it in a drag race...

  8. Oh great by dacarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just what we need. All these hotrodders and riceboys that soup up their cars to bounce or sound like they go faster than they're going, and now we have the manufacturers participating in a slightly backhanded way.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  9. Fargin Iceholes! by Aerog · · Score: 2, Funny

    So does this include a speech distorter so it sounds like the car is screaming obscenities at the rest of the idiots out there?

    I'd set mine to "Bender"

    --

    - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  10. The future is here! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait... No, thats totally (for lack of better word, no offense to anyone) Gay. Very Gay. When are you going to make them fly like you promised in the 50's? Thats the future I want. I want a flying car with laser cannons! And missles that come out of the tail pipe! With a racing stripe!

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  11. Call them automoticons by khendron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like smilies for cars to me ;-)

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Call them automoticons by zantispam · · Score: 4, Funny

      re: automoticons

      Didn't the Autobots beat them up?

      --

      censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
  12. Prior art disclosure obligations and Benny by Nakito · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope the inventors complied with their duty to submit a copy of "Roger Rabbit" to the patent office. Benny the Cab anticipates every technology described in the article.

    1. Re:Prior art disclosure obligations and Benny by Diamon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, Speed Buggy predates Benny by 15 years.

  13. As if my commute couldn't get worse... by ibullard · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...now I have to deal with being surrounded by crying cars on the way to work.

    Screw that.

  14. Speed Buggy? by mdrechsler · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did anyone else think of Speed Buggy or am I the only dope that remembers that show?
    http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/ShowMainServl et/showid-5028/Speed_Buggy/

  15. Incredible! by Pendersempai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hehehehe... Japan is so funny. Anthropomorphic cars. Hehehe... Can we order them with Garfield stripes?

  16. This is gonna look hilarious by OOO0000OO0O0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know those Chevron cars? Those toy and clay model ones that they use in the commercials and you can buy at gas stations? Well, that's what I think is going to happen. I am going to be laughing my ass off and on during my entire commute if this thing was introduced heavily into the market. As such, it is important to provide safety controls for the drivers and passengers laughing their heads off and not concentrating on the road.

    I propose that along with the car that has the expressions, when they get introduced into the general car population deep enough, that each be provided with a driver laughing restraint system, such as a swift kick in the balls by actuating the gas pedal or something.

    In other news, a car gets indicted for sexual harrassment.

  17. For those who don't know... by jmkaza · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:For those who don't know... by jpetts · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real "love bug" beginning with those letters...

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  18. Patent critique? by k98sven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The patent system may be broken, but I don't really see how this would be an indication of it.

    At least to me, this is not an obvious idea.

    Unless of course, you have a Japanese sense of imagination. I'd trust the people who invented Domo-kun , Vending machines for 'used' underwear and heated, self-deodorizing toilets to come up with just about anything.

  19. Most needed expressions... by meganthom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Forget anger and letting people merge in front of you... Here's what I want my car to be able to express:

    1) Oops!
    2) New to area.
    3) I'm completely lost.
    4) Medical emergency.
    5) Learner

    How many times are we angry with people who just happen to be dealing with one of the above and who we would easily forgive if we knew as much?

    --
    Live free or die
  20. Road Rage by guitaristx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't the idea be to decrease road rage? It's a great novelty idea, but nothing more. As someone already mentioned, it distracts drivers from watching the road. That's partly the reason why there are many restrictions (at least, in the US) about blinking lights, moving parts, etc., on vehicles. Personally, I think the little spinny-things on the rims are annoying enough, and I'm not looking forward to the car giving me the same head-tilted-back, lower-lip-stuck-out, looking-out-from-under-a-goofy-looking-hat, I-wanna-be-like-the-rappers-on-TV expression as the driver.

    --
    I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
  21. So it's on the front, right? by HaloZero · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's great, really, but what I'd rather like/need is a way to communicate with those people behind me, who like to tailgate.

    Something like, 'You do not have appropriate stopping distance. Back off, or I'll test my theory by way of brakes.'

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:So it's on the front, right? by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. Do not test your theory by way of brakes. Even if they hit you, you still have to go through the hassle of exchanging information, talking with insurance, etc. That's annoying.

      Do what I do.

      Keep a realistic looking stuffed toy dog (even a cat does the trick) in your car -- it doesn't need to be big or anything -- just realistic looking. Then, when someone is tailgating you, calmly roll down your window and release Fido (make sure your hand doesn't stick out too far -- ruins the realism).

      Trust me...I almost died laughing when I tried it the first time. The guy slammed on his brakes and swerved to avoid hitting my "dog." And, well, let's just say he kept a healthy distance after that.

  22. Hmmm, Is This Good? by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This certainly sounds like it could be useful, as generally more communication is a good thing. But from my own observations, I'm not entirely sure that the other driver knowing what I'm thinking/feeling is a good thing. I've had plenty of thoughts about the asinine driving of other people that probably would have resulted in fights rather than better understanding! I, of course, drive perfectly!

  23. bAH! by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see it now... "Driver slipped off icy road when tears (from car) landed on ice"

  24. Yeah, whatever.... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    how about increasing fuel efficiency? (yes, even more.

    or making them safer (fundementally instead of bigger and heavier)

    or better communication integration for the ever-pressed-to-the-ear cell phones

    or better collision avoidance systems

    or making headlights that can be "ub3r" that don't blind everyone on the road

    Yeah, making sure the car has emotions and becomes more distracting is a stellar idea. Yesh.

    1. Re:Yeah, whatever.... by CrankyFool · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > how about increasing fuel efficiency? (yes, even more or making them safer (fundementally instead of bigger and heavier)

      These are the Japanese we're talking about here, not the American auto industry. Their cars are the most gas-efficient mass-produced cars you can get in the US. They're making some larger SUVs, but only because that's what Americans want to buy. You can still buy a high-efficiency Civic.

      >or better communication integration for the ever-pressed-to-the-ear cell phones

      Have you seen the Acura's Bluetooth integration?

      >or better collision avoidance systems

      So we can have every slashdotter bitch about how that takes away from their control and they can't trust an automated system to do their avoidance for them?

      >or making headlights that can be "ub3r" that don't blind everyone on the road

      Yeah, what's up with that? We want lights that put out tons of visible light and throw it out far, but that won't blind anyone who looks at them. Is that so hard?

  25. Closely related by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a while now I've been meaning to build an LED display for the back of my car so I can flash messages like GET OUT FROM UP MY ASS and plain old FUCK YOU! to whoever's tailgating me.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Closely related by superflippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because I'm going 80 in a 70 zone and I'm
      a) too nice of a person to let you go 110 and get a ticket.
      b) driving a car too tall to fit underneath the truck in the lane next to me.
      c) pretending I'm in NASCAR by letting you draft 3 inches from my bumper.
      d) secretly amused by your obvious frustration.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    2. Re:Closely related by Blastrogath · · Score: 2

      There are 3 or 4 roads where I live that have more than 2 lanes. Tailgating is not limited to freeways, it happens plenty on 2 lane roads. The whole right/left lane issue is a red herring.

      Tailgating doesn't take "balls", it takes stupidity and a disregard for the safety of others. If you need to prove your manhood by driving recklessly then there isn't much there to prove the existance of anyway.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  26. how does that work? by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I posed a question when I submitted this story yesterday: they claim that the horn only sends one message, and doesn't allow you to thank someone who lets you cut in. How does a smile on the front of your car tell someone behind you thanks? I always found that a simple wave accomplished this quite well, myself.

  27. Re:Automobile voice chat by Coulson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The drawback is that you'll get the internet/chat room phenomenon. Anonymous communication leads to insults ('u r g4y'), flame wars, etc. Some people would hopefully use it well, but (as with CB radio), it risks turning into a pissing contest.

    That said, when you commute you're traveling as part of a community of drivers. I think that having the ability to convey a limited set of phrases ('go ahead', 'thank you', 'sorry/my bad') would be beneficial. Pre-programmed voice macros would solve the problem: give people the ability to transmit, but enfore curteous phrasing. As soon as you open it up to allow people to say anything, it's likely to lead to more road rage.

  28. Why don't they make them really representative by Loco3KGT · · Score: 2, Funny

    And make their larger SUVs look like male genitalia?

    Or is Chevy already trying to do that with the Corvette?

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  29. That was really from the Onion, right?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  30. Toyota Pod Concept by MooBob · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is just the patent for the Toyota Pod concept, featured in one of the Gran Turismo concept games. Here's a little bit more information: http://www.supercars.net/cars/2001@$Toyota@$POD%20 Conceptb.html

  31. "Pick up" Lines by 10101001011 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait for the possible dating situations...

    Ford F-250 winks at the cute little Toyota Echo.

    "Hey good lookin', what's a car like you doin' on a highway like this?"

    Will that be premium or supreme?

    Can I change your oil?

    And my personal favorite:
    Wanna flash me?

    Thank you, I'll be here all night. Don't forget to tip your waitress and try the steak...

  32. Great... by sup191 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now my wife AND my car can look pissed at me all the time.

  33. Personal contact by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not just the anonymity that does it, it's the physical contact. If you go up to some guy in the super market and say "OH EMM GEE YOU ARE THE FUCKING GAYEST GUY ON EARTH DUBYA TEE EFF IS YOUR PROBLEM", you aren't insulated by tons of steel or miles of wire.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  34. Well this is Japan... by cryptochrome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Therefore I wouldn't expect to see the middle finger much, but I would expect to see all the standard manga/anime visual icons.
    There's a good list of them here, along with all the appropriate emoticons, although they left out a bunch of other less common stuff (bloody nose for sexual overstimulation, snot bubble for sleeping, escaping spirit for half dead, completely white from shock, puking looks kind of like a waterfall), and certain mouth patterns (aggressive fangs).

    In particular, expect to see sweat drops, popping veins, and funny eyes. ^_^;

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  35. The only thing I need to communicate to drivers... by danish · · Score: 2, Funny

    is the middle finger. As a New Jerseyian (born and raised), I have a sub-two second roll down window/extend arm/raise middle finger time. It's second nature in situations like "soccer mom in minivan on my right doesn't even look out her left window and tries to change lanes into my car." My response then was an instictive, sub-second horn/brake/swerve/flip-bird.

    This system is sufficient for any and all inter-driver communication needs I could ever imagine.

  36. Better yet... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mount it backwards in the front... "TURN YOUR GODDAMN BLINKER OFF!!!"

    lamenessfilter, dont use caps, blah blah blah

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  37. Don't laugh by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a issue of Grassroots Motorsports, where they did an autocross competition between a 1965 Porsche 356, a 1967 Jag XKE convertible, and a stock 2003 Honda Odessy minivan.

    The minivan, with stock tires, smoked the Jag, and tied the Porsche. With one level better tires, the minivan smoked the 356 as well. Smoked it badly

    1. Re:Don't laugh by hurfy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats hardly fair. How about personal planes vs personal auto? They have come pretty close to same increase. Werent many zippy 200-300 mph private planes 40 years ago. Compare commercial cars/trucks with commercial planes perhaps. Neither of which is particularly impressive performance. (yes, both made some economy gains though)

    2. Re:Don't laugh by phliar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Try doing a similar test with commercial airplanes.
      Ok, compare the DH Comet (or B-707) to the current 777. Gas turbine engines (the "jet") have been absolutely revolutionized from the 60s. Compare thrust and fuel consumption -- "orders of magnitude" would not be an exaggeration. Look at airfoil deisgn and cruising speeds -- going from Mach 0.68 or so to today's Mach 0.8. Consider design and construction techniques. No, airliners are a bad example of static technology.

      I'm hoping ... sub-orbital ...
      Unlikely. Consider this: if air travel were instantaneous -- runway to runway -- your travel time will still be many hours. Ground transport to/from airport, check-in, baggage handling, security, aircraft taxi -- a significant proportion of travel time. Travelling faster than Mach 0.8 in the atmosphere takes a huge amount of energy (civilian supersonic travel is unlikely to come back). Escaping the atmosphere will require hugely more. Add to that the cost of life support -- passengers do not want to don space suits to visit grandma, and decompression would be rather more serious than at 35,000 feet. More likely: turbine manufacturing advances? Modern gas turbine engines are ridiculously expensive. Different source of energy? It would be nice to not have to carry large quantities of explosives (chemical fuel) on passenger-carrying craft.
      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  38. Prior art by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Funny

    My old 1974 Fiat X-1/9. Bump the headlight switch just right, and the left headlight pod would go op, down, and back up again. Winking, as it were.

  39. Tailgaters by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I usually handle tailgaters by slowing down to about half the speed limit, and continuing to slow down until they either get the point and back off, or get fed up and blow past me.

    Seriously, the danger from tailgating is that they might rear-end you (duh). If you slowly reduce your speed this greatly reduces the risk of a high-speed read end collision while simultaneously giving them a great incentive to stop tailgating. They're doing it because they think it'll get them to their destination faster. I simply make it clear to them that they'll NEVER get there if they insist on tailgating me.

    In my experience, most people get the hint and back off.

  40. The adverts (or parodys) are gonna be great.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Funny

    As a car is stuck at the lights the eyes will slowly follow some girl crossing the road, and then the hood will pop open..

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  41. Excellent idea by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the 60s, linguists postulated that your vocabulary influences your character, claiming even that bilingual people act differently depending on the language they're speaking.

    That would explain why drivers start acting like enraged apes as soon as they enter their cars: They are limited to honking, blinking, acceleration and hand signals.

    Kreegah, bundolo!

  42. Re:Un-obvious???? by k98sven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean really.... because there's never been a movie/tv show ever that tried to portray a car as having emotions....

    Let's get this clear: Yes, car's have been portrayed as having emotions lots of times.

    That is not original.

    What is original is proposing this as a real technical solution to an actual problem, as opposed to simple anthropomorphy.

    Since human faces have been drawn forever, I suppose the idea of Chernoff Faces would be obvious too. It is not.

  43. YOU'RE THAT GUY!!! by choovanski · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pay attention to the chick in the silver Civic tomorrow, she always flips you off as she passes and you NEVER give her the satisfaction of looking!

  44. Yeah lets take no personal responsibility by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are quite right - the meaning of the word gay has taken on a new additional meaning in society of something stupid or contemptful.

    But if this word's new meaning stems originally from usage by homophobic males who used their negative connotations with gay people to give power to a new insult, than it is clear that using this word is an insult to gay people (regardless if it is intended to be by any particular speaker). Every time the word is used in a negative way, it reinforces the idea that there is something bad or contemptible about "gayness".

    But for you to just say "blame society" is an ignorant avoidance of the fact that each of us can and should be responsible for our own vocabularies - and be mindful of the affects of various word choices on those around us.

    People often use the word "girl" in a negative way - "don't be a girl". This is another example of word usage that creates and reinforces both a negative stereotype and negative connotations of being a certain type of person. What subtle (or not so subtle) affects does this have on girls images of themselves, and on women as they grow up?

    Our word choices can often show our deep prejudices, as well as foster these prejudices in those around us and those growing up under us.

  45. Version 0.1 by fishwallop · · Score: 2, Informative

    The strange-looking 2001 Toyota POD Concept seems to have been a first cut at the emotional car (e.g. light panels turn red to indicate frustration, blue to indicate "sadness" at being out of gas, etc.) The concept car doesn't have the "eybrows", but does have an antenna it can wag to indicate happiness.

  46. Is This a Hoax??? by severoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this a hoax???

    The patent number referred to is 6,575,593, but a quick search for that patent number at the US Patent Office yields a patent entitled: IEEE 1394 or USB powered computer light.

    Seriously, people. I think this might just be a hoax.

    sev

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:Is This a Hoax??? by m4k3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've messed up the patent number slightly. The article refers to patent # 6,757,593

  47. You're kidding... by LordEq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously. In Colorado (at least in the Denver area) *277 would get you a direct connection to the reckless driving office of the state highway patrol.

    You mean to tell me that, in Colorado, you can actually dial *ASS to report idiot drivers? That's awesome!

    When will the rest of the states get their acts together?

  48. I'm with you by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I like your ideas, have had similar ones (as I imagine many drivers have had) for decades.

    I always thought that there should be bar lights, red for breaking; blue, green, white, or whatever for acceleration. And have them keyed to a standard applicable to all makes - e.g. three lights of red would mean a certain standard amount of deceleration.

    The other thing I always wish for is that trucks and such have a screen on the back showing their view of what's in front of them. Then when you get behind an idiot who is going slow and has no one in front, you know you should/can pass. For those who think this would be dangerous for some reason, remember that most drivers do this already with cars in front, as you can see through them from back to front.

    Heh, heh. Maybe the screen could be incorporated into the Toyota idea - if you're pissed off at the person behind you, you could switch to a shot of your face and mouth "fuck off" rather than having the car mimic the emotion.

    One last thing that I always wanted were "excuse me" lights. You know, for when you're the dick who cut someone else off (for a good reason, of course!).