Slashdot Mirror


Apple Not Too Harmonious with Real

An anonymous reader writes "As if in answer to the question previously asked on Slashdot, CNN Money is reporting that Apple isn't all that happy that Real pried open the door to the iPod for its RealMedia files. "We are stunned that RealNetworks has adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod." It should be interesting to see how this pans out in court, and if the DeCSS case serves as some sort of precedent."

5 of 940 comments (clear)

  1. How will this pan out on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the constant Apple lovefests, the hatred of the DMCA and DRM, the dislike of Real Player, and the love of hacking.

    1. Re:How will this pan out on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How will this pan out on Slashdot?

      As a flaming, troll-infested mess! This is going to be like watching Jerry Springer, Slashdot style. Maybe I should get some popcorn...

  2. Important Guide to Understanding Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    UNDERSTANDING DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT:
    A SLASHDOT FLOWCHART EXCLUSIVE
    Start:
    Did a corporation use Was the encryption--Y-->Did someone reverse
    encryption to prevent-Y->in question engineer the system,
    their customers from pathetically weak? allowing for more
    fairly using purchases? | /--consumer choice?
    N-------N---<------<----N----<--+----<--- <-<No.. . |
    | \ Y
    N<------N----<---Did the corporation Did this new<--+
    | react violently, <--Y-software enable
    | Was the<--Y--slander hackers, fair use?
    | corporation and fire off legal
    | Apple(tm)(R)? threats using DMCA to suppress speech?
    | | |
    | Yes +No-->Oh my God those assholes! It's time we put this source
    |_ | code on a T-shirt! Time to contribute to the author's
    \ / legal defense fund! Time to call our senator and tell
    No big deal! him to repeal the evil, flawed DMCA! Time
    Time to play "Quake!!!" to practice "civil disobedience!". Time
    to write "distributed peer to peer"
    corporate-subversion software! Time to call for a radical reform
    of copyright laws! Time to decry Palladium(tm)(R) design and
    distribution as a grand scheme to put us under the lock and key
    of DRM! Time to raid DVD-Jon's jail cell with Dimitri as lead
    commando! Time to hack Hillary Rosen's web site and deface statues
    of Jack Valenti! Quick buy another 2600 T-Shirt!
    By the way, wouldn't it be great if Devo was 99c a song?
    God I still remember the HACKER MANIFESTO!!!!

  3. The horror! THE HORROR! by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is unspeakably wrong! A company spends MILLIONS, perhaps even BILLIONS to come up with their own proprietary mechanism for exchanging files between their OWN services, and some damned upstart comes along, reverse-engineers it, and has the AUDACITY to make their OWN service interoperate with it...WITHOUT PERMISSION?!?!?

    All of that money that the company spent, down the drain, because some "hackers" figured out how their carefully crafted system works! This is wrong and unfair!

    Our course is clear! We must NOT support the evildoers who have committed this foul act of hacking! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT!

    We must NEVER use SAMBA AGAIN!!!!!

    Wait...who were we talking about again?....

  4. Re:Not cool? No, your complaint is not cool by insomnyuk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, and while we're at it, I would like a PDA that lights my cigarettes and wipes my ass for me.

    I want it to be able to light normal filtered class A cigarettes, but also include support for 100s and unfiltered.

    I want it to support 1-ply AND 2-ply toilet paper and be forward-compatible for new multiple-ply standards in the future.

    I would also like it to be child and babysafe, so that if a toddler is within a certain proximity of the machine it will not light cigarettes and will only use baby wipes.

    Furthermore, it must be fully compatible with my OS/2 Warp box.

    And I would like a pony, but that last one is optional.

    Anyone that does not acquiesce to these demands is being closed and proprietary. For shame!

    Apple's possible legal action aside, the iPod is an example of product implementation where their goal was to do one thing and do it well: let people play tons of music on a well-designed, portable device. Google did the same thing with search by keeping it relatively simple.

    If I had a nickel for everytime I heard someone on /. bitch about the iPod not having x encoding format or x obscure-as-shit Operating System Compatibility, I would probably have about $40 U.S. Sir, the dead horse you are beating is little more than so much decomposed mush now. Let it go. Please.