Slashdot Mirror


UK Scientists Recommend Caution in Nanotechnology

PizzaFace writes "An independent study of issues posed by nanotechnology has warned that nanoparticles could pose unique risks and should be regulated by government, and generally should be considered hazardous until shown to be safe. Nanoparticles are now being used in some cosmetics, and workers in some industries face exposure on the job. As the report summary notes, 'Concerns have been expressed that the very properties of nanoscale particles being exploited in certain applications (such as high surface reactivity and the ability to cross cell membranes) might also have negative health and environmental impacts.' The year-long study was commissioned by the United Kingdom and done by a joint working group of the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering. The Washington Post reports that the U.S. government is aware of nanotechnology but is letting industry regulate itself for now."

6 of 30 comments (clear)

  1. Perhaps its just an idea of a layman but... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hasnt biology been crafting nano-stuff since.. the beginning?

    Whether it be a buckeyball or a double helix, cant the body handle it? You know.. evolve?

    --
    1. Re:Perhaps its just an idea of a layman but... by cephyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      evolution doesnt help the little guy. just your great^10 grandchildren.

      --
      Moo.
  2. Hope they've learn their lesson. by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully US companies remember asbestos and the like. And understand that they will get their asses sued into the ground if they arn't sure these product are absolutly safe.

  3. Caution by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Obviously, some caution is required. But it would also be a shame to see this technology be slowed down. What we really need is some kind of consortium that will let companies work together to come up with reasonable standards that wont hinder their work. Legislation should be avoided until it proves necessary.

  4. Re:Caution where it's necessary by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You're conflating two utterly different questions -- safety on the one hand and an issue of bioethics on the other. (And botox, which has nothing to do with either.)

    You can disagree about how tightly nanoscale particles should be regulated and you can disagree about what stem-cell research should be funded by the government (for the bazillionth time, stem-cell research is not banned, let alone "*banned*") but one has nothing to do with the other.

  5. Completely ridiculous by slubberdegullion · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is utterly ridiculous. Like horses worried about car exhaust. We ruthlessly kill bacteria and bugs and such as a matter of course because we are so much superior to them, but then nanotechnology is as superior to us as we are to bugs, and yet we protest at dying to support its first stirrings! Truly the human race is the most arrogant, if not the most intelligent, thing that will ever exist on the planet!