Slashdot Mirror


Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards

An anonymous reader dropped a note in to say that the Linux Journal Editors Choice Awards have been announced. No real surprises in the list, except maybe giving RSS the award for best game.

115 comments

  1. Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even for Windows, Firefox is awesome... I left Netscape at version 6.0 (you know, the one with a ton of AOL bloat), and now it's the first time that I feel that a browser can compete with Explorer. It's fast, customizable, cute, compatible... and the extensions thing is just a greaaaaaat idea! Tabbed browsing is also the best thing since sliced bread...

    GG for the win! :)

    I didn't checked the other awards, not being a Linux guy... (at least, not for now!)

    1. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by damu · · Score: 0, Troll

      I agree I think firefox got cheated big time. Heck it was not even mentioned!

      --


      Useless sig.
    2. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1

      Even for Windows, Firefox is awesome... I left Netscape at version 6.0 (you know, the one with a ton of AOL bloat), and now it's the first time that I feel that a browser can compete with Explorer. It's fast, customizable, cute, compatible... and the extensions thing is just a greaaaaaat idea! Tabbed browsing is also the best thing since sliced bread...

      Anyone know how progress is going on a mozilla port to AmigaOS? There's tens of thousands more potential users out there, mozilla developers, who are clamoring for tabbed browsing for amigas.

    3. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone know how progress is going on a mozilla port to AmigaOS?

      I heard they finally shipped the T-Shirt.

    4. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by valisk · · Score: 2, Informative
      Except for where it was mentioned as best "Web Browser or Client: Mozilla Firefox"?

      Please RTFA next time :P

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    5. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude there's six of us left, and Wayne & Jeff are out sick this week. That's four left.

    6. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard they finally shipped the T-Shirt.

      Bearing in mind that it's still version 0.1, so it's still feature incomplete.

      For version 0.2 the roadmap plans on adding holes for head and arms.

      KFG

    7. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by feidaykin · · Score: 1

      ha ha ha... and happy 5000th post! please keep them coming, and that means no dieing either, mister "winner" of the genetic lottery.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    8. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by severoon · · Score: 1

      I love Firefox too since I started using it a few weeks ago. Only one question, though...to be considered in competitions like this, doesn't there have to be at least a 1.0 version? I mean, one could argue the playing field isn't level if it's not at 1.0 because it's not the officially, full-featured release version yet. What if Firefox 1.0 includes a bunch of bugs or implements requirements that make it far less desirable to use?

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    9. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy 5000th post from me too. I hope to see many more. This is from the stalker without a Slashdot account.

      As luck would have it, I have am enjoying Firefox because of its many extensions. My favorite one that I find useful for reading your posts is a right click menu for looking up words extension such as:

      germane
      terminus
      subterfuge
      vehemently
      exude
      Q.E.D.: quod erat demonstrandum
      bungalow
      daft
      obverse
      innuendo
      Socratic
      a posteriori
      Dona Nobis Pacem
      anecdotal

      Yes, I have been keeping track of words that you have used which I needed a dictionary for. It probably shows my lack of reading, but that comes from spending too much time in front of a computer working with software. Also, it earns my title of stalker. :-')

    10. Re:Firefox deserved the win for best browser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. I was wondering if I was the only person celebrating his 5,000th post.

      --The other stacker

  2. Re:BSD wins top babe award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to consider voting for Ceren on the poll attached to the first post above.

  3. RSS -is- a game. by ljavelin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find that RSS is inconsistent and a constant challenge.

    Yum, how many different implementations of RSS can YOU deal with? It is, in fact, a game.

    [If you've never implemented a client, don't bother replying.]

    1. Re:RSS -is- a game. by moonbender · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even the acronym itself in "implemented" inconsistently: the article expands it to Really Simple Syndication, the (I think) original and official meaning is RDF Site Summary (where RDF := Resource Description Framework) and IBM, among others, expands it to Rich site summary. Source: Google Definitions.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:RSS -is- a game. by lphuberdeau · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, RDF is something totally different: It's a W3C standard that has a much larger vision than simply RSS. It's used for semantic web and FOAF type of projects but the applications are about unlimited with some imagination. Anyway, I found that giving an award to RSS as a game was quite a good joke. What kind of geek plays games anyway?

      --
      Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
      PHP Queb
    3. Re:RSS -is- a game. by InsaneCreator · · Score: 1

      Another weird thing about RSS is version numbering. Version 0.91 is completely different from 1.0 which is completely differnt from 2.0, but 0.91 and 2.0 look very much the same.

      As far as I could understand from the articles I needed to read so I coud create my own RSS feed, one of the standards is just plain XML (0.91, 2.0), while the other is xml-serialized RDF and they are also specified by two different groups of people.

      And the end result is a really nice mess.
      (But then, those articles could be wrong and I don't really know anything)

    4. Re:RSS -is- a game. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      RDF Site Summary only refers to RSS 1.0, not .9x or 2.0.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    5. Re:RSS -is- a game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definition of RSS?

      the Register just call it "Arse Feed" :)

  4. Re:BSD wins top babe award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks dude. I shall include a link to this poll in future Ceren posts.

  5. Re:Poll: WHICH IS BETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aw cmon, mod this up!

    Yesh! It's not every day we see a poll which doesn't include "sex with a mare".

  6. RSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Says a lot about the state of games on Linux. It'd be like IRC being named favorite word processor.

    1. Re:RSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes sense, since IRC is in fact just a multiplayer text editor.

    2. Re:RSS? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a more appropriate analogy be naming the Internet favorite word processor because it is the backbone of IRC?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  7. Freeciv? by Andreas(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RSS isn't a game. The best Linux game is Freeciv.. Period.

    1. Re:Freeciv? by XryanX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm really surprised that Unreal Tournament 2004 didn't get the vote.

    2. Re:Freeciv? by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Or Quake 1, which is free and open source for Linux... Quake 1 is also more fun than the newer slower FPS games.

    3. Re:Freeciv? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Come on now. The best game on any platform, ever, is Nethack.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Freeciv? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      C'mon - lets get more nostalgic. How bout Doomsday?

  8. Ardour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never heard of it before. Anybody want to weigh in on how it compares to Audacity whilst I download?

    1. Re:Ardour? by paulbd · · Score: 3, Informative

      sure, i'm the primary author of ardour.

      audacity is a soundfile editor, ardour is a digital audio workstation. you can do some of the same things in each - record audio, chop it up, apply FX and so forth - but they are not equivalent in a deeper sense.

      ardour is modelled on proaudio apps like protools, nuendo and samplitude. its not intended to be used for simple editing tasks, but for complex multi-track, multi-channel audio work. we hope that its UI will evolve to make the simple stuff simple, but our initial goal has been to make sure we have an internal architecture that can do anything the high-end proprietary apps can do, and more.

      if you don't know how the high-end tools work, ardour will seem very very complex (and the current lack of a manual won't help much with that). if you have used protools, ardour will seem relatively familiar to you, although we attempt to take best-of-breed features from all the other DAWs. otoh, DAWs have all pretty converged on the same core feature set, so the differences have more to do with GUI nuances than functionality.

    2. Re:Ardour? by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      I've always felt that Audacity's main problem is that its not sure if it wants to be a sample editor or a multitrack editor like Ardour. I guess it copied this schizophrenia from Cooledit...

      BTW, I see you nicked the Ardour website style from my sample editors website (marlin.sf.net). But its okay, I nicked it from somewhere else too, and after all, you changed it a lot more than I did...

  9. ClamAV by karmatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using ClamAV now for a while, and it does a good job.

    For my mail server, I use Qmail-Scanner, which does a very good job. Older versions had some issues with funky/broken MIME messages, but they seem to have been mostly resolved.

  10. One Install Away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From Article-
    "Any hardware whose speed gets compared to greased rodents is at least worthy of an honorable mention, and Greg Kroah-Hartman made that comparison in his vote for the dual-processor version of the Apple Power Mac G5, which is one Linux install away from being a great system. "It's fast, quiet and pretty to look at. With full 64-bit goodness for a very cheap price, what's not to like?" he wrote. "

    One linux install away? I realize this is the linux editors journal, but what about having OSX installed doesnt make it a gre
    at system?

    1. Re:One Install Away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because OSX is slower than linux, isn't fully 64 bit (yet), and doesn't support as many hardware devices?

  11. Great system.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Greg Kroah-Hartman made that comparison in his vote for the dual-processor version of the Apple Power Mac G5, which is one Linux install away from being a great system."

    The G5 is already a great system, out of the box.

  12. -1, Flamebait! :-) by KjetilK · · Score: 0, Troll

    Uhm, actually, this should probably be moderated flamebait, allthough the poster might not be intentionally trolling.... :-)

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:-1, Flamebait! :-) by moonbender · · Score: 1

      How is my post a flamebait? I was used to the original RDF site summary definition, and surprised to see there were others... Naming conventions nonwithstanding, I still like RSS and use it a lot now that my browser is RSS-enabled.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:-1, Flamebait! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. Your post is nothing but flamebait, and you are a troll.

    3. Re:-1, Flamebait! :-) by KjetilK · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, first of all, note the smiley! Basically, there was a big flamewar about RSS around the release of RSS 2.0. Dave Winer wanted something that was really simple, whereas a whole lot of other people wanted RSS to be the first real Semantic Web application.

      RSS as in RSS 2.0 stands for Really Simple Syndication, while when the R in RSS stands for RDF, we're talking Semantic Web.

      So, if you had mentioned the two in the wrong fora at the wrong points in time, it would invariably have set off a huge flamewar...

      What resulted from the flamewar was a fork, and Atom was created. Now, it doesn't seem to me Atom is a Semantic Web application either, and I probably lost many points here....

      There seems to be some peace possibilities though.

      Anyway, the funny thing I meant to point out was that one could inadvertly spark a flamewar by just saying the wrong things yet meaning nothing bad about it...

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    4. Re:-1, Flamebait! :-) by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Ah! I wasn't aware of those discussions, I thought "Really Simple Syndication" was something like a joke, trying to get RSS in line some of the humorous OSS acronyms.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  13. About GIMP2 by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Graphics Software: The GIMP

    Is anybody else unhappy with some of the changes in GIMP2? For me, several useful things have disappeared (like ctrl-T to hide the layer's borders, now it's something else and I have to go in the menu), of the fact that the "anti" tool key modifier is now ALT and not SHIFT anymore (apart for the magnifier, go figure...) and so it creates problems with KDE, it doesn't save the tablet's device status,... the list is endless.

    All in all, I wonder why they voted GIMP. It's become less good and less usable than GIMP1, and certainly less than Photoshop overall anyway.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:About GIMP2 by EvilIdler · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't like the shortcuts, change them!
      At least in X11, you can point your mouse at the option you
      want changed, then press the key combination you prefer.
      For example, open the menu at "Save as..", press Ctrl+A,
      and now Ctrl+A is your shortcut for "Save as..".
      It's what makes Gtk+ good :)

    2. Re:About GIMP2 by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Is anybody else unhappy with some of the changes in GIMP2?"

      Well, the constant crashes on the Windows version aren't an ideal advertisement for free software...

      The interface seems about the same though... not particularly easier to use, not particularly harder to use... It's the same tools and panels that were always available, so I wouldn't really expect any great productivity gains from rearranging them.

    3. Re:About GIMP2 by pavon · · Score: 1

      That won't help. The modifiers are not keyboard shortcuts, and cannot be changed that way. I haven't been able to find a way to do so, and while I am definately agree with the gnome philosophy of minimizing configurability to what is useful,
      that really is a necisarry configuration if you want nice integrate into different environments.

    4. Re:About GIMP2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the modifiers were changed to try and have consistant modifiers across all the tools Shift and Control.

      the GIMP developers have loudly stated that they are not part of GNOME (even though they use GNOME CVS, and GNOME Bugzilla).

      They do not use GNOME specific libraries.
      They do not follow the GNOME HIG.

  14. Best Game: Unreal Tourniment 2004 by ylikone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The obvious choice... I mean, were there any other commercial games released this year for Linux?

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Best Game: Unreal Tourniment 2004 by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I, for one, feel like counting chickens before they hatch and award Doom 3 the best Linux game of all time!!!!111111

      Disclaimer: Not intentionally trolling.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  15. IBM Thinkpad T41 by cuban321 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes! I have a Thinkpad T41, and it's what dreams are made of. I will never own another brand of laptop again.

    The box runs linux great, there is a great thinkpad linux mailing list, the battery life is amazing and it's fast as hell.

    Good choice linux journal...

    cuban

    1. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by moreati · · Score: 1

      This isn't a flame, I'm curious whether my aesthetics are different to the majority. Also everything I've read and heard says IBM laptops rock, which I don't doubt. I'd love to have a Thinkpad X31

      However, does anyone else find the design of all IBM Thinkpads to be absolutely butt ugly? Yes they're distinctive & not just another silvery Powerbook ripoff, but they just look so cheap and plasticy - like something out of the bargain bin.

      Anyone else?

    2. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      No,no,no.

      They are not cheap and plasticy. They are made of some sort of VERY sturdy material. I'm not sure what else to call it but carbon, but their are tough as hell. Especially the back of the LCDs.

      That's actually the first reason I bought one. I travel around the city everyday and needed something that wouldn't break easily (like a Dell or HP, which ARE made of cheap plastic).

    3. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they're distinctive & not just another silvery Powerbook ripoff, but they just look so cheap and plasticy - like something out of the bargain bin.

      I've read that they're made from carbon fiber (the case) and have some sort of strong alloy frame underneath the shell (titanium I think).

      The deal breaker for me was what I call the "pointing booger"..err trackpoint device. They added a touchpad to the model I'm interested in so that's no longer an issue. Linux compatibility, as previously mentioned, is a plus.

    4. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All Thinkpads look like that since the very first model from 1992: a rectangular black slab with a small logo on the corner in RGB. Thinkpads are not designed to attract attact attention to themselves. Powerbooks are basically designed make you advertise for Apple whenever you're working on them. Even the logo is upside down, so that everybody around you sees it in the "correct" position.

    5. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by moreati · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I knew I wouldn't be clear enough.

      I totally agree (from all reports, I've no longterm direct experience) that they're sturdy, robust, of high build quality and generally good.

      I just don't think they look it, to me the rubberised black with red trim looks awful - it reminds of how 'portable computers' looked in the pre-pentium days. It doesn't look the part compared to just about any other laptop.

      Great laptops, just very bad looking.

      Alex

    6. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > - it reminds of how 'portable computers' looked in the pre-pentium days.

      That's because ThinkPads actually did look like that in the pre-pentium days. The design of the TP has changed very little in their 12 years existance. They've gotten a lot thinner, but that's about it.

      > Great laptops, just very bad looking.

      That's pretty subjective. I happen to like the design, and I'm far from the only one.

    7. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The design is on purpose. All IBM machines from laptops to mainframes are black. It was made to match the color of the death star, the Emporer insisted way back in 1978...

    8. Re:IBM Thinkpad T41 by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I understand. I'm more into the look they have than something flashy.

  16. ThinkPad T41? by cyberkahn · · Score: 1

    The ThinkPad T41 is currently priced at $2,522.13 . They couldn't find another laptop that is more cost effective than that? One of the benefits of Linux is first the OS is free, but also it doesn't require the Spartan hardware of Windows. For $2,522.13 I could simple get one of these and not worry about getting sound drivers etc. to work.

    1. Re:ThinkPad T41? by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1

      That's funny. This is what Google found me, as I also rushed to check the marvel laptop :) Note however that this configuration is 1.4 GHz instead of 1.7 and a 40 GB HDD instead of a 60 GB one.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised.
    2. Re:ThinkPad T41? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start adding on the features of the powerbook e.g. DVD-RW and then the price moves up to the powerbook range. You are looking at a bare bones IBM lappie.

    3. Re:ThinkPad T41? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to add AppleCare (+ $349) to get the three year warranty like IBM.

    4. Re:ThinkPad T41? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      A quick Google found this site selling them from $1,367, not a bad price.

  17. Social networking sites are nothing new by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Reuven points out that the all-in-one social network sites LinkedIn, Orkut and Ryze aren't particularly useful, but he says they're "all scratching the surface of something new and interesting."

    Bull. There's nothing older; a friend invited me to join friendster, and my first comment to her was:

    "Jesus Christ, it's high school, all over again."

    It's an electronic popularity contest, with a little bit of recruitment thrown in. Most of us sit on the sidelines and watch as the really popular people amass a huge collection of friends.

    Not surprisingly, a huge number of these young 20-somethings were from NYC, and almost all of them were exactly the type I can't stand- drunk-every-night clubbers. My personal favorite was some rich-bitch french girl who was almost completely naked in all of her shots on some beach. Her profile was truly a piece of work. Example: "Things I enjoy: Not having to work. Ever."

    Friendster attracts the biggest concentration of intellectual-stuck-ups, prisses, and vanity-obsessed people I've seen in my life. Given Orkut is higher profile and more exclusive, I would imagine it's even worse.

    1. Re:Social networking sites are nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feeling rejected?

    2. Re:Social networking sites are nothing new by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

      My personal favorite was some rich-bitch french girl who was almost completely naked in all of her shots on some beach.

      You are so full of crap. Prove it. Show me a link. Let me see the pictures and judge for myself.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Social networking sites are nothing new by InsaneCreator · · Score: 1

      Friendster attracts the biggest concentration of intellectual-stuck-ups, prisses, and vanity-obsessed people I've seen in my life

      Invite me! Invite me! Oh God, please invite me...

  18. Re:werd 2 eugenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    URL?

  19. Re:Poll: WHICH IS BETTER by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All I know is, pictures of Ceren always make me happy that I'm married! I'll burn karma, I don't care, she's awful. /me shivers and says "UGGGGGH!!!"

    CB

  20. MyPostgreSQL by InsaneCreator · · Score: 1

    the MySQL team is making impressive inroads, and I expect to see them close the gap with PostgreSQL in the coming years

    He should take a look at the list of new features in the upcoming version of PostgreSQL which includes savepoints, point in time recovery, tablespaces and a bunch of smaller stuff. Meanwhile, MySQL folks are still struggling with some features which were supported by Postgres almost a decade ago. I'd say the gap is getting bigger, not smaller. Much bigger!

    Sure, MySQL is great for what it's used for most, but I don't think it is getting anywhere near being a heavyweight database engine. It does make a nice retrieve-by-id shortcut for displaying web page content, though.

    1. Re:MyPostgreSQL by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Postgresql is awsome but so are firebird and sapdb. This year ingres from CA is about to be open sourced. I have never used it but it's certainly an enterprise ready database.

      If you ask me the people at mysql should abandon their quest to make mysql into postgres. Every feature you add is just going to make it slower and more complicated so why not leave mysql as the lightweight, fast alternative to full featured databases I listed above.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:MyPostgreSQL by jadavis · · Score: 1

      I'd also like to add a couple points:

      (1) PostgreSQL will have a native win32 port

      (2) It has a new caching algorithm which should significantly improve the cache hit rate in most real-world situations. Specifically, they are changing from a "least-recently updated" algorithm (LRU) to a system that accounts for how often the page was accessed. In the old caching system, if a large table scan was done, the cache would be polluted and your small, frequently-accessed table wouldn't be in cache.

      (3) point-in-time recovery implies incremental backups, which are also very valuable

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    3. Re:MyPostgreSQL by jadavis · · Score: 1

      people at mysql should abandon their quest to make mysql into postgres

      I haven't seen much evidence that MySQL wants to be like PostgreSQL.

      My impression is that MySQL outright rejects many fundamental philosophies of PostgreSQL. For instance, in MySQL, it's legal to enter the date Feb 31st. I'm confident that the MySQL developers could fix that, but their philosophy is to put the responsibility into the application. MySQL also has the philosphy that if an error is encountered, keep going.

      Contrast with PostgreSQL, which regidly enforces contraints and will most certainly give you an error if it encounters any problem or ambiguity. It also allows application developers to place more responsibility on the database.

      The MySQL approach is perfectly valid. After all it's easier (read: cheaper) to stack up more application servers than to cluster a database.

      However, I rarely see business rules effectively enforced in an application. Also, consider if you have multiple applications accessing the same database. If your data is inconsistant with your business rules, where is the bug? It could be in any of the applications, and it could be compounded throughout all of them as they see the invalid data. It's a debugging nightmare. Contrast with PostgreSQL: you just have constraints to enforce your business rules, and the app with the bug will encounter an error and will be stopped in its tracks before another application is affected.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    4. Re:MyPostgreSQL by killjoe · · Score: 1

      The folks at mysql are busy adding things like stored procedures, triggers and all kinds of doodads. They already have sapdb so why bother. Keep mysql what it is. A lightweight sql interface for the filesystem.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:MyPostgreSQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi!

      MySQL/InnoDB support transaction savepoints since MySQL-4.0.14, released in July 2003.

      MySQL/InnoDB support multiple tablespaces since 4.1.1, released in December 2003.

      MySQL has supported point-in-time recovery for many years now, through the binlogging mechanism.

      Best regards,

      Heikki Tuuri
      Innobase Oy

  21. Re:Poll: WHICH IS BETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Isn't it strange how totally different peoples' tastes can be?

    I think Ceren is one of the cutest girls I've ever seen.

  22. Congrats to GnuCash by D.+Book · · Score: 4, Informative

    Congratulations to GnuCash on winning the "Desktop Software" category.

    Nice to see some recognition for one of the most unglamorous and underappreciated of all the major free software projects. Originally a Quicken user, I started feeling disempowered by its mandatory activation/registration (in the Australian edition) and reports from other users that the next version displayed advertising (of Quicken's services). It made me angry enough to search for alternatives, and I was sufficently motivated to create a partition for GNU/Linux specifically so that I could use GnuCash once a week. Not something I'd expect Joe User to do, but experienced Windows tinkerers like myself can certainly handle it, and the experience will also make my eventual switch to Linux easier. I've seen where Windows and proprietary software is pushing the industry (toward DRM, software patents, more products needing activation, etc.) and I don't like it one bit. But I digress...

    I would like to comment that GnuCash is frequently criticised as being too difficult for personal finances because of the "double-entry" system it uses. People who don't know better see the words "double entry" and the first thing they think (incorrectly) is "WTF, I have to enter each transaction TWICE?!". Please stop scaring people away with this FUD because, in a practical sense, GnuCash's double-entry foundation is of little consequence to former users of Quicken or similar programs. All it means is that everything that Quicken calls a "category" is an "account" instead. The power of the centuries old accounting practice is there if you need it, but in day to day use there's hardly a difference. Some people believe that GnuCash is more difficult to use than Quicken, but this has more to do with others things (perhaps its interface and the fact that it's also intended to cater to business users).

    1. Re:Congrats to GnuCash by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

      I admit, I was one of the folks frightened away by the term "double-entry bookkeeping", so I started using CBTracker instead. It's a nice little checkbook program that's simpler than Quicken but is quite adequate for most people.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    2. Re:Congrats to GnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Number one issue I have with GnuCash: dependency hell. Forget DLL hell; GnuCash's requirements are far, far worse than anything you're likely to see in Microsoft land.

      Let me put it to you simply: I installed fink on OS X to do the GnuCash thing. I said "install GnuCash". Fink's response? "Sure, I can do that! Oh, by the way, you'll also need these 86 other packages." Eighty six?! What the fsck are these guys thinking?

      Could somebody please explain to me just why an accounting package needs, for example, the "audiofile" shared libraries package? Or esound, for that matter? I certainly haven't heard any beeps, boops, bells, whistles, or gongs out of GnuCash since I started using it.

      I pity those poor souls who like to build everything from source by hand -- they'll be here until Christmas trying to sort out all the things GnuCash needs, and even then, they're likely to have missed one or two.

  23. Actually, that's a pretty good comparison by jbellis · · Score: 1

    Thinkpads and Powerbooks are the top-of-the-line laptops available today. Period. Which you go for is substantially a matter of taste, but my brother (who bought a powerbook) has been coveting my thinkpad T40 (third thinkpad model I've owned) more than a little lately, OSX notwithstanding.

  24. crap by jbellis · · Score: 2, Funny

    when did we start seeing LICENSE fanboys? /must be getting old

  25. Re:I would've liked to see MySQL win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just faster that PostgreSQL

    Proof, please.

    it's release on GPL instead of the BSD license

    Ignorance. An end-user doesn't care. BSD is so much freer that you can just take the BSD code, GPL it, add your changes and require that any other changes (to your modifications) be GPL'd.

  26. Bitkeeper over Subversion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have insight as to why Bitkeeper was chosen over Subversion? This surprised me; am I the only one?

  27. Re:Poll: WHICH IS BETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are you talking about?

  28. Re:I would've liked to see MySQL win by jadavis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    GPL instead of the BSD license

    Funny how MySQL releases even the client libraries as GPL instead of LGPL.

    That means you can't even ship your non-GPL product with MySQL support unless you buy a commercial license from MySQL AB. Commercial databases such as Oracle don't even have this restriction!

    --
    Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
  29. Re:Poll: WHICH IS BETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on... I mean, who can resist these eyes?

  30. Translation by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 1

    Our editors are all business and turned up their noses at selecting favorite games. These are the kind of people you want to hire to roll out your company desktop systems.

    Translation:

    "We didn't want to do any research. That doesn't make us bad journalists... does it??

  31. Project of the year--- How can you tell? by xiphmont · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll offer this comment about Ardour; I'm the author of Postfish, Ogg and a regular contributor to Audacity. I've been hearing good thigns about Ardour for more than a year and have thus tried repeatedly to try it out.

    a) No manual. No usable manual anyway. I know no one who uses it, so I have no 'live' manual to get me going either. Lots of apps don't have good manuals, but this goes along with b...

    b) 'Angry fruit salad' user interface. Lots of functionality [apparently] brilliantly obfuscated by a million buttons in every imaginable color grouped randomly with no real UI intuitiveness to make up for the missing manual. I'm no newbie to pro audio; recording and mastering soundtrack CDs for local theatre groups is one of my pasttimes. But I cannot figure out how to even get started. I spend about an hour on step one every couple of months and have never succeeded in getting it to do anything with the 400G of raw digital audio sitting on my box.

    The end result is that I've been unable to figure out how to find the most rudimentary starting-out functions. I already have all my audio; Ardour is too heavy to run on my portable recording boxes-- I have beaverphonic already doing my HD recording for the past several years-- so how do I do anything using Ardour with audio I already have? The manual's tutorials all begin with 'press the record button...' The FAQ says I can use it with my recordings, but the UI and manual conspire to convince me none of that functionality actually exists.

    All this *is* a flame-- Ardour is supposedly good software but all it's done is waste my time and for that reason I'm annoyed-- but it's also a genuine request of the Ardour authors to help out all us poor folks that aren't Ardour hackers to get started. I'd love to see what this package can do and give it a fair shake.

    Monty

    1. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by paulbd · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure its worth going into this here, since monty and i have shared our fair share of flames and discussions on irc.

      all i can say right now is that i don't like the fact that we have no manual, but that i have worked my ass off on this project for 4 years, and there is a limit to what i can do. and because i want to use the blender model (software: $$ free, manual: revenue source), its not really feasible for other people to write The Manual. however, i can't stop other people from writing manuals. strangely, though, from all the complaints about the opaque functionality, no such manuals have emerged. perhaps people really want me to make a living from this thing after all ...

      as for "a million buttons", we have less buttons than protools and samplitude, so that can hardly be a central issue. if you don't like the colors, you can change them without recompiling, or you could pay or otherwise convince someone to do a new GTK theme (an alternative one already exists that may become the default for 1.0).

      i would love to see ardour be simpler for new users to just walk in and start using. but i am more concerned that the software architecture is adequate for the extraordinary things that a DAW is expected to do. as my confidence in that grows, actually writing the manual starts to make more and more sense.

      and yes, ardour's bias has been towards *recording* audio because i wrote it as a tool for use recording studios. it has slowly started to adopt more functionality when it comes to handling existing audio files, including (these days) full support for drag-n-drop direct from nautilus and similar file system browsers.

      finally, we have lots of new users who stop by the #ardour IRC channel and get lots of help from everyone including pro-users, other new users, experienced users and the core developers. the majority of them get things figured out pretty quickly and then seem quite happy. not the best possible "new user" experience, but not the worst either.

    2. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm not sure its worth going into this here, since monty and i have shared our fair share of flames and discussions on irc.

      Monty is a professional recording engineer. If he can't figure Ardour out then the Ardour has some serious problems.


      but that i have worked my ass off on this project for 4 years, and because i want to use the blender model (software: $$ free, manual: revenue source), its not really feasible for other people to write The Manual.

      My 3 cents:

      1) Thank you Paul for your generous gift of 4 years of full time work. Unfortunately the free software model will not let you re-coup that 4 year development investment. You need to think of that time as a gift. The only way to make money is to look forward. Not what have you done, but what can you do, and who of course will pay for that future. All important business decisions. ...

      2) Selling a user manual is not a viable open source business model unless of course you are an O'Reilly. Hmm but then O'Reilly doesn't pay for software development. Goto #1.

      3) Fact is that if there's a market then someone else will write a manual. A better manual. A more popular manual. This sort of thinking should be encouraged. A third party manual is a sign of success.

    3. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by paulbd · · Score: 1
      recouping the costs over 4-5 years has never been the goal. just making a modest living continuing to do this kind of work is.

      the manual is not the only element in the revenue strategy - i would be stupid if i believed that could ever work. but its a significant element. i've already been approached by another moderately well-known open source-related publisher about doing the manual as "a book".

      the main point of me doing the manual is to give people something tangible when they pay to get ardour. sure, there might be others (c.f. craig anderton's endless list of books on cubase, sonar etc), but this is the one you can pay for and feel good about doing so :)

      the full revenue model involves the manual, sponsorship, contract work, partnerships, support, donations and possibly grants.

      btw, monty may be a pro engineer. but the forums for proprietary DAWs are full of comments from people who are "pro engineers" who can't figure out how to do basic stuff. this is not unique to ardour. DAWs are probably among the most complex software used by a single person, and its certainly the most complex thing i've ever been involved with (much more complex, say, than telephone switching software).

    4. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by xiphmont · · Score: 1

      I don't actually object to that development model in any way; there's nothing unreasonable about it, and I've strongly considered it myself.

      I was complaining about one and only one thing: For the life of me, I can't figure out how to make it do *anything*. The number of buttons has nothing to do with this; most of my physical control surfaces have even more physical buttons than six copies of Ardour.

      If I knew it would give me something my current tools don't, great! I'd happily buy the manual and figure out how to use it. But given that my needs are fufilled (as far as I know anyway; I'm always looking for better), and I can't make heads or tails of Ardour, I'm instead happily not going to be buying the manual. For now anyway.

      So... How *do* you use it to do anything with audio you already have on disk? I notice you didn't answer that question ;-)

      Monty

    5. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by ageitgey · · Score: 1

      For what it is worth, I think your program is awesome. Yes, some UI work would be great at some point, but high-end software in any industry tends to be complex because the functions being performed are complex. I don't think there is anything on linux that can touch what you are doing for the high-end pro audience. As a recording hobbyist who gets to use pro-quality software for free, I could not be happier :)

      --
      Uninnovate - Only the finest in engineering.
    6. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by sharph · · Score: 1

      create an audio track, then drag the audio in from a good file manager, or set the edit point to where you want the audio to start, right click in the tracking area to bring up a context menu, then go to edit, then insert external sndfile.

      Paul did actually say you could drag things in somewhere in this thread I think.

      And while I have the chance, thank you for all the things xiph has done.

      - Sharp

    7. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Why write a massive manual when you can write lots of little tooltips?
      Do the buttons not already have tooltips?
      Do you not provide status bar messages whenever possible?
      (okay so it doesn't seem to have a status bar but you get the idea).

      There are other ways to provide user feedback besides a manual, and although for a program like Ardour a manual will always be needed if you can provide lots of other feedback users wont need it so quickly.

    8. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by paulbd · · Score: 1

      there is no notion of "opening" an existing file, because ardour isn't a soundfile editor. you work with sessions, which may contain hundreds or thousands or files (or just one, if you wish). so the first thing you have to do, as indicated by the big message in the editor window, is to create a new session (Session->New).

      because ardour (like other DAWs) uses a track-based metaphor, you then have to create 1 or more tracks in which to place the audio you want to work with. in anything less than current CVS, Session->Add Track, then you can use the context menu for the track to embed an external soundfile. alternatively, click on the "title bar" of the region list, and use the menu to import (ie. copy and convert to native format) or embed (ie. link to and use as-is) existing audio files.

      with current CVS you can simply drag-n-drop an audio file from nautilus etc. (in any format understood by libsndfile) into the editor window (the big blank area), and ardour will create appropriately configured tracks for you.

      we've played with the idea of having a default session when you start up ardour. but its rather hard, because a session is a directory, not a single file, and figuring out how to handle "save" operations before the location is defined (there are several auto-save points that you can't avoid) is rather tricky.

      as for what it can do that your current tools don't: if you're using soundfile editors like audacity, there is no notion of "region based" editing. ardour's editor is completely non-linear and completely non-destructive and it operates on units of informations (regions) that are assumed to have some semantic significance. metaphorically, you are laying out audio (and later MIDI and OSC) on a "canvas", not slicing and dicing the contents of a single file. it has also been my experience that most soundfile editors do not offer musical time axes, which for most "musical" editing can be deeply problematic. sequencers like rosegarden and muse obviously do, and they offer some of ardour's audio features, but a tiny subset of the set of things that ProTools users always present me with when they say "I bet Ardour doesn't do ...".

      that's ignoring all manner of other things related to its highly evolved mixer architecture and signal routing possibilities.

    9. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by xiphmont · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I will point out that many pro sound engineers are not also even more pro computer people. I help write DAW software... and couldn't figure out how to work on an existing file without you telling me. Most people who try out Ardour won't complain if they can't get it to work. The majority tends to give up and wander away; that's a problem for all of us.

      [also, a disclaimer. I'm only 'semi-pro'; I take money but don't pretend to live on it as a career. That said, I do have an annoying penchant for expensive equipment]

      Monty

    10. Re:Project of the year--- How can you tell? by paulbd · · Score: 1

      all true. but here's my favorite story for this department. pro-audio-engineer but non-computer user buys Digital Performer and a G5. installs RME hammerfall. tries to record 8 tracks straight in from an ADAT.

      there's no audio signal.

      to test, user drags audio file into session. cool, region appears. test playback. no signal and no meters. no amount of anything will produce output. user switches to builtin audio. still no output.

      2hrs later, after a support phone call, it is revealed that regions derived from files whose SR differs from the session will be silent. no visual indication or warning of this is ever given in the main editor window.

      this is from a product judged to be one of the big 4 or 5 ... the user has had this system for nearly a year and has still never actually used it.

  32. Ardour and lack of originality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Paul for your hard work on Ardour. I wish you good luck in evolving your UI into a nicer package. The low end infrastructure / architecture is always the easy part. A nice friendly UI is the hard part. It will be interesting watching your progress. Which leads me to ...

    Compare the screenshots of Ardour to Protools.

    As a Linux desktop user I am concerned about the future and prosperity of the Linux desktop. It seems that free software can't create much truly original work. For example: Evolution is a clone of Outlook. Gimp is a clone of Photoshop. Octave is a clone of Matlab. Open Office is a clone of Microsoft Office. Ardour is a clone of Protools, Nuendo, and Samplitude. ... And many of these are lesser quality clones at that.

    This isn't a slam since I personally love using these Linux programs but it is troubling nonetheless. How can the Linux software world hope to compete with the Microsoft world when it's most popular apps are just clones?

    Is originality even important anymore?

    I think we can do better.

    1. Re:Ardour and lack of originality? by paulbd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      do you know why Protools looks the way it does? because they have hundreds of beta testers and serious users offering them feedback at every step of their game. there isn't one thing in PT that hasn't been driven by user feedback - that may be good or bad, but it does mean that the UI is driven by user demands.

      second, there is no "MS world" here - the flagship DAWs all started life on the Mac. hell, 4 years ago, PT was only certified to run on a *single* intel-based system (from IBM).

      third, DAWs have all pretty much converged on the exact same feature set. you could feel that in the air at NAMM this year - nobody knows where to go next (well, the ardour project does, but it will be a while before we do). ardour attempts to get the best ideas from all of them, so although our UI is structured roughly like PT, we include the new "editor-window-mixer-strip" that originated in SX and is now in Sonar as well.

    2. Re:Ardour and lack of originality? by xiphmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a good reason why alot of user-application software happens first on systems like the Mac or Windows and comes to Linux second. It all has to do with what's a commodity and what isn't. The OS is a commodity (always was, actually, although people haven't realized that until lately). Text editors are a commodity. Web servers are a commodity. So are browsers. MP3 encoders are another.

      These are all things that, for the most part, people are no longer willing to pay money for. For that reason, you don't see big companies trying very hard to develop them (except for Windows/MS, and that's a special case for oh so many reasons. I expect the Mafia could make alot of money selling ice cubes to Eskimos too ;-)

      DAWs have happened on commercial platforms first because there was money to be made on the hardware and there was money to be made on the software too. Open Source dogma aside, money *does* fuel innovation, and while a truly new and original application is working out the Right Way to do something for the first time, there's money to be made there... and while these software vendors are small and hungry, money does help the work get done faster.

      With DAWs, Paul himself has said 'everyone has converged on the same feature set', an indication that all the innovation is more or less over, all the Big Problems mostly solved, and that this niche is about to commoditize. At that point the margins erode, the previously small fast hungry companies are now big, comfortable slow companies trying to hold onto what they've got and you see nothing really new appear--- although those big slow companies are desperately trying to cram new (mostly useless) 'features' into endless 'upgrades' to get people to keep spending money, be it on their software or their hardware. ...and this is _one_ of the places where Open Source steps into the picture naturally. When the DAW becomes a piece of commodity public infrastructure, OSS will come to offer the best choice: streamlined, debugged, interested in giving the user what they want rather than taking the user's money first, everything else is second. After all... the purpose of a company is to make money. "You don't need a product to make money... customers alone will do."

      Although OSS has driven and does drive innovation, don't overlook that one of its great roles is provide and maintain quality software in all those niches where Corporate America no longer feels like spending a great deal of its attention. Microsoft won the browser war, and hasn't released a new IE in years. Without Mozilla, we'd not have had a new browser in coming up on six years.

      So accusing Ardour, or many other OSS workalikes of being clones isn't fair. They wouldn't exist if there was no need.

      Monty

    3. Re:Ardour and lack of originality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is originality even important anymore?

      Originality is not half as important as producing an application that people can work with now and improve later. (The Linux kernel didn't innovate when it was just getting started, copied Minix, followed POSIX.)

      I cannot take your post seriously because the GIMP is so different from photoshop, in fact people always complain loudly about how different it is.
      Corel Painter and many other applications are much more like Photoshop than GIMP is.

      If you design a hammer it is going to look a lot like other hammers. The first cars were designed to look like horse drawn carriages. As the software matures and support for new features are added it will inevitably change and adapt and become more distintive.

  33. Re:I would've liked to see MySQL win by Unordained · · Score: 1

    ... and also note that mysql wants to charge you a fee if you use it in your business (if it ever makes a difference in your revenue) regardless of whether or not you want support.

    postgresql and firebird are both free for personal -and- corporate use, as I recall. they're both slower for the sorts of things mysql users usually want (retrieve by id, grab entire slice of the db to post-process in app code), but both enforce constraints, have stored procedures, good transaction handling (a comment above says postgres is getting savepoints, firebird already has savepoints; postgres is also from the looks of it getting nested transactions which firebird isn't), etc ... and you are free to make non-gpl apps with support for these databases (and even include a copy of the db installer too) even in corporate settings. I suppose the mysql-killer would be a featureless version of either of these db's -- faster, less sane, but still free ...

  34. Game award is a disgrace. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am a subscriber of the magazine and frankly found their choice of "game" abysmal since what they chose is not a game, no matter how they want to spin it.

    I think Linux game developpers, that are fighting one of the most ungrateful tasks to make a Linux desktop a reality, should not be thrilled by being blantantly ignored by people that are suppossed to be knowledgable about Linux.

    If the LJ editors do not use games, then the honorable choice would have been to either not to give an award or to delegate the selection on people knowledgable about this field.

    Of all the possible choices they took the worst: to insult the intelligence of their readers and of Linux game developpers.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  35. Best Laptop by sgtron · · Score: 1

    Amazing they didn't pick one of the "Linux Certified" models like the LC2430. I would have figured a better standing for a company that specializes in Linux Laptops instead of just one that you can install Linux on.

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
  36. It should really be... KolourPaint by fprog · · Score: 1, Informative

    The greatest Graphics Software this year, is not "The GIMP", it's KolourPaint! Alias Microsoft Paint KDE clone.

  37. Alternatives? by kingLatency · · Score: 1

    Well, even if you're dissatisfied with some new things in The GIMP, is there an alternative you'd prefer? Even if it isn't perfect, it still could be (is) the best option available.

    --
    "I've got to stop masturbating! It makes me too lazy! Stop it, Albert. Stop it." -- Albert Einstein