Slashdot Mirror


Helix Player and RealPlayer 10 Released

kforeman writes "The RealPlayer 10 for Linux and its underlying 100% open source Helix Player are now both finalized. The RealPlayer 10 for Linux has many new features including a Mozilla plug-in, so you can now enjoy all those embedded media clips, as well as the latest RealAudio 10, RealVideo 10, MP3, Flash, and Ogg Vorbis and Theora support. The Helix Player is 100% open source, (now including the GPL!) and includes support for SMIL 2.0 and open source codecs Ogg Vorbis and Theora. Our goal is to make the Linux desktop a first class citizen and we think today's releases are a good first step in that direction."

25 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. excellent! by hoborocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now I don't have to use that pesky, non-intrusive, non-commerical, non-irritating, non-email-address-asking Xine!

    --
    AccountKiller
  2. Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be very concered about hidden spyware/trojans in these programs based on Real's past releases. Is the RealPlayer/Helix relationship similar to Mozilla/Netscape?

    1. Re:Spyware by LordK2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be very concered about hidden spyware/trojans in these programs based on Real's past releases

      And just how long do you think that they would get away with that in an open-source project?


      K

  3. One question: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hate to say it, but why on Earth would anyone willingly use RealPlayer? Maybe the Linux version will be different, but I hate the Windows version. Bloated, slow, and full of ads. And where are those near-CD streams? I can find tons of them in MP3 format, but I can't recall the last time I heard a high-res Real stream.

  4. Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's slashdot code to hate Real, but they've finally done something good. They continue to support Linux, and gave us the core of their player (which, IMO no longer sucks ass) and we're still criticizing them? Has anyone here even used Realplayer 10 Linux or Helix?

    For christ's sake, you're all like one of those Windows users who will never touch Linux again because "it's all command line" or a Mac since "longhorn will have a 3D UI". Give the company another fucking shot, it's not every day we get a decent media player that supports Theora, Vorbis or their own codecs.

    1. Re:Going against code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just don't expect this behavior to instantly wipe out years of previous history.

      History of what, killing children? Just because a couple of years ago they made a shitty product does NOT mean we should avoid them now. It was horrible, so what?

      A bad product can be forgiven, and I don't see why all of a sudden "It's different" with Real. Netscape had a horrible product, they come out with Mozilla, we embrace it. But as for Real and Helix, avoidance is continued like they have the plague or something?

    2. Re:Going against code. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      playing hide-the-link

      As someone who had to dig through the site numerous times to install "hidden" versions, I can understand being annoyed at Real, but I can't understand holding it against them. I mean, their business model has always included selling a "premium" player. It seems to me that the fact that they were giving away a gratis version should mitigate the fact that it wasn't prominently linked on the front page of their site.

      Should we be angry at department stores for not putting their brand-name clearance racks immediately inside the front door, or is it understandable that they make you walk past the regular-price goods in order to get to them?

      There are plenty of legitimate reasons to dislike the old Real. Making you dig through their site for a free version of their flagship product isn't one of them.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  5. Re:Neat. by AirP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And along those lines... why linux when we have windows!

  6. Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...then you may have a point.

    How is Linux suppose to be ready for the desktop if developers/users continue with 'patents be damned' attitude?

    Xine and MPlayer aren't legal in many major markets. That rules them out for many of us.

    Helix is legal and backed by RealNetworks legal department.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      that's not an excuse. just buy (e.g.) a SuSE Linux box and install that on all your computers. being a legal product it has all the questionable components removed.

      applying your logic, how can Windows be ready for the desktop when a huge fraction of users have illegal copies of Windows, Office and other software?

    2. Re:Let me know when EFF clears Xine.... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The patent system seems to work ok for mechanical inventions, but is terribly broken for software.
      I would bet it's probably impossible to write *any* software which does not violate patents that have been given out and for every valid patent there's probably 1000 invalid ones.
      These being the conditions, it's much better to ignore the broken system, that way *if* you ever get sued and *if* you loose, you won't have to pay tripple damages.
      Not to mention that most of the world does not care about software patents. Only one country cares with 1/12th of the population on the planet. Worse, probably only 0.1% of that country would actually benefit or want software patents.
      So, only about 1/12000 of the worlds population cares about software patents. They just happen to also be among the richest and most powerful and manage to buy ridiculous laws and "free trade agreements".

      --

      Liberty.

  7. Re:One question: Why? by WWWWolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I recently tried RealPlayer 10's beta for Linux. It's actually pretty slick (well, it was beta, so it was a bit unstable at times, but hey...) and plays Icecast streams in Ogg Vorbis pretty damn well (and you can get just plain Helix Player for that too, without RealVideo support). It was small, not too slow (Linux versions of RP are never ever slow!) and there's no trace of ads!

    Yeah, Windows players are probably hell, but the *NIX players have the history of ruling, at least to small extent =)

    But to be perfectly honest, the real reason I switched from RP8 to RP10beta was the support for XVideo extension and actual support for fullscreen playing. Makes watching some videos far less annoying when you don't need to maximize the window and fullscreen mode doesn't eat all processor. And, yuck, RP8 was a Motif app and RP10 uses GTK+2.

  8. First Impression by Pecisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, it doesn't require any kind of email registration. Second, it based on GTK - that's great, no more outdated Modif GUI. Let's see how it will be handled. I would like to point out that if we would have two descent Media frameworks - Helix and GStreamer (which still has to mature), then it would be very good. It's nice to see that Real learns something from their past.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  9. Yes ! by Mr+Europe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now there's no reason not to get it in Debian!
    Someone please put up a Debian-package !

  10. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    because mplayer is infamous for it's inclusion of questionable codecs. xine is pretty much more of the same. distributors like redhat (and fedora) are looking for media players that are as GPL friendly and LEGAL as possible.

    a player that only does Ogg[Vorbis|Theora] falls quite nicely into that slot.

    does anyone know about the ability to create plugins? it'd be great to have a unified player that takes easy mp3/xvid/dvd plugins.

  11. It doesn't work with Amazon's music clips by jonfelder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting, when I try to listen to an audio clip on Amazon.com with Real Player 10, I get an error about the codec being too old and no longer supported.

  12. Re:Why is this forcing me to use IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps that's because you're logged into Mozilla/Firefox, but you're not in IE? I'm finding that being logged out makes me not get 503's..

  13. Re:Neat. by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why bother with Helix when there are other freely-availble, open-source alternatives (e.g., mplayer, xine) that appear equally capable of supporting a variety of player formats?

    Have you actually tried HelixPlayer, or the RealPlayer for Linux? They are, in fact, very nice, with simple clean minimalist interfaces using GTK. No ugly skinning, no bizarre file selection dialogs (just plain GTK file selection dialogs), no relying on keyboard shortcuts.

    I like Mplayer, and I use it a lot, but HelixPlayer really is very nice, and I'm using it more and more. Don't knock it until you've tried it. Real seems to have turned a corner here and gone open source. HelixPlayer is a great open source project, and the RealPlayer based on it is not the intrusive email collecting mess that one used to associate with Real.

    I know many here hate Real, and it's understandable given their previous efforts, but they do seem to have changed, and I think they're worthy of a second chance here... now if only they'd free up their codec...

    Jedidiah.

  14. Helix player for Windows by CdBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I understand it, Helix was a community-led project to design a cross-platform media player framework, the Helix Player, which is then used by Realnetworks to make their RealPlayer application with the addition of closed-source codecs and probably a degree of Real's nagware added in

    So: Where.. or when, can I download Helix Player for Windows? I don't want or need Real's codecs on my system, but if the player is as good as people say I may consider using it instead of Windows Media Player for watching my downloaded movie files

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  15. The Story of A Shepherd Who always lied... by kc_cyrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    about wolves attacking his flocks...untill one time it REALLY happened and no one believed him anuymore.
    Now it's the same story for RealNetworks, No ONE believe them anymore after their dark past.

  16. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I can only speak for myself, but I will *never* use another Real product or support any website/organization that uses their products.
    That's your loss. That's the tragic thing about it.
  17. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by Roark+Meets+Dent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish you had actually speficied what the damn good reason is -- I'd like to know -- instead of just putting the word "damn" between two asterisks for added emphasis. Really, capital letters should have been used for that instead.

  18. Re:No Ads Now makes is alright? by catbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what, I'm supposed to believe that they won't put them back in when its convenient to them? I don't think so.

    Why don't you wait till they do, and stop using it then?

    As it is, you are providing them no incentive to correct their past mistakes.

  19. Re:Wrong ... by Homology · · Score: 2, Insightful
    , and furthermore it is illegal (DMCA ...) to distribute them with libdvdread.

    Erh, US law does not apply outside USA. But with Bush Jr. in power, I suppose you can be forgiven this misunderstanding.

  20. Re:Wrong ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dont thin that the US is the center of the world , do you ? if its illegal in your country i msut not be illegal in another country. By fact it is most legal in most countries of this world. so stop spreading so much nonsense like : it is illegal.

    perhaps you could write : its illegal in the US, the US always wanted to play a special role on the globe, so you have it here. But please keep other countries off this illegal stuff.

    In China and India (which are 2/3) of the population of the world this is perfectly legal.