Slashdot Mirror


Virginia Tech "Corpse Plant" To Bloom On August 4th

Radical Rad writes "Virginia Tech has a second Amorphophallus titanum, or 'corpse plant,' ready to bloom and emit its intensely powerful stench. The plant only blooms once every 4 to 20 years and lasts only 2-3 days. Its stench attracts carrion beetles and flesh flies to pollinate it. See this link for photos of the bloom." Instant road-trip excuse.

6 of 40 comments (clear)

  1. its also blooming here by 8up · · Score: 4, Informative

    the flower in question is also in bloom at the Atlanta Botanical Gardens - http://www.atlantabotanicalgarden.org/events_and_e xhibits/events/stinkyflower.htm

    --
    http://www.segment.org/~8up
    1. Re:its also blooming here by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Informative

      Atlanta Botanical Gardens - go there for the Chihuly ehibit; stay for the stinkplant!
      (I was there a couple of weeks ago, and saw both.
      It's worth the $12/head if you're in the area and have a few hours to kill.)

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  2. also at by timothv · · Score: 3, Informative

    This corpse flower at UCDavis is blooming in 2-3 days as well. Amazing timing.

  3. There are more in Miami by juggledean · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are many pages and pictures at Fairchild Tropical Garden. There is even an animated gif

    It's a huge flower.

  4. This week at UW-Madison by bubblewrapgrl · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the several Titan arum plants that are at UW-Madison is also blooming this week (called "Little Stinker"). The link has daily updates on this specific plant and also some general information on the species.

    http://www.news.wisc.edu/titanarum2004/index.html

  5. Re:There are more in Miami - split infinitive :-( by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

    Split infinitives are fairly hotly debated (as such topics go) amongst the elite grammarians. I remember reading a few years ago that the usage that has been condemned for more than 200 years is now becoming acceptable. While I couldn't find that article specifically, the following excerpt covers the gist of it.

    From The American Heritage Book of English Usage, 1996:

    The only rationale for condemning the construction is based on a false analogy with Latin. The thinking is that because the Latin infinitive is a single word, the English infinitive should be treated as if it were a single unit. But English is not Latin, and people split infinitives all the time without giving it a thought. Should we condemn compound infinitives, such as I want to go and have a look, simply because the infinitive have has no to next to it?

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.