Slashdot Mirror


Debian Installer RC1 Is Out

rekt writes "The Debian crew has just announced the release of debian-installer RC1. You can find versions of it for 11 different architectures at the d-i page. This is one of the most flexible, modular installer architectures out there. As we near the release of sarge (debian 3.1) next month, it's important that we find and work out any bugs in the installer. Grab a copy and give it a shot!"

6 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. It actually works by n6mod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've done four installs with a just-slightly-pre-RC1 netinst snapshot, and in all cases the installer produced a working system with a functional KDE desktop (yes, working X out of the box).

    The X settings were pretty conservative, but they were functional.

    This was such a shock to me that I really believed I'd burned too much karma and was likely to be hit by a bus on the way home.

    I can actually recommend using the native installer instead of Knoppix to do a Debian install now.

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  2. From my experience as a alpha/beta tester... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...for the upcoming release (and mostly for the new installer), I have observed that a few of the Debian developpers have been less than responsive to major bug reports (like, big common average things not detected automagically as it is with other distros). This, with the fact that Joey Hess quit as release manager just recently, i.e. at a critical stage of the Sarge release, has me starting to wonder about Debian's future.

    Has Debian hit the ceiling in terms of what a volunteer org. can acheive? I mean, are projects of this size be developped and delivered successfully by orgs such as Debian?

    It took *forever* for Sarge to come out and my impression (I hope I am wrong) is that the installer will compare negatively with other distros installers. This and other config/post-install details that are bad in my mind make me truly wonder if Debian can continue in its current shape.

    Is it because of the incessant splitting of hairs on "political" issues or what, I don't know. But to push Joey Hess to quit, something bad must be happening at the core of Debian.

    Maybe I'm overly pessimistic because I'm transposing my personal non-tech feelings on everything today (I am in the doghouse with the girl-friend, long story), but the bad vibes I got when learning of the resignation of the Debian Sarge release coordinator do pre-dates my current predicament.

    I wonder if Joey Hess did say anything (interview, somewhere?) about all of this. Joey, if you are reading this, can you comment with some insider's perspective?

    1. Re:From my experience as a alpha/beta tester... by zerblat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      [...]the fact that Joey Hess quit as release manager just recently[...]
      AFAIK, Joey Hess was never release manager. OTOH, Anthony Towns, the previous RM recently resigned. I don't know why he chose to resign, but I'm guessing that it has to do with the fact that being RM is an extremly stressful position, and there's been various incidents, e.g. the discussion about the inclusion of non-free non-software in sarge, the attempt to force amd64 into sarge, etc. I don't know.
      Has Debian hit the ceiling in terms of what a volunteer org. can acheive?
      I don't see any reason to believe that.
      It took *forever* for Sarge to come out[...]
      So did woody. Woody was delayed because d-i wasn't anywhere near finished, and they had to pick up boot-floppies and hack it into something installable. Sarge was delayed because d-i took a while to finish -- in part because very little work was done while boot-floppies was worked on for woody.
      I wonder if Joey Hess did say anything (interview, somewhere?) about all of this.
      Joey has a blog where you can read his thoughts. Of course, I'm guessing you're really interested in aj's comments.
      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
  3. Re:Screenshots by cmacb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Be careful what you wish for. The best Windows installer IMHO was the one for NT. After that they started trying to detect too many devices that would hang the whole process.

    I think the original plan for this Debian release was for a graphical installer, but to be honest I'd rather have one that JUST WORKS, producing a bootable system that can be tinkered with to deal with anything that's not perfect. The new installer, from my experience has improved the detection of devices, reduced the number of questions asked of the user. Once all these things are perfected (or nearly so) I suppose making it graphical will be a nice way to, um, slow down the whole process like Windows does. I can live without it.

    Unlike Windows, the Linux install process is not a monthly maintenance task, so I hardly think it matters how it looks.

  4. Re:New installer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, the new one just looks identical to the old one. It can have a GUI thrown over the top, though, by anyone. Debian just hasn't done it because it's low priority and most Debianites are of the opinion that it's perfect as it is (I agree).

    The new features are hardware detection, auto-partitioning, and hooks for a gui. Some people have worked on one... not sure what links to give you because I don't personally care.

    I'm with the crowd that thinks graphical installers are ridiculous: they have higher hardware requirements, increase the chance of "killer" errors by several hundred percent, and they change nothing except appearances and the input device. Instead hitting the down arrow a few times and then Enter, you move a pointer down with your mouse and click Yes. All the same questions have to be asked, in the same order. The practical implications are so overwhelming compared to the aesthetic ones that it's just no contest, in my mind. For example, no graphical front-end to the installer will work on all 11 architectures that Debian could be installed on. Just expensive eye candy...

  5. Getting a .img onto a usb drive using Windows by Jakeg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Okay... so finally I was going to take the linux plunge with this. I don't want to use a CD okay, so don't go and suggest I do. I want to boot from a usb drive with a minimal install and download packages i want over the net.

    I want to gunzip the boot.img.gz directly onto my usb drive and then boot from that. As per the instructions at: http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apb.ht ml

    But how the hell do i get the boot.img.gz onto the usb drive? I could do it if I was already running linux apparently, but I'm not. Any ideas? I can gunzip it fine, but I need to write it directly to the usb drive. From what I can find, there's no program which can currently do that in windows. Th e catch 22 is that i would need linux first to do it. If anyone can please,please help tell me how to write the .img to a usb drive using windows then please please do! That's currently the only thing stopping me using linux.