Apple vs. Microsoft Myths Revisited
allgood2 writes "John Gruber at Daring Fireball has a great article exploring the myth that Apple could/would be Microsoft if only they had licensed their operating system. This myth has oft been purported in technology and business media."
It's generally agreed that the first version of Windows that didn't suck shipped in 1995, a decade after the arrival of the Mac.
Such a version of Windows was never released.
they could never compete with MS because they bother with all that quality controll non-sense
So it'll be a while.
'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
As a proud owner of a G5 I have to say there is nothing more fun than a ten-player game of Photoshop Deathmatch.
(But seriously, I do own a G5 and I do not regret it one bit.)
Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
Open Source Java DAO Generator
I have this really sweet gaussian blur death ray.
Quothe the article:Was you PC going "Blee-ble-ble-ble-ble-bleeee" so long that you missed the Switch commercials? That's kind of..........a bummer.
CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
I agree, even asinine. But you evidently did the usual Apple slam of only comparing against their top end desktop. OK, let's go to the Apple store and see what I can get. The cheapest desktop is $1049 CAD ($799 in America, btw). That is a lot less asinine, or even assinine.
What's that? You only count the high-end stuff worthy of your attention? OK, fine, but then do the same when comparing a Dell. If you compare low-end PC to high-end Apple, you'll end up looking assinine and asinine.
Why must the US stick to imperial units? The proper terminology is a metric fuckton. Standards, people, standards.
harmonious design
Because we all know that tires are both a significant fraction of the price of a new car, and frequently outlive the usefulness of the car....
Hey, did you have to go to bad analogy camp, or is it just raw talent?