Apple vs. Microsoft Myths Revisited
allgood2 writes "John Gruber at Daring Fireball has a great article exploring the myth that Apple could/would be Microsoft if only they had licensed their operating system. This myth has oft been purported in technology and business media."
I'm happy Apple never did dominate the market, whatever the reason. Having Microsoft in that role is bad enough, but a secretive, litigation-happy company like Apple with monopoly powers would have been a disaster.
Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
These days I suspect they would have died had they permitted the clones to continue, since they seem incapable of producing competitive, cost effective hardware, and would probably not have survived as simply an OS steward/manufacturer.
I have never used Macs for any meaningful length of time. They seem too expensive and have too small a software base compared to Windows and Linux combined. That is not an unfair comparison, given how common it is for people to have dual-bootable PCs.
Troll: Macs are for the same people who buy the pretentious new VW sedans and put single flowers in the vase on the steering wheel column.
(Advance apologies for not knowing how to linkify.)
There are other issues like peeling paint of TiBooks, hum from 1st generation G5s, windtunnel G4s, etc.
I would not trade my iBook for anything else except for a newer Apple laptop, but when it comes to QA, Apple is hardly infallible.