Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Starts Work On XForms

AnamanFan writes "The Mozilla Foundation, with Novell and IBM, announced the formation to implement the W3C's XForms 1.0 Recommendation on the Mozilla platform. XForms is the forms module in XHTML 2, developed by the W3C. The project enables developers to deliver the type of next-generation, rich, portable web-based applications desired by corporate IT. Is this one step away from the corporate world's dependence on ActiveX? We can only hope."

13 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. The truth is out there by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Funny
    The project enables developers to deliver the type of next-generation, rich, portable web-based applications desired by corporate IT.
    Also, it renames the Start menu to "I Want To Believe," and installs a hot wallpaper image of Gillian Anderson. Oh, wait, X-Forms..?
    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  2. In other news... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 4, Funny
    In other news, Microsoft announced today that Longhorn's internet browser will be powered by Mozilla.

    Please?! I for one don't mind if they keep their source closed. Just use the damn code, and we can all be standards compliant for once.

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  3. Anything thats not ActiveX.... by mboverload · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is better than ActiveX

  4. Re:What's really new in XForms? by spiff42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Yes, but you are missing the "on any device" part. At least all atempts so far to get my banking issues solved with my toaster have failed.

    /Spiff

  5. Re:Has MS Jumped on the Bandwagon? by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah we can all dream. Personally mine tend to involve fast cars, fast computers and fast red-heads with nice legs.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  6. Re:XHTML 2? Try Web Forms 2.0... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Funny
    Obviously the real challenge is forcing Microsoft to support it.
    No problem! Just install this ActiveX control and you have instant Web Forms 2.0 capabilities (oh yeah, and I get all your credit card numbers... whoops... did I say that?)
    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  7. Re:A little JavaScript, a little DOM by jonwil · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would any IT shop not want to use IE 6?
    Its been out long enough that its had various service packs and bugfixes so (unlike XPSP2 which is only just out), its probobly safe enough to use.

  8. Re:This is the end for me! by Yaa+101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    specialist always die out in nature...

  9. Re:Has MS Jumped on the Bandwagon? by dylan_- · · Score: 3, Funny
    Personally mine tend to involve fast cars, fast computers and fast red-heads with nice legs.
    That's not a dream; you're watching Knight Rider...
    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  10. Sounds good to me by The+Kenman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I support xforms.

    As a gen-x'r, I prefer to refer to everything as xanything. It really makes my life easier too, as a slacker (I slack therefore I am) you know that I need this. Instead of doing it the old way and calling it FancyNameForSomethingSimple, we just use xsfw. "Honey, where's the xbox?" "I dunno, I think it's in the xcarton in the xcar."

    The current forms implementation just sucks.....I'll take xanything new they're willing to try out. Nothing's ever going to replace [java/ecma]script, but if xfroms can cut down on the routine scripting like validation, or maybe just offer some fancy new features (the 'submit as XML' sounds pretty cool!), I'm still xdown.

    --
    ASCII silly question, get a silly ANSI.
  11. Re:Not only ActiveX by borgdows · · Score: 1, Funny

    [i]whoever builds new tech first gets the jump on the market, and as such gets to keep that market.[/i]

    let's tell that to Netscape, Real Networks, Mirabilis(ICQ), and others...

  12. Re:A little JavaScript, a little DOM by MexicanMenace · · Score: 2, Funny

    Took a lot of time to convince them to change as they felt the checkboxes looked better than the radio buttons.

    Good lord, don't get me started on designers and forms.

    "But putting round buttons on the page instead of square ones takes away from the feng shui of the layout man."

  13. Re:What's really new in XForms? by MexicanMenace · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but you are missing the "on any device" part. At least all atempts so far to get my banking issues solved with my toaster have failed.

    TOASTER: You know the last time you had toast? Eighteen days ago. 11:36, Tuesday the third. Two rounds.
    SPIFF: Ssshhh!
    TOASTER: I mean, what's the point of buying a toaster with artificial intelligence if you don't like toast?
    SPIFF: I do like toast.
    TOASTER: I mean, this is my job! This is cruel! Just cruel!
    SPIFF: Look, I'm busy!
    TOASTER: Oh, you're not busy eating toast, are you?
    SPIFF: No, I'm trying to reconcile my checkbook.
    TOASTER: I mean, the whole purpose of my existence is to serve you with hot, buttered, scrummy toast. If you don't want any, then my existence is meaningless.
    SPIFF: Good. Now show my my current checking account balance.
    TOASTER: I toast, therefore I am.
    SPIFF: CHECKING ! ACCOUNT ! BALANCE !