Slashdot Mirror


Forgent Squeezing Money Out Of JPEG, Other Patents

deman1985 writes "Forbes reports that Forgent Networks, Inc., developer of scheduling software and holder of a number of technology patents, has settled with both Adobe and Sony for JPEG patent infringement and is going after numerous others to collect their fair share of royalties. The company also plans to go after PVR companies, including TiVo Inc, and MP3 player makers for other various patents they claim to hold. Sounds like more fun in the courts for everyone!" We previously reported on Forgent's JPEG patent shenanigans back in April.

19 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. LZW check, JPEG, erm... by trisweb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just when we thought it was safe to put colored pixels on the internet again...

    --
    "!"
  2. A decision has been made... by laserbeak · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are putting a 1 cent per pixel toll on all JPEG images. All funds are directed towards global domination.

    1. Re:A decision has been made... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Vector-based JPEG format anyone? ;-)

    2. Re:A decision has been made... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      They are putting a 1 cent per pixel toll on all JPEG images.

      Ahh, so this is how you make a geek bankrupt from having too many girlfriends!

      Damn, it was a great side effect from avoiding real life girlfriends while it lasted.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. Re:The company name says it all... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should I not trust SourceForge then? That's kinda antithetical to typical /. ideology, as far as I'm concerned.

  4. Two potential solutions... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Start calling this "the porn patent" to see if they'll back off to avoid the bad PR.
    • Buy a bigger disk drive so you can convert your pron collection to PNG.
    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  5. Vergy good! by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 2, Funny

    That gives motivation to move on to JPEG-2000 and other superiour formats. Of course, those are patented as well already, so let's just get out a pencil and a piece of paper and forget the whole Internet thing...

    Of course, someone will point me to pencil and paper patents now... ;-)

  6. Re:PNG is fine... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well, I'm always fond of the .gif file format for large photos (you can animate those photos too, to get movies!).

    If you really want to get cool, make a html table with each cell one pixel of the image.. your image is now one big html file!

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  7. Re:Those Who Do Not Know History Are Doomed by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you have any idea how much pr0n I have in jpeg?

    Excluding the files that I have not checked or catagorized and stored in my repository, I have 103533 jpeg files (7704.57 MB) on my hard drive at the moment.

    That's a lot of converting.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  8. Re:Those Who Do Not Know History Are Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must have one very strong arm.

  9. That is not so simple by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually many of the GIFs were actually replaced with PNGs GIFs and PNGs support transparency (something JPEGs can't do) In any case many of had followed history and not only changed our GIFs, but also our JPEGs to PNG. PNG is a powerful open standard for image compression that is supported by our internet overlords.

    Changing every GIF to PNG on a site like Slashdot might have been easy even years ago when it was done, but some of us have quite a lot of important data stored in the JPEG format, which does not compress well with lossless PNG (e.g. anatomical photographs for scientific purposes). Just as an example:

    pth@ph9:28:/etc/X11$ du -sh ~/work/projects/.linuxx/.a/xxx/jpegs
    127G /home/pth/work/projects/.linuxx/.a/xxx/jpegs
    pth@ph9:28:/etc/X11$

    It is not a simple matter of:

    $ find ~ -iname '*.jpg' -exec convert {} {}.png ';'

    Well, actually it is, but it would take O(n) time (at least).

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  10. Patent? by Luigi30 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought SCO patented extortion.

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
  11. Re:Run length coding? Patentable? Come on! by shish · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think Cave Man Og had prior art when he stopped saying "I have rock, rock, rock", and instead said "I have 3 rocks".

    But wait; this uses a computer, so it's an entirely new concept... never mind.

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  12. David Versus Goliath? by argent · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I believe this is just more proof that this David and Goliath story is just getting started," said Mannsbach, who said he holds close to 5 percent of Forgent's shares on behalf of clients.

    This would be some kind of "American McGee's David Vs Goliath", with a David hooked on heroin and using his sling to tie off when he shoots up... it's definitely some looking-glass version of the story, 'cos I remember the original David being the hero, not an opportunistic parasite.

  13. Re:Those Who Do Not Know History Are Doomed by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny
    Less than 8GB of pr0n?

    You're just not taking it seriously.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. Re:Weak position from Jpeg.org by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bloody hell, I thought you were kidding until I did a search on the patent office website:

    United States Patent 6,004,596

    1. A sealed crustless sandwich, comprising:

    a first bread layer having a first perimeter surface coplanar to a contact surface;

    at least one filling of an edible food juxtaposed to said contact surface;

    a second bread layer juxtaposed to said at least one filling opposite of said first bread layer, wherein said second bread layer includes a second perimeter surface similar to said first perimeter surface;

    a crimped edge directly between said first perimeter surface and said second perimeter surface for sealing said at least one filling between said first bread layer and said second bread layer;

    wherein a crust portion of said first bread layer and said second bread layer has been removed.

  15. Re:Honestly. by templest · · Score: 2, Funny
    I mean, I start my day on /. and the first news is someone getting sued over JPEG. What a way to ruin my day.
    You mean you're waking up right now? This is the last thing I'm reading before going to sleep!

    For the record, it's 7:14AM right now
    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  16. Just another reason that proprietary beats FOSS! by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Funny

    If these companies had been using proprietary software, nobody would have known what technologies they were using, so they wouldn't have been sued, would they?

    <G/D/R>

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  17. Re:Honestly. by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Funny
    Bahahaha!!!

    I love it. The irony is priceless. You do know you are linking to your photography site FULL of jpegs!! Better get out the checkbook!

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?